Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1370363 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-04-04 07:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-04-04 16:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] Documentation: dt-bindings: Document STM32 EXTI controller bindings Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> - 2016-04-04 07:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] Documentation: dt-bindings: Document STM32 EXTI controller bindings Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com> - 2016-04-04 16:40 +0200
| From | Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 07:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] Documentation: dt-bindings: Document STM32 EXTI controller bindings |
| Message-ID | <rk55G-6H0-45@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 05:09:31PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>
> ---
> .../bindings/interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..6e7703d4ff5b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt
> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@
> +STM32 External Interrupt Controller
> +
> +Required properties:
> +
> +- compatible: Should be "st,stm32-exti"
> +- reg: Specifies base physical address and size of the registers
> +- interrupt-controller: Indentifies the node as an interrupt controller
> +- #interrupt-cells: Specifies the number of cells to encode an interrupt
> + specifier, shall be 2
> +- interrupts: interrupts references to primary interrupt controller
Need to define how many and what is the order?
Are these 1:1 mapping? You could use interrupt-map here to define the
mapping.
> +
> +Example:
> +
> +exti: interrupt-controller@40013c00 {
> + compatible = "st,stm32-exti";
> + interrupt-controller;
> + #interrupt-cells = <2>;
> + reg = <0x40013C00 0x400>;
> + interrupts = <1>, <2>, <3>, <6>, <7>, <8>, <9>, <10>, <23>, <40>, <41>, <42>, <62>, <76>;
> +};
> --
> 1.9.1
>
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-04-04 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rkdPB-4mS-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1370363 |
Hi Rob, 2016-04-04 7:15 GMT+02:00 Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>: > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 05:09:31PM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote: >> Signed-off-by: Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com> >> --- >> .../bindings/interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+) >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt >> >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt >> new file mode 100644 >> index 000000000000..6e7703d4ff5b >> --- /dev/null >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/st,stm32-exti.txt >> @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ >> +STM32 External Interrupt Controller >> + >> +Required properties: >> + >> +- compatible: Should be "st,stm32-exti" >> +- reg: Specifies base physical address and size of the registers >> +- interrupt-controller: Indentifies the node as an interrupt controller >> +- #interrupt-cells: Specifies the number of cells to encode an interrupt >> + specifier, shall be 2 >> +- interrupts: interrupts references to primary interrupt controller > > Need to define how many and what is the order? The exti driver uses of_irq_count() to count the number of interrupts. The order doesn't matter in my implementation, I will come back on this point below. > > Are these 1:1 mapping? You could use interrupt-map here to define the > mapping. No, this is not 1:1 mapping. This is the mapping for STM32F429 (With 'n' managed by a mux in Syscfg (from GPIOA to GPIOI)): EXTI0 (GPIOn0) : NVIC 6 EXTI1 (GPIOn1) : NVIC 7 EXTI2 (GPIOn2) : NVIC 8 EXTI3 (GPIOn3) : NVIC 9 EXTI4 (GPIOn4) : NVIC 10 EXTI5 (GPIOn5) : NVIC 23 EXTI6 (GPIOn6) : NVIC 23 EXTI7 (GPIOn7) : NVIC 23 EXTI8 (GPIOn8) : NVIC 23 EXTI9 (GPIOn9) : NVIC 23 EXTI10 (GPIOn10) : NVIC 40 EXTI11 (GPIOn11) : NVIC 40 EXTI12 (GPIOn12) : NVIC 40 EXTI13 (GPIOn13) : NVIC 40 EXTI14 (GPIOn14) : NVIC 40 EXTI15 (GPIOn15) : NVIC 40 EXTI16 (PVD) : NVIC 1 EXTI17 (RTC Alarm) : NVIC 41 EXTI18 (USB OTG FS Wakeup) : NVIC 42 EXTI19 (Ethernet Wakeup) : NVIC 62 EXTI20 (USB OTG HS Wakeup) : NVIC 76 EXTI21 (RTC Tamper) : NVIC 2 EXTI22 (RTC Wakeup) : NVIC 3 Ideally, we should define a kind of mapping in the DT node. However, from what I understand 'interrupt-map' is not intended to be used in an interrupt controller (it would not even be parsed in of_irq_parse_raw()). Any ideas? Thanks for the review, Maxime
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web