Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1372801 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] phy: rockchip-dp: should be a child device of the GRF

Started byHeiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
First post2016-04-06 22:40 +0200
Last post2016-04-06 22:40 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] phy: rockchip-dp: should be a child device of the GRF Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> - 2016-04-06 22:40 +0200

#1372801 — Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] phy: rockchip-dp: should be a child device of the GRF

FromHeiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Date2016-04-06 22:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 1/3] phy: rockchip-dp: should be a child device of the GRF
Message-ID<rl2p4-13c-11@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Kishon,

Am Donnerstag, 24. März 2016, 22:29:01 schrieb Heiko Stuebner:
> The displayport-phy is fully enclosed in the general register files (GRF).
> Therefore as seen from the device-tree it shouldn't be a separate
> platform- device but instead a sub-device of the GRF - using the
> simply-mfd mechanism.
> 
> The driver entered the kernel in the current merge-window, so we can still
> adapt the binding without needing a fallback, as the binding hasn't been
> released with a full kernel yet.
> 
> While the edp phy is fully part of the GRF, it doesn't have any separate
> register set there, so doesn't get any register-area assigned.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>

could you please look at taking these patches into the 4.6-rc kernel as fixes 
please. I'd really like to not having to keep the old interface around and 
currently we still can just convert without keeping backward compatibility.


Thanks
Heiko

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web