Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1355000 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/powernv: Cpuidle related cleanup

Started byShreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
First post2016-03-10 11:50 +0100
Last post2016-03-11 02:10 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/powernv: Cpuidle related cleanup Shreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-03-10 11:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/powernv: Cpuidle related cleanup Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-03-11 02:10 +0100

#1355000 — Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/powernv: Cpuidle related cleanup

FromShreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date2016-03-10 11:50 +0100
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/powernv: Cpuidle related cleanup
Message-ID<rb6ki-5OL-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi,
Any thoughts on this?


On 02/29/2016 05:52 PM, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
> These patches are purely code movement and cleanup.
> There is no functionality change.
> 
> Note, there are multiple style error reported for patch 1 and 2.
> I think this is because checkpatch script mistakes the patches
> as C code because of the presence of semi-colon in each line. I
> for now have largely ignored these errors.
> 
> Shreyas B. Prabhu (3):
>   powerpc/powernv: Move CHECK_HMI_INTERRUPT to exception-64s header
>   powerpc/powernv: Encapsulate idle preparation steps in a macro
>   powerpc/powernv: make hypervisor state restore a function
> 
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpuidle.h       |  68 ++++++++++++++
>  arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h |  19 ++++
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S     |  29 +-----
>  arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_power7.S        | 148 ++++++++-----------------------
>  4 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-)
> 

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1355522

FromMichael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Date2016-03-11 02:10 +0100
Message-ID<rbjKx-6Q4-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1355000
On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 16:15 +0530, Shreyas B Prabhu wrote:

> Hi,
> Any thoughts on this?

Haven't had time to give it a proper review yet.

Will try and get to it.

cheers

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web