Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1355000 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Shreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-10 11:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-11 02:10 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/powernv: Cpuidle related cleanup Shreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com> - 2016-03-10 11:50 +0100
Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/powernv: Cpuidle related cleanup Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> - 2016-03-11 02:10 +0100
| From | Shreyas B Prabhu <shreyas@linux.vnet.ibm.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 11:50 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] powerpc/powernv: Cpuidle related cleanup |
| Message-ID | <rb6ki-5OL-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi, Any thoughts on this? On 02/29/2016 05:52 PM, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote: > These patches are purely code movement and cleanup. > There is no functionality change. > > Note, there are multiple style error reported for patch 1 and 2. > I think this is because checkpatch script mistakes the patches > as C code because of the presence of semi-colon in each line. I > for now have largely ignored these errors. > > Shreyas B. Prabhu (3): > powerpc/powernv: Move CHECK_HMI_INTERRUPT to exception-64s header > powerpc/powernv: Encapsulate idle preparation steps in a macro > powerpc/powernv: make hypervisor state restore a function > > arch/powerpc/include/asm/cpuidle.h | 68 ++++++++++++++ > arch/powerpc/include/asm/exception-64s.h | 19 ++++ > arch/powerpc/kernel/exceptions-64s.S | 29 +----- > arch/powerpc/kernel/idle_power7.S | 148 ++++++++----------------------- > 4 files changed, 129 insertions(+), 135 deletions(-) >
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-11 02:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rbjKx-6Q4-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1355000 |
On Thu, 2016-03-10 at 16:15 +0530, Shreyas B Prabhu wrote: > Hi, > Any thoughts on this? Haven't had time to give it a proper review yet. Will try and get to it. cheers
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web