Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1374617 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-09 14:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-09 14:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 12/15] irqchip/gic: Pass GIC pointer to save/restore functions Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> - 2016-04-09 14:00 +0200
| From | Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-09 14:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 12/15] irqchip/gic: Pass GIC pointer to save/restore functions |
| Message-ID | <rlZIu-4lP-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, 17 Mar 2016 14:19:16 +0000 Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> wrote: > Instead of passing the GIC index to the save/restore functions pass a > pointer to the GIC chip data. This will allow these save/restore > functions to be re-used by a platform driver where the GIC chip data > structure is allocated dynamically and so there is no applicable index > for identifying the GIC. > > Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Eventually, I'd like to move to a situation where we don't statically allocate the chip data anymore, and kill CONFIG_ARM_GIC_MAX_NR altogether. This is obviously a step in the right direction. Acked-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com> M. -- Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny.
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web