Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1362208 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-22 00:20 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-23 12:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-03-22 00:20 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with Linus' tree Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> - 2016-03-23 12:20 +0100
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 00:20 +0100 |
| Subject | linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with Linus' tree |
| Message-ID | <rfhh8-49g-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Catalin,
Today's linux-next merge of the arm64 tree got a conflict in:
arch/arm64/mm/init.c
between commit:
dfd55ad85e4a ("arm64: vmemmap: use virtual projection of linear region")
from Linus' tree and commit:
f09f1bacfe2b ("arm64: Split pr_notice("Virtual kernel memory layout...") into multiple pr_cont()")
from the arm64 tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc arch/arm64/mm/init.c
index 61a38eaf0895,d09603d0e5e9..000000000000
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/init.c
@@@ -362,42 -362,38 +362,38 @@@ void __init mem_init(void
#define MLG(b, t) b, t, ((t) - (b)) >> 30
#define MLK_ROUNDUP(b, t) b, t, DIV_ROUND_UP(((t) - (b)), SZ_1K)
- pr_notice("Virtual kernel memory layout:\n"
+ pr_notice("Virtual kernel memory layout:\n");
#ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
- " kasan : 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld GB)\n"
+ pr_cont(" kasan : 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld GB)\n",
+ MLG(KASAN_SHADOW_START, KASAN_SHADOW_END));
#endif
- " modules : 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld MB)\n"
- " vmalloc : 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld GB)\n"
- " .text : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%6ld KB)\n"
- " .rodata : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%6ld KB)\n"
- " .init : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%6ld KB)\n"
- " .data : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%6ld KB)\n"
+ pr_cont(" modules : 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld MB)\n",
+ MLM(MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END));
+ pr_cont(" vmalloc : 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld GB)\n",
+ MLG(VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END));
+ pr_cont(" .text : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%6ld KB)\n"
+ " .rodata : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%6ld KB)\n"
+ " .init : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%6ld KB)\n"
+ " .data : 0x%p" " - 0x%p" " (%6ld KB)\n",
+ MLK_ROUNDUP(_text, __start_rodata),
+ MLK_ROUNDUP(__start_rodata, _etext),
+ MLK_ROUNDUP(__init_begin, __init_end),
+ MLK_ROUNDUP(_sdata, _edata));
#ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
- " vmemmap : 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld GB maximum)\n"
- " 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld MB actual)\n"
+ pr_cont(" vmemmap : 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld GB maximum)\n"
+ " 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld MB actual)\n",
- MLG((unsigned long)vmemmap,
- (unsigned long)vmemmap + VMEMMAP_SIZE),
++ MLG(VMEMMAP_START,
++ VMEMMAP_START + VMEMMAP_SIZE),
+ MLM((unsigned long)phys_to_page(memblock_start_of_DRAM()),
+ (unsigned long)virt_to_page(high_memory)));
#endif
- " fixed : 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld KB)\n"
- " PCI I/O : 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld MB)\n"
- " memory : 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld MB)\n",
- #ifdef CONFIG_KASAN
- MLG(KASAN_SHADOW_START, KASAN_SHADOW_END),
- #endif
- MLM(MODULES_VADDR, MODULES_END),
- MLG(VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END),
- MLK_ROUNDUP(_text, __start_rodata),
- MLK_ROUNDUP(__start_rodata, _etext),
- MLK_ROUNDUP(__init_begin, __init_end),
- MLK_ROUNDUP(_sdata, _edata),
- #ifdef CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP
- MLG(VMEMMAP_START,
- VMEMMAP_START + VMEMMAP_SIZE),
- MLM((unsigned long)phys_to_page(memblock_start_of_DRAM()),
- (unsigned long)virt_to_page(high_memory)),
- #endif
- MLK(FIXADDR_START, FIXADDR_TOP),
- MLM(PCI_IO_START, PCI_IO_END),
- MLM(__phys_to_virt(memblock_start_of_DRAM()),
- (unsigned long)high_memory));
+ pr_cont(" fixed : 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld KB)\n",
+ MLK(FIXADDR_START, FIXADDR_TOP));
+ pr_cont(" PCI I/O : 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld MB)\n",
+ MLM(PCI_IO_START, PCI_IO_END));
+ pr_cont(" memory : 0x%16lx - 0x%16lx (%6ld MB)\n",
+ MLM(__phys_to_virt(memblock_start_of_DRAM()),
+ (unsigned long)high_memory));
#undef MLK
#undef MLM
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 12:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rfOZr-2wg-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1362208 |
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 10:15:49AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm64 tree got a conflict in:
>
> arch/arm64/mm/init.c
>
> between commit:
>
> dfd55ad85e4a ("arm64: vmemmap: use virtual projection of linear region")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> f09f1bacfe2b ("arm64: Split pr_notice("Virtual kernel memory layout...") into multiple pr_cont()")
>
> from the arm64 tree.
The fix looks fine. Thanks.
--
Catalin
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web