Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1353057 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/74] 4.4.5-stable review

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/74] 4.4.5-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-03-08 14:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/74] 4.4.5-stable review Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-03-08 17:20 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/74] 4.4.5-stable review Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-03-13 04:50 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/74] 4.4.5-stable review Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 11:30 +0100

#1353057 — Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/74] 4.4.5-stable review

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:12:13AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> I tested with my usual setup/config.
> 
> Looks good so far.
> 
> Missing some net-ppp-fixes / overlayfs-fixes / userfaultfd-fixes, but
> I guess you will pick them up in a 6th run of Linux v4.4.y.

I have no idea what these "fixes" are you speak of, my queue is empty,
there are no known stable patches I haven't applied yet.  What exactly
are you referring to here?

thansk,

greg k-h

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1353186

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:12:13AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> Hi Greg,
>>
>> I tested with my usual setup/config.
>>
>> Looks good so far.
>>
>> Missing some net-ppp-fixes / overlayfs-fixes / userfaultfd-fixes, but
>> I guess you will pick them up in a 6th run of Linux v4.4.y.
>
> I have no idea what these "fixes" are you speak of, my queue is empty,
> there are no known stable patches I haven't applied yet.  What exactly
> are you referring to here?
>
> thansk,
>
>

Here we go...

[1] "userfaultfd: don't block on the last VM updates at exit time"

[2] "ppp: release rtnl mutex when interface creation fails"

( I was involved in... Fixes: 58a89ecaca53 ("ppp: fix lockdep splat in
ppp_dev_uninit()" )

[3] "ovl: fix working on distributed fs as lower layer"

BTW, in [1] Linus forgot to add a "CC:stable", how is this handled
when a maintainer forgets this?
Once I read something like "CC:stable # Backport to all applicable
versions". Is that "allowed"?
And yes, netdev has its own rules, so - no comments on this.

- Sedat -

[1] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=39680f50ae54cbbb6e72ac38b8329dd3eb9105f4
[2] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=6faac63a6986f29ef39827f460edd3a5ba64ad5c
[3] http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=b5891cfab08fe3144a616e8e734df7749fb3b7d0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1356603

On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:15:13PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:12:13AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> Hi Greg,
> >>
> >> I tested with my usual setup/config.
> >>
> >> Looks good so far.
> >>
> >> Missing some net-ppp-fixes / overlayfs-fixes / userfaultfd-fixes, but
> >> I guess you will pick them up in a 6th run of Linux v4.4.y.
> >
> > I have no idea what these "fixes" are you speak of, my queue is empty,
> > there are no known stable patches I haven't applied yet.  What exactly
> > are you referring to here?
> >
> > thansk,
> >
> >
> 
> Here we go...
> 
> [1] "userfaultfd: don't block on the last VM updates at exit time"
> 
> [2] "ppp: release rtnl mutex when interface creation fails"
> 
> ( I was involved in... Fixes: 58a89ecaca53 ("ppp: fix lockdep splat in
> ppp_dev_uninit()" )
> 
> [3] "ovl: fix working on distributed fs as lower layer"
> 
> BTW, in [1] Linus forgot to add a "CC:stable", how is this handled
> when a maintainer forgets this?

Someone needs to tell me.  I've grabbed it now, the networking one will
come through David, and the ovl patch is already in my tree for this
round of releases.  I couldn't take it before as it wasn't in Linus's
tree.

thanks,

greg k-h

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1356665

On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 4:45 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 05:15:13PM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 2:39 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
>> <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 10:12:13AM +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> >> Hi Greg,
>> >>
>> >> I tested with my usual setup/config.
>> >>
>> >> Looks good so far.
>> >>
>> >> Missing some net-ppp-fixes / overlayfs-fixes / userfaultfd-fixes, but
>> >> I guess you will pick them up in a 6th run of Linux v4.4.y.
>> >
>> > I have no idea what these "fixes" are you speak of, my queue is empty,
>> > there are no known stable patches I haven't applied yet.  What exactly
>> > are you referring to here?
>> >
>> > thansk,
>> >
>> >
>>
>> Here we go...
>>
>> [1] "userfaultfd: don't block on the last VM updates at exit time"
>>
>> [2] "ppp: release rtnl mutex when interface creation fails"
>>
>> ( I was involved in... Fixes: 58a89ecaca53 ("ppp: fix lockdep splat in
>> ppp_dev_uninit()" )
>>
>> [3] "ovl: fix working on distributed fs as lower layer"
>>
>> BTW, in [1] Linus forgot to add a "CC:stable", how is this handled
>> when a maintainer forgets this?
>
> Someone needs to tell me.  I've grabbed it now, the networking one will
> come through David, and the ovl patch is already in my tree for this
> round of releases.  I couldn't take it before as it wasn't in Linus's
> tree.
>
> thanks,
>

Thanks for the feedback!

- Sedat -

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web