Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1370540 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-04 13:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-04 20:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] gadget: Introduce the usb charger framework Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> - 2016-04-04 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] gadget: Introduce the usb charger framework Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-04-04 18:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] gadget: Introduce the usb charger framework Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-04-04 20:50 +0200
| From | Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 13:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v7 1/4] gadget: Introduce the usb charger framework |
| Message-ID | <rkaoG-1Mz-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes: > On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 08:43:10AM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes: > >> > IIRC Greg didn't want new classes? > >> good point. Still, this doesn't seem to fit a but_type IMO. > > It does in this new world order. IIRC on an earlier round of review > there was some code that didn't use a bus but that got complaints that > it was trying to reimplement the bus functionality. fair enough, I'll wait for Greg to have some time to comment on this. Bottomline is that there is *no* real bus. Charger ICs will use SPI or I2C and that's a real bus, $subject is not. -- balbi
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 18:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rkfeG-5Fz-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1370540 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 01:47:50PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes: > > It does in this new world order. IIRC on an earlier round of review > > there was some code that didn't use a bus but that got complaints that > > it was trying to reimplement the bus functionality. > fair enough, I'll wait for Greg to have some time to comment on > this. Bottomline is that there is *no* real bus. Charger ICs will use I've got a feeling Greg is zoning this out by now... > SPI or I2C and that's a real bus, $subject is not. Well, there's the physical connection between the system power supply and the USB port if you're very keen on looking for hardware.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 20:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rkhJv-7va-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1370724 |
On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 09:04:48AM -0700, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Apr 04, 2016 at 01:47:50PM +0300, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> writes: > > > > It does in this new world order. IIRC on an earlier round of review > > > there was some code that didn't use a bus but that got complaints that > > > it was trying to reimplement the bus functionality. > > > fair enough, I'll wait for Greg to have some time to comment on > > this. Bottomline is that there is *no* real bus. Charger ICs will use > > I've got a feeling Greg is zoning this out by now... Very true :) I have a lot of other patches to go through this week, it will be a while before I get to these... thanks, greg k-h
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web