Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1370909 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH] clk: sunxi: Add CSI (camera's Sensors Interface) module clock driver for sun[457]i

Started byMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
First post2016-04-04 23:30 +0200
Last post2016-04-04 23:30 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH] clk: sunxi: Add CSI (camera's Sensors Interface) module  clock driver for sun[457]i Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2016-04-04 23:30 +0200

#1370909 — Re: [PATCH] clk: sunxi: Add CSI (camera's Sensors Interface) module clock driver for sun[457]i

FromMaxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>
Date2016-04-04 23:30 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] clk: sunxi: Add CSI (camera's Sensors Interface) module clock driver for sun[457]i
Message-ID<rkken-Rn-13@gated-at.bofh.it>

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Hi Stephen

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 06:14:36PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 03/19, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 07:43:42PM +1100, yassinjaffer@gmail.com wrote:
> > > From: Yassin Jaffer <yassinjaffer@gmail.com>
> > > 
> > > This patch adds a composite clock type consisting of
> > > a clock gate, mux, configurable dividers, and a reset control.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Yassin Jaffer <yassinjaffer@gmail.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt |   1 +
> > 
> > I wish someone would just add all the sunxi clocks in one pass instead 
> > of one by one.
> > 
> > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> 
> Me too!

I understand, but it's probably not going to happen. The clock tree is
massive, and obviously you have to multiply that by the number of SoCs
we have.

And to be honest, I don't really see the point of merging clock
drivers that have never been tested, and might be massively broken,
especially now that we have this ABI requirement for the DT, and we
can't adjust the binding when we actually start using that clock.

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web