Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1371076 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/writeback: correct dirty page calculation for highmem

Started byJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
First post2016-04-05 03:40 +0200
Last post2016-04-05 05:50 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/writeback: correct dirty page calculation for  highmem Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> - 2016-04-05 03:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/writeback: correct dirty page calculation for highmem "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-04-05 05:50 +0200

#1371076 — Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/writeback: correct dirty page calculation for highmem

FromJoonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
Date2016-04-05 03:40 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] mm/writeback: correct dirty page calculation for highmem
Message-ID<rko8h-3C9-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 11:10:07AM +0900, js1304@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> 
> ZONE_MOVABLE could be treated as highmem so we need to consider it for
> accurate calculation of dirty pages. And, in following patches, ZONE_CMA
> will be introduced and it can be treated as highmem, too. So, instead of
> manually adding stat of ZONE_MOVABLE, looping all zones and check whether
> the zone is highmem or not and add stat of the zone which can be treated
> as highmem.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
> ---
>  mm/page-writeback.c | 8 ++++++--
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Hello, Andrew.

Could you review and merge these simple fixup and cleanup patches?
I'd like to send ZONE_CMA patchset v2 based on linux-next after this
series is merged to linux-next.

Thanks.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1371175 — Re: [PATCH 1/4] mm/writeback: correct dirty page calculation for highmem

From"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date2016-04-05 05:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/4] mm/writeback: correct dirty page calculation for highmem
Message-ID<rkqa6-5dS-19@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1371076
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> writes:

> [ text/plain ]
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 11:10:07AM +0900, js1304@gmail.com wrote:
>> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>> 
>> ZONE_MOVABLE could be treated as highmem so we need to consider it for
>> accurate calculation of dirty pages. And, in following patches, ZONE_CMA
>> will be introduced and it can be treated as highmem, too. So, instead of
>> manually adding stat of ZONE_MOVABLE, looping all zones and check whether
>> the zone is highmem or not and add stat of the zone which can be treated
>> as highmem.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com>
>> ---
>>  mm/page-writeback.c | 8 ++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> Hello, Andrew.
>
> Could you review and merge these simple fixup and cleanup patches?
> I'd like to send ZONE_CMA patchset v2 based on linux-next after this
> series is merged to linux-next.
>

I searched with ZONE_HIGHMEM and AFAICS this series do handle all the
highmem path.

For the series:
Reviewed-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

-aneesh

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web