Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1362148 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-21 22:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-23 17:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] Documentation,barriers: Mention smp_cond_acquire() Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> - 2016-03-21 22:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH] Documentation,barriers: Mention smp_cond_acquire() "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-03-23 17:20 +0100
| From | Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 22:10 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] Documentation,barriers: Mention smp_cond_acquire() |
| Message-ID | <rfffk-2ON-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
... do this next to smp_load_acquire when first mentioning
ACQUIRE. While this call is briefly explained and ctrl
dependencies are mentioned later, it does not hurt the reader.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
---
Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
index 3729cbe60e41..2b5ea9d01a8f 100644
--- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
+++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt
@@ -430,8 +430,9 @@ And a couple of implicit varieties:
This acts as a one-way permeable barrier. It guarantees that all memory
operations after the ACQUIRE operation will appear to happen after the
ACQUIRE operation with respect to the other components of the system.
- ACQUIRE operations include LOCK operations and smp_load_acquire()
- operations.
+ ACQUIRE operations include LOCK operations and both smp_load_acquire()
+ and smp_cond_acquire() operations. The later builds the necessary ACQUIRE
+ semantics from relying on a control dependency and smp_rmb().
Memory operations that occur before an ACQUIRE operation may appear to
happen after it completes.
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 17:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rfTFL-60M-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1362148 |
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 02:07:19PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > ... do this next to smp_load_acquire when first mentioning > ACQUIRE. While this call is briefly explained and ctrl > dependencies are mentioned later, it does not hurt the reader. > > Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de> Queued for review, thank you, Davidlohr! Thanx, Paul > --- > Documentation/memory-barriers.txt | 5 +++-- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt > index 3729cbe60e41..2b5ea9d01a8f 100644 > --- a/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt > +++ b/Documentation/memory-barriers.txt > @@ -430,8 +430,9 @@ And a couple of implicit varieties: > This acts as a one-way permeable barrier. It guarantees that all memory > operations after the ACQUIRE operation will appear to happen after the > ACQUIRE operation with respect to the other components of the system. > - ACQUIRE operations include LOCK operations and smp_load_acquire() > - operations. > + ACQUIRE operations include LOCK operations and both smp_load_acquire() > + and smp_cond_acquire() operations. The later builds the necessary ACQUIRE > + semantics from relying on a control dependency and smp_rmb(). > > Memory operations that occur before an ACQUIRE operation may appear to > happen after it completes. > -- > 2.1.4 >
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web