Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1373068 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in of_dev_lookup

Started byRob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
First post2016-04-07 07:00 +0200
Last post2016-04-12 18:40 +0200
Articles 7 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in of_dev_lookup Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> - 2016-04-07 07:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in  of_dev_lookup Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> - 2016-04-07 12:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in of_dev_lookup Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> - 2016-04-07 13:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in  of_dev_lookup Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-04-12 17:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in  of_dev_lookup Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-04-07 19:00 +0200
      Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in of_dev_lookup Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> - 2016-04-12 18:00 +0200
        Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in  of_dev_lookup Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> - 2016-04-12 18:40 +0200

#1373068 — Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in of_dev_lookup

FromRob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Date2016-04-07 07:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in of_dev_lookup
Message-ID<rlacW-6ZO-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [160401 14:37]:
>> We currently try to match of_dev_auxdata based on compatible,
>> IO address, and device name. But in some cases we have multiple
>> instances of drivers that can use the same auxdata.
>>
>> Let's add an additional secondary lookup for generic compatible
>> match for auxdata if no device specific match is found. This does
>> not change the existing matching, and still allows adding device
>> specific auxdata.
>>
>> This simplifies things as specifying the IO address and device
>> name is prone errors as it requires maintaining an in kernel
>> database for each SoC.
>
> And here's what I can apply later on to get rid of some
> ifdeffery.
>
> I'm also planning to move some of the legacy omap hwmod
> functionality into proper device drivers, so can generic
> pdata for that too.

Why can't the platform data be moved into the driver given that it
appears to be only SoC family specific? Auxdata was somewhat intended
to be temporary. It appears there is already some per compatible match
data for these OMAP parts in the driver.

Rob

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1373251 — Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in of_dev_lookup

FromGrygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com>
Date2016-04-07 12:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in of_dev_lookup
Message-ID<rlfmi-2le-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1373068
On 04/07/2016 07:52 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [160401 14:37]:
>>> We currently try to match of_dev_auxdata based on compatible,
>>> IO address, and device name. But in some cases we have multiple
>>> instances of drivers that can use the same auxdata.
>>>
>>> Let's add an additional secondary lookup for generic compatible
>>> match for auxdata if no device specific match is found. This does
>>> not change the existing matching, and still allows adding device
>>> specific auxdata.
>>>
>>> This simplifies things as specifying the IO address and device
>>> name is prone errors as it requires maintaining an in kernel
>>> database for each SoC.
>>
>> And here's what I can apply later on to get rid of some
>> ifdeffery.
>>
>> I'm also planning to move some of the legacy omap hwmod
>> functionality into proper device drivers, so can generic
>> pdata for that too.
> 
> Why can't the platform data be moved into the driver given that it
> appears to be only SoC family specific? Auxdata was somewhat intended
> to be temporary. It appears there is already some per compatible match
> data for these OMAP parts in the driver.
> 

Most probably this is required to pass some data from parent device to
children when parent dev instantiate children from DT, at least I've experimented with
this in mostly similar way (I've not added second pass and did break in the first
if !phys_addr, but Tony's patch is more correct).

For example,
- USB dwc3 platform/integration layer dev creates DWC3-core device (of_platform_populate())
- DWC3-core device creates xhci device
- USB dwc3 platform/integration layer dev can dynamically get rev info
  from HW and identify limitation/erratas/quirks which need to be applied to 
  to its children.
- DWC3-core can dynamically get rev info ...

I was not able to find any other proper way to pass this (platfrom)data to children, except
using Auxdata. And, as per Felipe Balbi, It was the major reason why now
DWC3-core device creates xhci device manually.

-- 
regards,
-grygorii

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1373278

FromFelipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
Date2016-04-07 13:20 +0200
Message-ID<rlg8F-2Yy-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1373251

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi,

Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> writes:
> On 04/07/2016 07:52 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>>> * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [160401 14:37]:
>>>> We currently try to match of_dev_auxdata based on compatible,
>>>> IO address, and device name. But in some cases we have multiple
>>>> instances of drivers that can use the same auxdata.
>>>>
>>>> Let's add an additional secondary lookup for generic compatible
>>>> match for auxdata if no device specific match is found. This does
>>>> not change the existing matching, and still allows adding device
>>>> specific auxdata.
>>>>
>>>> This simplifies things as specifying the IO address and device
>>>> name is prone errors as it requires maintaining an in kernel
>>>> database for each SoC.
>>>
>>> And here's what I can apply later on to get rid of some
>>> ifdeffery.
>>>
>>> I'm also planning to move some of the legacy omap hwmod
>>> functionality into proper device drivers, so can generic
>>> pdata for that too.
>> 
>> Why can't the platform data be moved into the driver given that it
>> appears to be only SoC family specific? Auxdata was somewhat intended
>> to be temporary. It appears there is already some per compatible match
>> data for these OMAP parts in the driver.
>> 
>
> Most probably this is required to pass some data from parent device to
> children when parent dev instantiate children from DT, at least I've experimented with
> this in mostly similar way (I've not added second pass and did break in the first
> if !phys_addr, but Tony's patch is more correct).
>
> For example,
> - USB dwc3 platform/integration layer dev creates DWC3-core device (of_platform_populate())
> - DWC3-core device creates xhci device
> - USB dwc3 platform/integration layer dev can dynamically get rev info
>   from HW and identify limitation/erratas/quirks which need to be applied to 
>   to its children.
> - DWC3-core can dynamically get rev info ...
>
> I was not able to find any other proper way to pass this (platfrom)data to children, except
> using Auxdata. And, as per Felipe Balbi, It was the major reason why now
> DWC3-core device creates xhci device manually.

doesn't device_property() solve that ? I'm just waiting for some patches
from Heikki (in Cc) before we rip pdata from dwc3 completely. At that
point, we can look at building xhci from DT.

The only thing that comes to mind is how this will look for PCI-only
systems if we rip manual xHCI device creation completely.

-- 
balbi

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1376893 — Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in of_dev_lookup

FromTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Date2016-04-12 17:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in of_dev_lookup
Message-ID<rn8gF-10N-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1373278
* Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> [160407 04:19]:
> Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@ti.com> writes:
> > Most probably this is required to pass some data from parent device to
> > children when parent dev instantiate children from DT, at least I've experimented with
> > this in mostly similar way (I've not added second pass and did break in the first
> > if !phys_addr, but Tony's patch is more correct).

OK that's a different use case I have, but good to know it helps
with that too.

> > For example,
> > - USB dwc3 platform/integration layer dev creates DWC3-core device (of_platform_populate())
> > - DWC3-core device creates xhci device
> > - USB dwc3 platform/integration layer dev can dynamically get rev info
> >   from HW and identify limitation/erratas/quirks which need to be applied to 
> >   to its children.
> > - DWC3-core can dynamically get rev info ...
> >
> > I was not able to find any other proper way to pass this (platfrom)data to children, except
> > using Auxdata. And, as per Felipe Balbi, It was the major reason why now
> > DWC3-core device creates xhci device manually.
> 
> doesn't device_property() solve that ? I'm just waiting for some patches
> from Heikki (in Cc) before we rip pdata from dwc3 completely. At that
> point, we can look at building xhci from DT.
> 
> The only thing that comes to mind is how this will look for PCI-only
> systems if we rip manual xHCI device creation completely.

Sounds like this dwc3 thread is a bit separate from the $subject patch
except for the legacy usage.

Regards,

Tony

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1373573 — Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in of_dev_lookup

FromTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Date2016-04-07 19:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in of_dev_lookup
Message-ID<rllrJ-6RI-45@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1373068
* Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> [160406 21:53]:
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [160401 14:37]:
> >> We currently try to match of_dev_auxdata based on compatible,
> >> IO address, and device name. But in some cases we have multiple
> >> instances of drivers that can use the same auxdata.
> >>
> >> Let's add an additional secondary lookup for generic compatible
> >> match for auxdata if no device specific match is found. This does
> >> not change the existing matching, and still allows adding device
> >> specific auxdata.
> >>
> >> This simplifies things as specifying the IO address and device
> >> name is prone errors as it requires maintaining an in kernel
> >> database for each SoC.
> >
> > And here's what I can apply later on to get rid of some
> > ifdeffery.
> >
> > I'm also planning to move some of the legacy omap hwmod
> > functionality into proper device drivers, so can generic
> > pdata for that too.
> 
> Why can't the platform data be moved into the driver given that it
> appears to be only SoC family specific? Auxdata was somewhat intended
> to be temporary. It appears there is already some per compatible match
> data for these OMAP parts in the driver.

There are just too many dependencies to move legacy code into drivers
directly. Especially when moving the omap hwmod code into drivers,
we still to use hwmod callbacks at least for clockdomain configuration,
wake-up dependencies and clock autogating configuration.

When we have Linux generic frameworks available for all this we no longer
need the auxdata. But meanwhile, removing the depenencies by using
auxdata already allows moving big chunks of the hwmod code into regular
device drivers.

Regards,

Tony

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1376980

FromRob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
Date2016-04-12 18:00 +0200
Message-ID<rn8Tp-1ma-43@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1373573
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> * Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> [160406 21:53]:
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
>> > * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [160401 14:37]:
>> >> We currently try to match of_dev_auxdata based on compatible,
>> >> IO address, and device name. But in some cases we have multiple
>> >> instances of drivers that can use the same auxdata.
>> >>
>> >> Let's add an additional secondary lookup for generic compatible
>> >> match for auxdata if no device specific match is found. This does
>> >> not change the existing matching, and still allows adding device
>> >> specific auxdata.
>> >>
>> >> This simplifies things as specifying the IO address and device
>> >> name is prone errors as it requires maintaining an in kernel
>> >> database for each SoC.
>> >
>> > And here's what I can apply later on to get rid of some
>> > ifdeffery.
>> >
>> > I'm also planning to move some of the legacy omap hwmod
>> > functionality into proper device drivers, so can generic
>> > pdata for that too.
>>
>> Why can't the platform data be moved into the driver given that it
>> appears to be only SoC family specific? Auxdata was somewhat intended
>> to be temporary. It appears there is already some per compatible match
>> data for these OMAP parts in the driver.
>
> There are just too many dependencies to move legacy code into drivers
> directly. Especially when moving the omap hwmod code into drivers,
> we still to use hwmod callbacks at least for clockdomain configuration,
> wake-up dependencies and clock autogating configuration.
>
> When we have Linux generic frameworks available for all this we no longer
> need the auxdata. But meanwhile, removing the depenencies by using
> auxdata already allows moving big chunks of the hwmod code into regular
> device drivers.

Okay. In that case:

Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>

Apply it when you have actual users depending on it.

Rob

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1377004 — Re: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in of_dev_lookup

FromTony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>
Date2016-04-12 18:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] of/platform: Allow secondary compatible match in of_dev_lookup
Message-ID<rn9w6-1Xf-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1376980
* Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> [160412 08:57]:
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 11:58 AM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> > * Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org> [160406 21:53]:
> >> On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 4:40 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> wrote:
> >> > * Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> [160401 14:37]:
> >> >> We currently try to match of_dev_auxdata based on compatible,
> >> >> IO address, and device name. But in some cases we have multiple
> >> >> instances of drivers that can use the same auxdata.
> >> >>
> >> >> Let's add an additional secondary lookup for generic compatible
> >> >> match for auxdata if no device specific match is found. This does
> >> >> not change the existing matching, and still allows adding device
> >> >> specific auxdata.
> >> >>
> >> >> This simplifies things as specifying the IO address and device
> >> >> name is prone errors as it requires maintaining an in kernel
> >> >> database for each SoC.
> >> >
> >> > And here's what I can apply later on to get rid of some
> >> > ifdeffery.
> >> >
> >> > I'm also planning to move some of the legacy omap hwmod
> >> > functionality into proper device drivers, so can generic
> >> > pdata for that too.
> >>
> >> Why can't the platform data be moved into the driver given that it
> >> appears to be only SoC family specific? Auxdata was somewhat intended
> >> to be temporary. It appears there is already some per compatible match
> >> data for these OMAP parts in the driver.
> >
> > There are just too many dependencies to move legacy code into drivers
> > directly. Especially when moving the omap hwmod code into drivers,
> > we still to use hwmod callbacks at least for clockdomain configuration,
> > wake-up dependencies and clock autogating configuration.
> >
> > When we have Linux generic frameworks available for all this we no longer
> > need the auxdata. But meanwhile, removing the depenencies by using
> > auxdata already allows moving big chunks of the hwmod code into regular
> > device drivers.
> 
> Okay. In that case:
> 
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> 
> Apply it when you have actual users depending on it.

OK thanks will do.

Regards,

Tony

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web