Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1355439 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-10 23:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-11 00:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] intel_pstate: Do not skip samples partially "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-03-10 23:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH] intel_pstate: Do not skip samples partially Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> - 2016-03-11 00:00 +0100
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 23:50 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH] intel_pstate: Do not skip samples partially |
| Message-ID | <rbhz4-59y-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
If the current value of MPERF or the current value of TSC is the
same as the previous one, respectively, intel_pstate_sample() bails
out early and skips the sample.
However, intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate() is still called in that
case which is not correct, so modify intel_pstate_sample() to
return a bool value indicating whether or not the sample has been
taken and use it to decide whether or not to call
intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate().
While at it, remove redundant parentheses from the MPERF/TSC
check in intel_pstate_sample().
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
On top of my linux-next branch.
---
drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_calc_bus
sample->core_pct_busy = (int32_t)core_pct;
}
-static inline void intel_pstate_sample(struct cpudata *cpu, u64 time)
+static inline bool intel_pstate_sample(struct cpudata *cpu, u64 time)
{
u64 aperf, mperf;
unsigned long flags;
@@ -900,9 +900,9 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_sample(s
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf);
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf);
tsc = rdtsc();
- if ((cpu->prev_mperf == mperf) || (cpu->prev_tsc == tsc)) {
+ if (cpu->prev_mperf == mperf || cpu->prev_tsc == tsc) {
local_irq_restore(flags);
- return;
+ return false;
}
local_irq_restore(flags);
@@ -920,6 +920,7 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_sample(s
cpu->prev_aperf = aperf;
cpu->prev_mperf = mperf;
cpu->prev_tsc = tsc;
+ return true;
}
static inline int32_t get_target_pstate_use_cpu_load(struct cpudata *cpu)
@@ -1026,8 +1027,9 @@ static void intel_pstate_update_util(str
u64 delta_ns = time - cpu->sample.time;
if ((s64)delta_ns >= pid_params.sample_rate_ns) {
- intel_pstate_sample(cpu, time);
- if (!hwp_active)
+ bool sample_taken = intel_pstate_sample(cpu, time);
+
+ if (sample_taken && !hwp_active)
intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(cpu);
}
}
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-11 00:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rbhIK-5dA-15@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1355439 |
On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 23:45 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> If the current value of MPERF or the current value of TSC is the
> same as the previous one, respectively, intel_pstate_sample() bails
> out early and skips the sample.
>
> However, intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate() is still called in that
> case which is not correct, so modify intel_pstate_sample() to
> return a bool value indicating whether or not the sample has been
> taken and use it to decide whether or not to call
> intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate().
>
> While at it, remove redundant parentheses from the MPERF/TSC
> check in intel_pstate_sample().
>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> On top of my linux-next branch.
>
> ---
> drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c | 12 +++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/cpufreq/intel_pstate.c
> @@ -890,7 +890,7 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_calc_bus
> sample->core_pct_busy = (int32_t)core_pct;
> }
>
> -static inline void intel_pstate_sample(struct cpudata *cpu, u64
> time)
> +static inline bool intel_pstate_sample(struct cpudata *cpu, u64
> time)
> {
> u64 aperf, mperf;
> unsigned long flags;
> @@ -900,9 +900,9 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_sample(s
> rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf);
> rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf);
> tsc = rdtsc();
> - if ((cpu->prev_mperf == mperf) || (cpu->prev_tsc == tsc)) {
> + if (cpu->prev_mperf == mperf || cpu->prev_tsc == tsc) {
> local_irq_restore(flags);
> - return;
> + return false;
> }
> local_irq_restore(flags);
>
> @@ -920,6 +920,7 @@ static inline void intel_pstate_sample(s
> cpu->prev_aperf = aperf;
> cpu->prev_mperf = mperf;
> cpu->prev_tsc = tsc;
> + return true;
> }
>
> static inline int32_t get_target_pstate_use_cpu_load(struct cpudata
> *cpu)
> @@ -1026,8 +1027,9 @@ static void intel_pstate_update_util(str
> u64 delta_ns = time - cpu->sample.time;
>
> if ((s64)delta_ns >= pid_params.sample_rate_ns) {
> - intel_pstate_sample(cpu, time);
> - if (!hwp_active)
> + bool sample_taken = intel_pstate_sample(cpu, time);
> +
> + if (sample_taken && !hwp_active)
> intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate(cpu);
> }
> }
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web