Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1360783 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-18 17:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-21 20:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 6 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: uniphier: UniPhier updates for Linux 4.6-rc1 (2nd round) Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-03-18 17:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: uniphier: UniPhier updates for Linux 4.6-rc1 (2nd round) Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-03-19 00:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: uniphier: UniPhier updates for Linux 4.6-rc1 (2nd round) Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-03-21 05:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: uniphier: UniPhier updates for Linux 4.6-rc1 (2nd round) Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-03-21 10:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: uniphier: UniPhier updates for Linux 4.6-rc1 (2nd round) Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> - 2016-03-21 13:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: uniphier: UniPhier updates for Linux 4.6-rc1 (2nd round) Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-03-21 20:40 +0100
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-18 17:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: uniphier: UniPhier updates for Linux 4.6-rc1 (2nd round) |
| Message-ID | <re5L3-23u-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tuesday 15 March 2016 11:01:00 Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Olof, Arnd, > > > I sent my patches around -rc4 and > took action soon as requested. > > But, my series is still not applied due to the long silence on your side. > > Please respond! Sorry for all the delays, we screwed this one up, and you did everything right. I have put the DT changes into the next/dt2 branch now, and applied the two other patches to next/soc directly. Please check that the for-next branch in arm-soc has everything you need now. Arnd
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-19 00:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: uniphier: UniPhier updates for Linux 4.6-rc1 (2nd round) |
| Message-ID | <recjv-3U8-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1360783 |
Hi Arnd, 2016-03-19 1:49 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>: > On Tuesday 15 March 2016 11:01:00 Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> Olof, Arnd, >> >> >> I sent my patches around -rc4 and >> took action soon as requested. >> >> But, my series is still not applied due to the long silence on your side. >> >> Please respond! > > Sorry for all the delays, we screwed this one up, and you did everything > right. I have put the DT changes into the next/dt2 branch now, and applied > the two other patches to next/soc directly. > > Please check that the for-next branch in arm-soc has everything you need now. > I checked both branch and everything is fine. Thanks you very much! -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 05:00 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: uniphier: UniPhier updates for Linux 4.6-rc1 (2nd round) |
| Message-ID | <reZax-8rr-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1361012 |
Hi Arnd, 2016-03-19 8:49 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>: > Hi Arnd, > > 2016-03-19 1:49 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>: >> On Tuesday 15 March 2016 11:01:00 Masahiro Yamada wrote: >>> Olof, Arnd, >>> >>> >>> I sent my patches around -rc4 and >>> took action soon as requested. >>> >>> But, my series is still not applied due to the long silence on your side. >>> >>> Please respond! >> >> Sorry for all the delays, we screwed this one up, and you did everything >> right. I have put the DT changes into the next/dt2 branch now, and applied >> the two other patches to next/soc directly. >> >> Please check that the for-next branch in arm-soc has everything you need now. >> > > I checked both branch and everything is fine. > > Thanks you very much! I thought you'd include DT updates in the pull requests, but you didn't. Why was next/dt2 missed? -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 10:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rf4Df-3Gc-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1361488 |
On Monday 21 March 2016 12:59:20 Masahiro Yamada wrote: > > I thought you'd include DT updates in the pull requests, > but you didn't. > > Why was next/dt2 missed? This is the branch that I pulled in some patches last, I'm going to send it in a couple of days, after it has been in linux-next. It should be there in the end. Arnd
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 13:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] ARM: uniphier: UniPhier updates for Linux 4.6-rc1 (2nd round) |
| Message-ID | <rf7hM-5EJ-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1361638 |
Hi Arnd, 2016-03-21 18:49 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>: > On Monday 21 March 2016 12:59:20 Masahiro Yamada wrote: >> >> I thought you'd include DT updates in the pull requests, >> but you didn't. >> >> Why was next/dt2 missed? > > This is the branch that I pulled in some patches last, I'm going to send > it in a couple of days, after it has been in linux-next. It should be there > in the end. I did not know this. That'll be great. Sorry for poking you again and again. -- Best Regards Masahiro Yamada
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-21 20:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rfdQe-1Ku-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1361788 |
On Monday 21 March 2016 21:39:31 Masahiro Yamada wrote: > Hi Arnd, > > 2016-03-21 18:49 GMT+09:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>: > > On Monday 21 March 2016 12:59:20 Masahiro Yamada wrote: > >> > >> I thought you'd include DT updates in the pull requests, > >> but you didn't. > >> > >> Why was next/dt2 missed? > > > > This is the branch that I pulled in some patches last, I'm going to send > > it in a couple of days, after it has been in linux-next. It should be there > > in the end. > > I did not know this. > That'll be great. > > Sorry for poking you again and again. Nothing wrong on your end. Generally it's a good idea to remind us if you send patches and nothing happens after a week, or you are unsure whether we actually did what we said we'd do (as in this case). I should really have been clearer in the pull request message about the fact that there is still some part missing. Arnd
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web