Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1356108 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-11 19:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-16 13:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4: Synaptics RMI4 Driver Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 19:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4: Synaptics RMI4 Driver Andrew Duggan <andrew.duggan@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 19:40 +0100
Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4: Synaptics RMI4 Driver Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> - 2016-03-16 13:00 +0100
| From | Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-11 19:10 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v5 00/10] Input: synaptics-rmi4: Synaptics RMI4 Driver |
| Message-ID | <rbzFD-1Ep-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:11:38PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > On Feb 12 2016 or thereabouts, Andrew Duggan wrote: > > On 02/12/2016 04:54 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: > > >On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Andrew Duggan <aduggan@synaptics.com> wrote: > > > > > >>This is the v5 patch series which fixes the issues identified by kbuild > > >>and coccinelle in the previous patch series. These include: > > >> > > >>- Using ARRAY_SIZE instead of a custom macro to calculate the size of the > > >> function handler array. > > >>- Remove setting the .owner field for the driver in rmi_i2c and rmi_spi > > >> since the i2c-core and spi set that field. > > >>- Fix if statment in rmi_f30 which was testing has_led twice instead of > > >> testing has_gpio. > > >Works like a charm. > > >Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > > > > Thanks for testing. At this point except for the touchscreen binding rename > > fix needed in patch 5, all of the outstanding issues have been addressed. If > > the rest of the patch series is acceptable, then I can do a final v6 respin > > which fixes the binding and also removes the HID patch. But, if more work > > needs to be done on the patch series I can wait to do the respin. Dmitry, > > what do you think of the patch series at this point? > > Dmitry, ping on this one... > > I'd like to see the series in 4.6, and we are getting closer of the > merge window. Could we get some of your time on this? I adjusted the binding on patch 5 (to read -x-mm and y-mm) and applied the first 9 leaving the HID out for now. Thanks. -- Dmitry
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Andrew Duggan <andrew.duggan@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-11 19:40 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rbA8G-1R9-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1356108 |
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:11:38PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: >> On Feb 12 2016 or thereabouts, Andrew Duggan wrote: >> > On 02/12/2016 04:54 AM, Linus Walleij wrote: >> > >On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 11:23 PM, Andrew Duggan <aduggan@synaptics.com> wrote: >> > > >> > >>This is the v5 patch series which fixes the issues identified by kbuild >> > >>and coccinelle in the previous patch series. These include: >> > >> >> > >>- Using ARRAY_SIZE instead of a custom macro to calculate the size of the >> > >> function handler array. >> > >>- Remove setting the .owner field for the driver in rmi_i2c and rmi_spi >> > >> since the i2c-core and spi set that field. >> > >>- Fix if statment in rmi_f30 which was testing has_led twice instead of >> > >> testing has_gpio. >> > >Works like a charm. >> > >Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> >> > >> > Thanks for testing. At this point except for the touchscreen binding rename >> > fix needed in patch 5, all of the outstanding issues have been addressed. If >> > the rest of the patch series is acceptable, then I can do a final v6 respin >> > which fixes the binding and also removes the HID patch. But, if more work >> > needs to be done on the patch series I can wait to do the respin. Dmitry, >> > what do you think of the patch series at this point? >> >> Dmitry, ping on this one... >> >> I'd like to see the series in 4.6, and we are getting closer of the >> merge window. Could we get some of your time on this? > > I adjusted the binding on patch 5 (to read -x-mm and y-mm) and applied > the first 9 leaving the HID out for now. > Great! Thanks everyone for testing and reviewing. Andrew > Thanks. > > -- > Dmitry > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-input" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-16 13:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rdihj-8te-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1356108 |
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 06:11:38PM +0100, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: >> I'd like to see the series in 4.6, and we are getting closer of the >> merge window. Could we get some of your time on this? > > I adjusted the binding on patch 5 (to read -x-mm and y-mm) and applied > the first 9 leaving the HID out for now. Thanks to everyone involved that we finally got this in upstream shape after all these years! Yours, Linus Walleij
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web