Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1371285 > unrolled thread
| Started by | oulijun <oulijun@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-05 09:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-05 17:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [RESEND PATCH V4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support oulijun <oulijun@huawei.com> - 2016-04-05 09:40 +0200
Re: [RESEND PATCH V4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support Leon Romanovsky <leon@leon.nu> - 2016-04-05 17:40 +0200
| From | oulijun <oulijun@huawei.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 09:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [RESEND PATCH V4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support |
| Message-ID | <rktKF-89N-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi, Leon Romanovsky
On 2016/4/2 9:58, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:21:31PM +0800, Lijun Ou wrote:
>> The driver for HiSilicon RoCE is a platform driver.
>> The driver will support multiple versions of hardware. Currently only "v1"
>> for hip06 SoC is supported.
>> The driver includes two parts: common driver and hardware-specific
>> operations. hns_roce_v1_hw.c and hns_roce_v1_hw.h are files for
>> hardware-specific operations only for v1 engine, and other files(.c and .h)
>> for common algorithm and common hardware operations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <oulijun@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Hu(Xavier) <xavier.huwei@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Znlong <zhaonenglong@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> MAINTAINERS | 8 +
>> drivers/infiniband/Kconfig | 1 +
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/Kconfig | 10 +
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/Makefile | 9 +
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_ah.c | 110 +
>
> We are not adding name of company (hisilicon) for infiniband HW drivers
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_ah.c
> --->
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_ah.c
>
Surely, i will modify the location of RoCE driver code after disscussed in next patch
>
>> .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_alloc.c | 239 ++
> ^^^^^^
> Please fix you paths.
>
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_cmd.c | 338 +++
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_cmd.h | 80 +
>> .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_common.h | 308 +++
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_cq.c | 436 +++
>> .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_device.h | 794 ++++++
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_eq.c | 758 ++++++
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_eq.h | 132 +
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_icm.c | 578 ++++
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_icm.h | 112 +
>> .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_main.c | 1097 ++++++++
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_mr.c | 605 +++++
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_pd.c | 124 +
>> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_qp.c | 841 ++++++
>> .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_user.h | 31 +
>> .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_v1_hw.c | 2832 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_v1_hw.h | 985 +++++++
> ^^^^^^
> Do you support v1 of RoCE or v1 of your HW?
>
Here, v1 stands for hw, that is, we support v1 of our hw.
>> 23 files changed, 10429 insertions(+)
>
> Please appreciate the effort needed to review such large patch and
> invest time and effort to divide this to number of small easy review patches.
>
Surely, i have pay attention to the patch, but i consider that it is not better to
split the patch into small patch. because it will the base function of RoCE.
For your advice, i will make further efforts to taking a discussion how to reslove the question.
thanks
Lijun Ou
> .
>
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Leon Romanovsky <leon@leon.nu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-05 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rkBfd-61Y-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1371285 |
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:32:53PM +0800, oulijun wrote: > >> .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_v1_hw.c | 2832 ++++++++++++++++++++ > >> .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_v1_hw.h | 985 +++++++ > > ^^^^^^ > > Do you support v1 of RoCE or v1 of your HW? > > > Here, v1 stands for hw, that is, we support v1 of our hw. So you should write hns_roce_hw_v1 and not hns_roce_v1_hw > >> 23 files changed, 10429 insertions(+) > > > > Please appreciate the effort needed to review such large patch and > > invest time and effort to divide this to number of small easy review patches. > > > Surely, i have pay attention to the patch, but i consider that it is not better to > split the patch into small patch. because it will the base function of RoCE. > For your advice, i will make further efforts to taking a discussion how to reslove the question. Faisal Latif's submission [1] can help you to get inspiration. Also please DON'T submit your patches till you get rid of unrelated functions/macros/defines and DMA operations for register access. [1] https://lwn.net/Articles/668721/ > > thanks > Lijun Ou > > . > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web