Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1354175 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 00/50] pinctrl: Add and use devm_ apis for pinctrl_{register, unregister}

Started byLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
First post2016-03-09 15:40 +0100
Last post2016-03-16 14:10 +0100
Articles 4 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 00/50] pinctrl: Add and use devm_ apis for pinctrl_{register,  unregister} Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-09 15:40 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 00/50] pinctrl: Add and use devm_ apis for  pinctrl_{register, unregister} Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-03-15 09:40 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 00/50] pinctrl: Add and use devm_ apis for pinctrl_{register,  unregister} Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> - 2016-03-15 14:40 +0100
        Re: [PATCH 00/50] pinctrl: Add and use devm_ apis for  pinctrl_{register, unregister} Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-03-16 14:10 +0100

#1354175 — Re: [PATCH 00/50] pinctrl: Add and use devm_ apis for pinctrl_{register, unregister}

FromLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Date2016-03-09 15:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/50] pinctrl: Add and use devm_ apis for pinctrl_{register, unregister}
Message-ID<raNrk-Hp-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Linus,

On Sunday 28 February 2016 08:14 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>
> On Thursday 25 February 2016 07:43 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 2:15 PM, Laxman Dewangan 
>> <ldewangan@nvidia.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Add resource manageemnt APIs fro pinctrl_register() and 
>>> pinctrl_unregister()
>>> and use these new APIs on hw driver to reduce the error path code and
>>> remove callback for driver.
>> As you can probably guess I like this too, so wait a while, collect ACKs
>> and send me a branch to pull for this too.
>>
> Got lots of ack/reviewed by and captured all. Also did code changes 
> per review:
> - Optimizing in devm_ apis.
> - Correcting the description of devm_ apis.
> - Simplifying probe in digicolor.
> - Removing unwanted pfc->pinctrl in ish.
>
> Pushed the change at:
> Branch "devm_pinctrl_register" of 
> https://github.com/ldewangan/linux-upstream.git.
>
> Base repo is
> for-next of 
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git
>
>
> If required, I can send the V2 version of list with acks.
>

Let me know if I need to send full series (V2 with collected ack) again 
or fine to pull it from above location.


Thanks,
Laxman

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1357897 — Re: [PATCH 00/50] pinctrl: Add and use devm_ apis for pinctrl_{register, unregister}

FromLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date2016-03-15 09:40 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/50] pinctrl: Add and use devm_ apis for pinctrl_{register, unregister}
Message-ID<rcSGe-81d-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1354175
On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> wrote:

>> Pushed the change at:
>> Branch "devm_pinctrl_register" of
>> https://github.com/ldewangan/linux-upstream.git.
>>
>> Base repo is
>> for-next of
>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git
>>
>>
>> If required, I can send the V2 version of list with acks.
>
> Let me know if I need to send full series (V2 with collected ack) again or
> fine to pull it from above location.

Please collect the ACKs on your branch and ask me to pull it after v4.6-rc1.
No need to resend the patches.

Unfortunately it arrived too late for the merge window, but hey: we got the
devm gpiochip in for v4.6.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1358045

FromLaxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
Date2016-03-15 14:40 +0100
Message-ID<rcXmy-2I4-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1357897
On Tuesday 15 March 2016 02:01 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> wrote:
>
>>> Pushed the change at:
>>> Branch "devm_pinctrl_register" of
>>> https://github.com/ldewangan/linux-upstream.git.
>>>
>>> Base repo is
>>> for-next of
>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git
>>>
>>>
>>> If required, I can send the V2 version of list with acks.
>> Let me know if I need to send full series (V2 with collected ack) again or
>> fine to pull it from above location.
> Please collect the ACKs on your branch and ask me to pull it after v4.6-rc1.
> No need to resend the patches.
>
> Unfortunately it arrived too late for the merge window, but hey: we got the
> devm gpiochip in for v4.6.

Thanks for taking the GPIO patches.

Ok, We will do pincontrol post v4.6 and probably, we will have some more 
chnages for using devm_gpio in pincontrol subsystem  as these APIs will 
be available  publicly.

Thanks,
Laxman

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1358966 — Re: [PATCH 00/50] pinctrl: Add and use devm_ apis for pinctrl_{register, unregister}

FromLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Date2016-03-16 14:10 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/50] pinctrl: Add and use devm_ apis for pinctrl_{register, unregister}
Message-ID<rdjn3-Vw-5@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1358045
On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 2:25 PM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com> wrote:
> On Tuesday 15 March 2016 02:01 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 3:23 PM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@nvidia.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>> Pushed the change at:
>>>> Branch "devm_pinctrl_register" of
>>>> https://github.com/ldewangan/linux-upstream.git.
>>>>
>>>> Base repo is
>>>> for-next of
>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/linusw/linux-pinctrl.git
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> If required, I can send the V2 version of list with acks.
>>>
>>> Let me know if I need to send full series (V2 with collected ack) again
>>> or
>>> fine to pull it from above location.
>>
>> Please collect the ACKs on your branch and ask me to pull it after
>> v4.6-rc1.
>> No need to resend the patches.
>>
>> Unfortunately it arrived too late for the merge window, but hey: we got
>> the
>> devm gpiochip in for v4.6.
>
>
> Thanks for taking the GPIO patches.
>
> Ok, We will do pincontrol post v4.6 and probably, we will have some more
> chnages for using devm_gpio in pincontrol subsystem  as these APIs will be
> available  publicly.

Awesome, then we get double the reduction in most cases, this
will look nice. Let's proceed like this.

Yours,
Linus Walleij

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web