Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1357178 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-14 12:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-15 01:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: consolidate lock/unlock into unlock_wait Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org> - 2016-03-14 12:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: consolidate lock/unlock into unlock_wait Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> - 2016-03-15 01:20 +0100
| From | Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-14 12:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: consolidate lock/unlock into unlock_wait |
| Message-ID | <rczay-3ce-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The spin_lock()/spin_unlock() is synchronizing on the
nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock which is equivalent to
spin_unlock_wait() but the later should be more efficient.
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Mc Guire <hofrat@osadl.org>
---
Patch was compile tested with: x86_64_defconfig (implies CONFIG_NETFILTER=y)
Simple run test on x86 64 with a few trivial ipfilter rules active.
Patch is against linux-next (localversion-next is next-20160311)
net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c | 6 ++----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
index f60b4fd..afde5f5 100644
--- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
+++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_core.c
@@ -74,8 +74,7 @@ void nf_conntrack_lock(spinlock_t *lock) __acquires(lock)
spin_lock(lock);
while (unlikely(nf_conntrack_locks_all)) {
spin_unlock(lock);
- spin_lock(&nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock);
- spin_unlock(&nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock);
+ spin_unlock_wait(&nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock);
spin_lock(lock);
}
}
@@ -121,8 +120,7 @@ static void nf_conntrack_all_lock(void)
nf_conntrack_locks_all = true;
for (i = 0; i < CONNTRACK_LOCKS; i++) {
- spin_lock(&nf_conntrack_locks[i]);
- spin_unlock(&nf_conntrack_locks[i]);
+ spin_unlock_wait(&nf_conntrack_locks[i]);
}
}
--
2.1.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-15 01:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: nf_conntrack: consolidate lock/unlock into unlock_wait |
| Message-ID | <rcKSm-2ES-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1357178 |
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:39:02PM +0100, Nicholas Mc Guire wrote: > The spin_lock()/spin_unlock() is synchronizing on the > nf_conntrack_locks_all_lock which is equivalent to > spin_unlock_wait() but the later should be more efficient. Applied, thanks.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web