Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1371285 > unrolled thread

Re: [RESEND PATCH V4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support

Started byoulijun <oulijun@huawei.com>
First post2016-04-05 09:40 +0200
Last post2016-04-05 17:40 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [RESEND PATCH V4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support oulijun <oulijun@huawei.com> - 2016-04-05 09:40 +0200
    Re: [RESEND PATCH V4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support Leon Romanovsky <leon@leon.nu> - 2016-04-05 17:40 +0200

#1371285 — Re: [RESEND PATCH V4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support

Fromoulijun <oulijun@huawei.com>
Date2016-04-05 09:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [RESEND PATCH V4 2/3] IB/hns: Add HiSilicon RoCE driver support
Message-ID<rktKF-89N-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi,  Leon Romanovsky
On 2016/4/2 9:58, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:21:31PM +0800, Lijun Ou wrote:
>> The driver for HiSilicon RoCE is a platform driver.
>> The driver will support multiple versions of hardware. Currently only "v1"
>> for hip06 SoC is supported.
>> The driver includes two parts: common driver and hardware-specific
>> operations. hns_roce_v1_hw.c and hns_roce_v1_hw.h are files for
>> hardware-specific operations only for v1 engine, and other files(.c and .h)
>> for common algorithm and common hardware operations.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou <oulijun@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Hu(Xavier) <xavier.huwei@huawei.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Znlong <zhaonenglong@huawei.com>
>> ---
>>  MAINTAINERS                                        |    8 +
>>  drivers/infiniband/Kconfig                         |    1 +
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/Makefile                     |    1 +
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/Kconfig        |   10 +
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/Makefile       |    9 +
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_ah.c  |  110 +
> 
> We are not adding name of company (hisilicon) for infiniband HW drivers
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_ah.c
> --->
> drivers/infiniband/hw/hns/hns_roce_ah.c
>
Surely, i will modify the location of RoCE driver code after disscussed in next patch

> 
>>  .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_alloc.c   |  239 ++
>  ^^^^^^
> Please fix you paths.
> 
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_cmd.c |  338 +++
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_cmd.h |   80 +
>>  .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_common.h  |  308 +++
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_cq.c  |  436 +++
>>  .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_device.h  |  794 ++++++
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_eq.c  |  758 ++++++
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_eq.h  |  132 +
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_icm.c |  578 ++++
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_icm.h |  112 +
>>  .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_main.c    | 1097 ++++++++
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_mr.c  |  605 +++++
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_pd.c  |  124 +
>>  drivers/infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_qp.c  |  841 ++++++
>>  .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_user.h    |   31 +
>>  .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_v1_hw.c   | 2832 ++++++++++++++++++++
>>  .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_v1_hw.h   |  985 +++++++
>                                           ^^^^^^
> Do you support v1 of RoCE or v1 of your HW?
> 
Here, v1 stands for hw, that is, we support v1 of our hw.
>>  23 files changed, 10429 insertions(+)
> 
> Please appreciate the effort needed to review such large patch and
> invest time and effort to divide this to number of small easy review patches.
> 
    Surely, i have pay attention to the patch, but i consider that it is not better to
split the patch into small patch. because it will the base function of RoCE.
    For your advice, i will make further efforts to taking a discussion how to reslove the question.

thanks
Lijun Ou
> .
> 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1371733

FromLeon Romanovsky <leon@leon.nu>
Date2016-04-05 17:40 +0200
Message-ID<rkBfd-61Y-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1371285
On Tue, Apr 05, 2016 at 03:32:53PM +0800, oulijun wrote:
> >>  .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_v1_hw.c   | 2832 ++++++++++++++++++++
> >>  .../infiniband/hw/hisilicon/hns/hns_roce_v1_hw.h   |  985 +++++++
> >                                           ^^^^^^
> > Do you support v1 of RoCE or v1 of your HW?
> > 
> Here, v1 stands for hw, that is, we support v1 of our hw.

So you should write hns_roce_hw_v1 and not hns_roce_v1_hw

> >>  23 files changed, 10429 insertions(+)
> > 
> > Please appreciate the effort needed to review such large patch and
> > invest time and effort to divide this to number of small easy review patches.
> > 
>     Surely, i have pay attention to the patch, but i consider that it is not better to
> split the patch into small patch. because it will the base function of RoCE.
>     For your advice, i will make further efforts to taking a discussion how to reslove the question.

Faisal Latif's submission [1] can help you to get inspiration.

Also please DON'T submit your patches till you get rid of unrelated
functions/macros/defines and DMA operations for register access.

[1] https://lwn.net/Articles/668721/

> 
> thanks
> Lijun Ou
> > .
> > 
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web