Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1359117 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-16 17:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-17 11:50 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH v4 02/13] clk: sunxi: add ahb1 clock for A83T Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@gmail.com> - 2016-03-16 17:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v4 02/13] clk: sunxi: add ahb1 clock for A83T Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2016-03-17 11:50 +0100
| From | Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 17:10 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v4 02/13] clk: sunxi: add ahb1 clock for A83T |
| Message-ID | <rdmbg-2Nj-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
AHB1 on A83T is similar to ahb1 on A31, except parents are different.
clock index 0b1x is PLL6.
Signed-off-by: Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt | 1 +
drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
index 834436f..cba9fe55 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ Required properties:
"allwinner,sun6i-a31-ar100-clk" - for the AR100 on A31
"allwinner,sun9i-a80-cpus-clk" - for the CPUS on A80
"allwinner,sun6i-a31-ahb1-clk" - for the AHB1 clock on A31
+ "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-ahb1-clk" - for the AHB1 clock on A83T
"allwinner,sun8i-h3-ahb2-clk" - for the AHB2 clock on H3
"allwinner,sun6i-a31-ahb1-gates-clk" - for the AHB1 gates on A31
"allwinner,sun8i-a23-ahb1-gates-clk" - for the AHB1 gates on A23
diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
index 91de0a0..a7aab65 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
@@ -344,6 +344,67 @@ static void sun6i_ahb1_recalc(struct factors_request *req)
req->rate >>= req->p;
}
+#define SUN8I_A83T_AHB1_PARENT_PLL6 2
+/**
+ * sun8i_a83t_get_ahb_factors() - calculates m, p factors for AHB
+ * AHB rate is calculated as follows
+ * rate = parent_rate >> p
+ *
+ * if parent is pll6, then
+ * parent_rate = pll6 rate / (m + 1)
+ */
+
+static void sun8i_a83t_get_ahb1_factors(struct factors_request *req)
+{
+ u8 div, calcp, calcm = 1;
+
+ /*
+ * clock can only divide, so we will never be able to achieve
+ * frequencies higher than the parent frequency
+ */
+ if (req->parent_rate && req->rate > req->parent_rate)
+ req->rate = req->parent_rate;
+
+ div = DIV_ROUND_UP(req->parent_rate, req->rate);
+
+ /* calculate pre-divider if parent is pll6 */
+ if (req->parent_index >= SUN8I_A83T_AHB1_PARENT_PLL6) {
+ if (div < 4)
+ calcp = 0;
+ else if (div / 2 < 4)
+ calcp = 1;
+ else if (div / 4 < 4)
+ calcp = 2;
+ else
+ calcp = 3;
+
+ calcm = DIV_ROUND_UP(div, 1 << calcp);
+ } else {
+ calcp = __roundup_pow_of_two(div);
+ calcp = calcp > 3 ? 3 : calcp;
+ }
+
+ req->rate = (req->parent_rate / calcm) >> calcp;
+ req->p = calcp;
+ req->m = calcm - 1;
+}
+
+/**
+* sun8i_a83t_ahb1_recalc() - calculates AHB clock rate from m, p factors and
+* parent index
+*/
+static void sun8i_a83t_ahb1_recalc(struct factors_request *req)
+{
+ req->rate = req->parent_rate;
+
+/* apply pre-divider first if parent is pll6 */
+ if (req->parent_index >= SUN6I_AHB1_PARENT_PLL6)
+ req->rate /= req->m + 1;
+
+ /* clk divider */
+ req->rate >>= req->p;
+}
+
/**
* sun4i_get_apb1_factors() - calculates m, p factors for APB1
* APB1 rate is calculated as follows
@@ -555,6 +616,14 @@ static const struct factors_data sun6i_ahb1_data __initconst = {
.recalc = sun6i_ahb1_recalc,
};
+static const struct factors_data sun8i_a83t_ahb1_data __initconst = {
+ .mux = 12,
+ .muxmask = BIT(1) | BIT(0),
+ .table = &sun6i_ahb1_config,
+ .getter = sun8i_a83t_get_ahb1_factors,
+ .recalc = sun8i_a83t_ahb1_recalc,
+};
+
static const struct factors_data sun4i_apb1_data __initconst = {
.mux = 24,
.muxmask = BIT(1) | BIT(0),
@@ -627,6 +696,13 @@ static void __init sun6i_ahb1_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun6i_a31_ahb1, "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ahb1-clk",
sun6i_ahb1_clk_setup);
+static void __init sun8i_a83t_ahb1_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
+{
+ sunxi_factors_clk_setup(node, &sun8i_a83t_ahb1_data);
+}
+CLK_OF_DECLARE(sun8i_a83t_ahb1, "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-ahb1-clk",
+ sun8i_a83t_ahb1_clk_setup);
+
static void __init sun4i_apb1_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
{
sunxi_factors_clk_setup(node, &sun4i_apb1_data);
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-17 11:50 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rdDF8-6fy-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1359117 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 12:04:25AM +0800, Vishnu Patekar wrote:
> AHB1 on A83T is similar to ahb1 on A31, except parents are different.
> clock index 0b1x is PLL6.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vishnu Patekar <vishnupatekar0510@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>
> Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt | 1 +
> drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 77 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
> index 834436f..cba9fe55 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/clock/sunxi.txt
> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ Required properties:
> "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ar100-clk" - for the AR100 on A31
> "allwinner,sun9i-a80-cpus-clk" - for the CPUS on A80
> "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ahb1-clk" - for the AHB1 clock on A31
> + "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-ahb1-clk" - for the AHB1 clock on A83T
> "allwinner,sun8i-h3-ahb2-clk" - for the AHB2 clock on H3
> "allwinner,sun6i-a31-ahb1-gates-clk" - for the AHB1 gates on A31
> "allwinner,sun8i-a23-ahb1-gates-clk" - for the AHB1 gates on A23
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> index 91de0a0..a7aab65 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk-sunxi.c
> @@ -344,6 +344,67 @@ static void sun6i_ahb1_recalc(struct factors_request *req)
> req->rate >>= req->p;
> }
>
> +#define SUN8I_A83T_AHB1_PARENT_PLL6 2
> +/**
> + * sun8i_a83t_get_ahb_factors() - calculates m, p factors for AHB
> + * AHB rate is calculated as follows
> + * rate = parent_rate >> p
> + *
> + * if parent is pll6, then
> + * parent_rate = pll6 rate / (m + 1)
> + */
> +
> +static void sun8i_a83t_get_ahb1_factors(struct factors_request *req)
> +{
> + u8 div, calcp, calcm = 1;
> +
> + /*
> + * clock can only divide, so we will never be able to achieve
> + * frequencies higher than the parent frequency
> + */
> + if (req->parent_rate && req->rate > req->parent_rate)
> + req->rate = req->parent_rate;
> +
> + div = DIV_ROUND_UP(req->parent_rate, req->rate);
> +
> + /* calculate pre-divider if parent is pll6 */
> + if (req->parent_index >= SUN8I_A83T_AHB1_PARENT_PLL6) {
> + if (div < 4)
> + calcp = 0;
> + else if (div / 2 < 4)
> + calcp = 1;
> + else if (div / 4 < 4)
> + calcp = 2;
> + else
> + calcp = 3;
> +
> + calcm = DIV_ROUND_UP(div, 1 << calcp);
> + } else {
> + calcp = __roundup_pow_of_two(div);
> + calcp = calcp > 3 ? 3 : calcp;
> + }
> +
> + req->rate = (req->parent_rate / calcm) >> calcp;
> + req->p = calcp;
> + req->m = calcm - 1;
> +}
> +
> +/**
> +* sun8i_a83t_ahb1_recalc() - calculates AHB clock rate from m, p factors and
> +* parent index
> +*/
> +static void sun8i_a83t_ahb1_recalc(struct factors_request *req)
> +{
> + req->rate = req->parent_rate;
> +
> +/* apply pre-divider first if parent is pll6 */
The comment indentation is wrong
> + if (req->parent_index >= SUN6I_AHB1_PARENT_PLL6)
And this is not the right define you're using.
I still believe that duplicating the same logic just because of
different dividers is not the way to go.
You could solve that easily by adding a table for the muxes, and
associate it with parents and dividers, that you could store in
clk_factors.
Maxime
--
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web