Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1373570 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 08/14] coresight: tmc: allocating memory when needed

Started bySuzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
First post2016-04-07 19:00 +0200
Last post2016-04-08 17:30 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 08/14] coresight: tmc: allocating memory when needed Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> - 2016-04-07 19:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 08/14] coresight: tmc: allocating memory when needed Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> - 2016-04-08 17:30 +0200

#1373570 — Re: [PATCH 08/14] coresight: tmc: allocating memory when needed

FromSuzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>
Date2016-04-07 19:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 08/14] coresight: tmc: allocating memory when needed
Message-ID<rllrJ-6RI-37@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 22/03/16 20:23, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> In it's current form the TMC probe() function allocates
> trace buffer memory at boot time, event if coresight isn't
> used.  This is highly inefficient since trace buffers can
> occupy a lot of memory that could be used otherwised.
>
> This patch allocates trace buffers on the fly, when the
> coresight subsytem is sollicited.  Allocated buffers are

nit: *subsystem* is *solicited*.

> released when traces are read using the device descriptors
> under /dev.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++-----
>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c | 97 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.c     | 14 ----
>   3 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
> index f9749924a055..e5d67e01409c 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c


> @@ -205,52 +231,75 @@ const struct coresight_ops tmc_etf_cs_ops = {
>
>   int tmc_read_prepare_etf(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>   {
> -	int ret = 0;
>   	enum tmc_mode mode;
>   	unsigned long flags;
>
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>
> -	/* The TMC isn't enable, so there is no need to disable it */
> -	if (!drvdata->enable)
> +	/* The TMC isn't enabled, so there is no need to disable it */
> +	if (!drvdata->enable) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The ETB/ETF is disabled already.  If drvdata::buf is NULL
> +		 * trace data has been harvested.
> +		 */
> +		if (!drvdata->buf) {
> +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
>   		goto out;
> +	}
>
>   	if (drvdata->config_type != TMC_CONFIG_TYPE_ETB &&
>   	    drvdata->config_type != TMC_CONFIG_TYPE_ETF) {
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto out;
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
> +		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>
>   	/* There is no point in reading a TMC in HW FIFO mode */
>   	mode = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TMC_MODE);
>   	if (mode != TMC_MODE_CIRCULAR_BUFFER) {
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto out;
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
> +		return -EINVAL;
>   	}

>
>   	tmc_etb_disable_hw(drvdata);
> -	drvdata->reading = true;
> +	tmc_etb_dump_hw(drvdata);

The addition of tmc_etb_dump_hw() should have been part of the previous patch,
which made disable() reusable.

>
>   out:
> +	drvdata->reading = true;

Instead of spilling the spin_unlock_irq_restore() and return from too many
different places in the function above, could we do :

done:
	drvdata->reading = true;

out:
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
> -	return ret;
> +	return 0;


>   }
>
>   int tmc_read_unprepare_etf(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>   {

...

> +	}
> +
> +	/* The TMC isn't enabled, so there is no need to enable it */
> +	if (!drvdata->enable) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The ETB/ETF is not tracing and the buffer was just read.
> +		 * As such prepare to free the trace buffer.
> +		 */
> +		buf = drvdata->buf;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * drvdata::buf is switched on in tmc_read_prepare_etf() so
> +		 * it is important to set it back to NULL.
> +		 */
> +		drvdata->buf = NULL;
>   		goto out;
>   	}

This check should be brought down after the MODE check below for better error
check.

>
> @@ -258,13 +307,25 @@ int tmc_read_unprepare_etf(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>   	mode = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TMC_MODE);
>   	if (mode != TMC_MODE_CIRCULAR_BUFFER) {
>   		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto out;
> +		goto err;
>   	}
>
> +	/*
> +	 * The trace run will continue with the same allocated trace buffer.
> +	 * As such zero-out the buffer so that we don't end up with stale
> +	 * data.
> +	 */

Could this drvdata->buf be NULL here ?

> +	memset(drvdata->buf, 0, drvdata->size);
>   	tmc_etb_enable_hw(drvdata);
> -	drvdata->reading = false;
>
>   out:
> +	drvdata->reading = false;
> +
> +err:
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
> +
> +	/* Free allocated memory outside of the spinlock */
> +	kfree(buf);
> +
>   	return ret;
>   }
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
> index 67e7d5dd891f..c4962568276e 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
>    */
>
>   #include <linux/coresight.h>
> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> +
>   #include "coresight-priv.h"
>   #include "coresight-tmc.h"
>
> @@ -82,19 +84,51 @@ static void tmc_etr_disable_hw(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>
>   static int tmc_enable_etr_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode)
>   {
> +	bool allocated = false;
>   	unsigned long flags;
> +	void __iomem *vaddr;
> +	dma_addr_t paddr;
>   	struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
>
> +	/*
> +	 * Contiguous  memory can't be allocated while a spinlock is held.
> +	 * As such allocate memory here and free it if a buffer has already
> +	 * been allocated (from a previous session).
> +	 */
> +	vaddr = dma_alloc_coherent(drvdata->dev, drvdata->size,
> +				   &paddr, GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!vaddr)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>   	if (drvdata->reading) {
>   		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
> +		dma_free_coherent(drvdata->dev, drvdata->size, vaddr, paddr);
>   		return -EBUSY;
>   	}

Both here and above in the etf/etb case, could we do a preliminary check
by taking the lock where we may not have to allocate the buffer and allocate
it if necessary and retake the lock ? I know it could make the code a bit more
complex, but could save us on unnecessary allocations.

Also it would be good to consolidate the return points here as well for the
error path.

>
> +	/*
> +	 * If drvdata::buf == NULL, use the memory allocated above.
> +	 * Otherwise a buffer still exists from a previous session, so
> +	 * simply use that.
> +	 */
> +	if (!drvdata->buf) {
> +		allocated = true;
> +		drvdata->vaddr = vaddr;
> +		drvdata->paddr = paddr;
> +		drvdata->buf = drvdata->vaddr;
> +	}
> +
> +	memset(drvdata->vaddr, 0, drvdata->size);
> +
>   	tmc_etr_enable_hw(drvdata);
>   	drvdata->enable = true;
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>
> +	/* Free memory outside the spinlock if need be */
> +	if (!allocated)
> +		dma_free_coherent(drvdata->dev, drvdata->size, vaddr, paddr);
> +
>   	dev_info(drvdata->dev, "TMC-ETR enabled\n");
>   	return 0;
>   }
> @@ -129,48 +163,87 @@ const struct coresight_ops tmc_etr_cs_ops = {
>
>   int tmc_read_prepare_etr(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>   {
> -	int ret = 0;
>   	unsigned long flags;
>
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>
> -	/* The TMC isn't enable, so there is no need to disable it */
> -	if (!drvdata->enable)
> +	/* The TMC isn't enabled, so there is no need to disable it */
> +	if (!drvdata->enable) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The ETR is disabled already.  If drvdata::buf is NULL
> +		 * trace data has been harvested.
> +		 */
> +		if (!drvdata->buf) {
> +			spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
> +			return -EINVAL;
> +		}
> +
>   		goto out;
> +	}
>
>   	if (drvdata->config_type != TMC_CONFIG_TYPE_ETR) {
> -		ret = -EINVAL;
> -		goto out;
> +		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
> +		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
>
>   	tmc_etr_disable_hw(drvdata);
> -	drvdata->reading = true;
> +	tmc_etr_dump_hw(drvdata);

Same as for etf/etb, shouldn't the above dump_hw be part of the previous patch ?

>
>   out:
> +	drvdata->reading = true;
>   	spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
> -	return ret;
> +	return 0;
>   }
>
>   int tmc_read_unprepare_etr(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>   {
>   	int ret = 0;
>   	unsigned long flags;
> +	void __iomem *vaddr = NULL;
> +	dma_addr_t paddr;
>
>   	spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>
> -	/* The TMC isn't enable, so there is no need to enable it */
> -	if (!drvdata->enable)
> -		goto out;
> -
>   	if (drvdata->config_type != TMC_CONFIG_TYPE_ETR) {
>   		ret = -EINVAL;
> +		goto err;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* The TMC isn't enabled, so there is no need to enable it */
> +	if (!drvdata->enable) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The ETR is not tracing and trace data was just read. As
> +		 * such prepare to free the trace buffer.
> +		 */
> +		vaddr = drvdata->vaddr;
> +		paddr = drvdata->paddr;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * drvdata::buf is switched on in tmc_read_prepare_etr() and
> +		 * tmc_enable_etr_sink so it is important to set it back to
> +		 * NULL.
> +		 */
> +		drvdata->buf = NULL;
>   		goto out;
>   	}
>
> +	/*
> +	 * The trace run will continue with the same allocated trace buffer.
> +	 * As such zero-out the buffer so that we don't end up with stale
> +	 * data.
> +	 */
> +	memset(drvdata->buf, 0, drvdata->size);

Are we sure drvdata->buf is not NULL here ?


Suzuki

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1374305

FromMathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
Date2016-04-08 17:30 +0200
Message-ID<rlGwa-5UD-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1373570
On 7 April 2016 at 10:50, Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com> wrote:
> On 22/03/16 20:23, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>>
>> In it's current form the TMC probe() function allocates
>> trace buffer memory at boot time, event if coresight isn't
>> used.  This is highly inefficient since trace buffers can
>> occupy a lot of memory that could be used otherwised.
>>
>> This patch allocates trace buffers on the fly, when the
>> coresight subsytem is sollicited.  Allocated buffers are
>
>
> nit: *subsystem* is *solicited*.

Ack

>
>> released when traces are read using the device descriptors
>> under /dev.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c | 97
>> ++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c | 97
>> ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>>   drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.c     | 14 ----
>>   3 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>> index f9749924a055..e5d67e01409c 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etf.c
>
>
>
>> @@ -205,52 +231,75 @@ const struct coresight_ops tmc_etf_cs_ops = {
>>
>>   int tmc_read_prepare_etf(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>>   {
>> -       int ret = 0;
>>         enum tmc_mode mode;
>>         unsigned long flags;
>>
>>         spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>>
>> -       /* The TMC isn't enable, so there is no need to disable it */
>> -       if (!drvdata->enable)
>> +       /* The TMC isn't enabled, so there is no need to disable it */
>> +       if (!drvdata->enable) {
>> +               /*
>> +                * The ETB/ETF is disabled already.  If drvdata::buf is
>> NULL
>> +                * trace data has been harvested.
>> +                */
>> +               if (!drvdata->buf) {
>> +                       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> +                       return -EINVAL;
>> +               }
>> +
>>                 goto out;
>> +       }
>>
>>         if (drvdata->config_type != TMC_CONFIG_TYPE_ETB &&
>>             drvdata->config_type != TMC_CONFIG_TYPE_ETF) {
>> -               ret = -EINVAL;
>> -               goto out;
>> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>>         }
>>
>>         /* There is no point in reading a TMC in HW FIFO mode */
>>         mode = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TMC_MODE);
>>         if (mode != TMC_MODE_CIRCULAR_BUFFER) {
>> -               ret = -EINVAL;
>> -               goto out;
>> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>>         }
>
>
>>
>>         tmc_etb_disable_hw(drvdata);
>> -       drvdata->reading = true;
>> +       tmc_etb_dump_hw(drvdata);
>
>
> The addition of tmc_etb_dump_hw() should have been part of the previous
> patch,
> which made disable() reusable.

Thanks for your comment on this patchset.

After Dan found an error with the memory allocation I started to look
at the driver again and found several areas worth improving.  I'm
currently re-writing this patchset and the result should be much
easier to follow.  I would appreciate if you can have a look when V2
is out.

Best regards,
Mathieu

[1]. http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg494888.html

>
>>
>>   out:
>> +       drvdata->reading = true;
>
>
> Instead of spilling the spin_unlock_irq_restore() and return from too many
> different places in the function above, could we do :
>
> done:
>         drvdata->reading = true;
>
> out:
>>
>>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> -       return ret;
>> +       return 0;
>
>
>
>>   }
>>
>>   int tmc_read_unprepare_etf(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>>   {
>
>
> ...
>
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       /* The TMC isn't enabled, so there is no need to enable it */
>> +       if (!drvdata->enable) {
>> +               /*
>> +                * The ETB/ETF is not tracing and the buffer was just
>> read.
>> +                * As such prepare to free the trace buffer.
>> +                */
>> +               buf = drvdata->buf;
>> +
>> +               /*
>> +                * drvdata::buf is switched on in tmc_read_prepare_etf()
>> so
>> +                * it is important to set it back to NULL.
>> +                */
>> +               drvdata->buf = NULL;
>>                 goto out;
>>         }
>
>
> This check should be brought down after the MODE check below for better
> error
> check.
>
>>
>> @@ -258,13 +307,25 @@ int tmc_read_unprepare_etf(struct tmc_drvdata
>> *drvdata)
>>         mode = readl_relaxed(drvdata->base + TMC_MODE);
>>         if (mode != TMC_MODE_CIRCULAR_BUFFER) {
>>                 ret = -EINVAL;
>> -               goto out;
>> +               goto err;
>>         }
>>
>> +       /*
>> +        * The trace run will continue with the same allocated trace
>> buffer.
>> +        * As such zero-out the buffer so that we don't end up with stale
>> +        * data.
>> +        */
>
>
> Could this drvdata->buf be NULL here ?
>
>> +       memset(drvdata->buf, 0, drvdata->size);
>>         tmc_etb_enable_hw(drvdata);
>> -       drvdata->reading = false;
>>
>>   out:
>> +       drvdata->reading = false;
>> +
>> +err:
>>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> +
>> +       /* Free allocated memory outside of the spinlock */
>> +       kfree(buf);
>> +
>>         return ret;
>>   }
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> index 67e7d5dd891f..c4962568276e 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,8 @@
>>    */
>>
>>   #include <linux/coresight.h>
>> +#include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
>> +
>>   #include "coresight-priv.h"
>>   #include "coresight-tmc.h"
>>
>> @@ -82,19 +84,51 @@ static void tmc_etr_disable_hw(struct tmc_drvdata
>> *drvdata)
>>
>>   static int tmc_enable_etr_sink(struct coresight_device *csdev, u32 mode)
>>   {
>> +       bool allocated = false;
>>         unsigned long flags;
>> +       void __iomem *vaddr;
>> +       dma_addr_t paddr;
>>         struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(csdev->dev.parent);
>>
>> +       /*
>> +        * Contiguous  memory can't be allocated while a spinlock is held.
>> +        * As such allocate memory here and free it if a buffer has
>> already
>> +        * been allocated (from a previous session).
>> +        */
>> +       vaddr = dma_alloc_coherent(drvdata->dev, drvdata->size,
>> +                                  &paddr, GFP_KERNEL);
>> +       if (!vaddr)
>> +               return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>>         spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>>         if (drvdata->reading) {
>>                 spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> +               dma_free_coherent(drvdata->dev, drvdata->size, vaddr,
>> paddr);
>>                 return -EBUSY;
>>         }
>
>
> Both here and above in the etf/etb case, could we do a preliminary check
> by taking the lock where we may not have to allocate the buffer and allocate
> it if necessary and retake the lock ? I know it could make the code a bit
> more
> complex, but could save us on unnecessary allocations.
>
> Also it would be good to consolidate the return points here as well for the
> error path.
>
>>
>> +       /*
>> +        * If drvdata::buf == NULL, use the memory allocated above.
>> +        * Otherwise a buffer still exists from a previous session, so
>> +        * simply use that.
>> +        */
>> +       if (!drvdata->buf) {
>> +               allocated = true;
>> +               drvdata->vaddr = vaddr;
>> +               drvdata->paddr = paddr;
>> +               drvdata->buf = drvdata->vaddr;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       memset(drvdata->vaddr, 0, drvdata->size);
>> +
>>         tmc_etr_enable_hw(drvdata);
>>         drvdata->enable = true;
>>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>>
>> +       /* Free memory outside the spinlock if need be */
>> +       if (!allocated)
>> +               dma_free_coherent(drvdata->dev, drvdata->size, vaddr,
>> paddr);
>> +
>>         dev_info(drvdata->dev, "TMC-ETR enabled\n");
>>         return 0;
>>   }
>> @@ -129,48 +163,87 @@ const struct coresight_ops tmc_etr_cs_ops = {
>>
>>   int tmc_read_prepare_etr(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>>   {
>> -       int ret = 0;
>>         unsigned long flags;
>>
>>         spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>>
>> -       /* The TMC isn't enable, so there is no need to disable it */
>> -       if (!drvdata->enable)
>> +       /* The TMC isn't enabled, so there is no need to disable it */
>> +       if (!drvdata->enable) {
>> +               /*
>> +                * The ETR is disabled already.  If drvdata::buf is NULL
>> +                * trace data has been harvested.
>> +                */
>> +               if (!drvdata->buf) {
>> +                       spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> +                       return -EINVAL;
>> +               }
>> +
>>                 goto out;
>> +       }
>>
>>         if (drvdata->config_type != TMC_CONFIG_TYPE_ETR) {
>> -               ret = -EINVAL;
>> -               goto out;
>> +               spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> +               return -EINVAL;
>>         }
>>
>>         tmc_etr_disable_hw(drvdata);
>> -       drvdata->reading = true;
>> +       tmc_etr_dump_hw(drvdata);
>
>
> Same as for etf/etb, shouldn't the above dump_hw be part of the previous
> patch ?
>
>>
>>   out:
>> +       drvdata->reading = true;
>>         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>> -       return ret;
>> +       return 0;
>>   }
>>
>>   int tmc_read_unprepare_etr(struct tmc_drvdata *drvdata)
>>   {
>>         int ret = 0;
>>         unsigned long flags;
>> +       void __iomem *vaddr = NULL;
>> +       dma_addr_t paddr;
>>
>>         spin_lock_irqsave(&drvdata->spinlock, flags);
>>
>> -       /* The TMC isn't enable, so there is no need to enable it */
>> -       if (!drvdata->enable)
>> -               goto out;
>> -
>>         if (drvdata->config_type != TMC_CONFIG_TYPE_ETR) {
>>                 ret = -EINVAL;
>> +               goto err;
>> +       }
>> +
>> +       /* The TMC isn't enabled, so there is no need to enable it */
>> +       if (!drvdata->enable) {
>> +               /*
>> +                * The ETR is not tracing and trace data was just read. As
>> +                * such prepare to free the trace buffer.
>> +                */
>> +               vaddr = drvdata->vaddr;
>> +               paddr = drvdata->paddr;
>> +
>> +               /*
>> +                * drvdata::buf is switched on in tmc_read_prepare_etr()
>> and
>> +                * tmc_enable_etr_sink so it is important to set it back
>> to
>> +                * NULL.
>> +                */
>> +               drvdata->buf = NULL;
>>                 goto out;
>>         }
>>
>> +       /*
>> +        * The trace run will continue with the same allocated trace
>> buffer.
>> +        * As such zero-out the buffer so that we don't end up with stale
>> +        * data.
>> +        */
>> +       memset(drvdata->buf, 0, drvdata->size);
>
>
> Are we sure drvdata->buf is not NULL here ?
>
>
> Suzuki

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web