Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1362185 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-21 23:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-23 19:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 4 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] ARM64: meson: GXBaby (S905) and Vega S95 enablement Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2016-03-21 23:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] ARM64: meson: GXBaby (S905) and Vega S95 enablement Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> - 2016-03-22 21:30 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] ARM64: meson: GXBaby (S905) and Vega S95 enablement Carlo Caione <carlo@caione.org> - 2016-03-23 09:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] ARM64: meson: GXBaby (S905) and Vega S95 enablement Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> - 2016-03-23 19:20 +0100
| From | Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 23:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] ARM64: meson: GXBaby (S905) and Vega S95 enablement |
| Message-ID | <rfgEq-3EB-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote: > This series adds initial support for the Amlogic S905 based > Tronsmart Vega S95 Pro, Meta and Telos TV boxes. > > v2: > * Pick up previously acked "tronsmart" patch instead (Matthias) > * Drop ARM_GIC selection (Sudeep) > * Change some compatible strings (Sudeep, André) > * Squash some node changes/additions > > Note: On the Vega S95 I need to change TEXT_OFFSET as follows, > in order to avoid the vendor U-Boot overwriting itself (fwiu); > for the Mini Mx that's reportedly not necessary. FYI, the Amlogic P200 dev board also needs this hack with the factory u-boot. Kevin
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-22 21:30 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v2 0/6] ARM64: meson: GXBaby (S905) and Vega S95 enablement |
| Message-ID | <rfB6b-1hK-43@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1362185 |
Am 21.03.2016 um 23:36 schrieb Kevin Hilman: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote: > >> Note: On the Vega S95 I need to change TEXT_OFFSET as follows, >> in order to avoid the vendor U-Boot overwriting itself (fwiu); >> for the Mini Mx that's reportedly not necessary. > > FYI, the Amlogic P200 dev board also needs this hack with the factory u-boot. I have meanwhile found that mkimage -A arm64 -O linux -T kernel -C none -a 0x1080000 -e 0x1080000 \ -n linux-next -d arch/arm64/boot/Image ../uImage and then using bootm instead of booti works even without the above hack on the Vega S95. Not a satisfactory solution yet, but better than patching the kernel in a distro-incompatible way. Regards, Andreas -- SUSE Linux GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany GF: Felix Imendörffer, Jane Smithard, Graham Norton; HRB 21284 (AG Nürnberg)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Carlo Caione <carlo@caione.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 09:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rfM1A-ze-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1362958 |
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 9:29 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote: > Am 21.03.2016 um 23:36 schrieb Kevin Hilman: >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote: >> >>> Note: On the Vega S95 I need to change TEXT_OFFSET as follows, >>> in order to avoid the vendor U-Boot overwriting itself (fwiu); >>> for the Mini Mx that's reportedly not necessary. >> >> FYI, the Amlogic P200 dev board also needs this hack with the factory u-boot. > > I have meanwhile found that > > mkimage -A arm64 -O linux -T kernel -C none -a 0x1080000 -e 0x1080000 \ > -n linux-next -d arch/arm64/boot/Image ../uImage > > and then using bootm instead of booti works even without the above hack > on the Vega S95. Not a satisfactory solution yet, but better than > patching the kernel in a distro-incompatible way. I wonder if we can add this kind of information in Documentation/arm/meson/. Probably it could be handy until we have a proper u-boot porting. -- Carlo Caione
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Kevin Hilman <khilman@baylibre.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-23 19:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rfVxT-7n0-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1362958 |
Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> writes: > Am 21.03.2016 um 23:36 schrieb Kevin Hilman: >> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Andreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote: >> >>> Note: On the Vega S95 I need to change TEXT_OFFSET as follows, >>> in order to avoid the vendor U-Boot overwriting itself (fwiu); >>> for the Mini Mx that's reportedly not necessary. >> >> FYI, the Amlogic P200 dev board also needs this hack with the factory u-boot. > > I have meanwhile found that > > mkimage -A arm64 -O linux -T kernel -C none -a 0x1080000 -e 0x1080000 \ > -n linux-next -d arch/arm64/boot/Image ../uImage > > and then using bootm instead of booti works even without the above hack > on the Vega S95. Not a satisfactory solution yet, but better than > patching the kernel in a distro-incompatible way. Thanks for sharing. I can confirm this is working for me too. Kevin
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web