Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1354687 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-10 00:50 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-10 10:20 +0100 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the ext4 tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-03-10 00:50 +0100
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the ext4 tree Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-03-10 10:20 +0100
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 00:50 +0100 |
| Subject | linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the ext4 tree |
| Message-ID | <raW1D-716-77@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in:
fs/ext4/inode.c
between commit:
109811c20fb8 ("ext4: simplify io_end handling for AIO DIO")
from the ext4 tree and commit:
74c66bcb7eda ("ext4: Fix data exposure after failed AIO DIO")
from the xfs tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc fs/ext4/inode.c
index 719accce152a,2b98171a9432..000000000000
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@@ -3285,10 -3161,10 +3285,10 @@@ out
}
#endif
- static void ext4_end_io_dio(struct kiocb *iocb, loff_t offset,
+ static int ext4_end_io_dio(struct kiocb *iocb, loff_t offset,
ssize_t size, void *private)
{
- ext4_io_end_t *io_end = iocb->private;
+ ext4_io_end_t *io_end = private;
/* if not async direct IO just return */
if (!io_end)
@@@ -3296,8 -3172,18 +3296,16 @@@
ext_debug("ext4_end_io_dio(): io_end 0x%p "
"for inode %lu, iocb 0x%p, offset %llu, size %zd\n",
- iocb->private, io_end->inode->i_ino, iocb, offset,
- size);
+ io_end, io_end->inode->i_ino, iocb, offset, size);
- iocb->private = NULL;
+ /*
+ * Error during AIO DIO. We cannot convert unwritten extents as the
+ * data was not written. Just clear the unwritten flag and drop io_end.
+ */
+ if (size <= 0) {
+ ext4_clear_io_unwritten_flag(io_end);
+ size = 0;
+ }
io_end->offset = offset;
io_end->size = size;
ext4_put_io_end(io_end);
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-10 10:20 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <rb4Vc-4Jq-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1354687 |
On Thu 10-03-16 10:40:56, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in:
>
> fs/ext4/inode.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 109811c20fb8 ("ext4: simplify io_end handling for AIO DIO")
>
> from the ext4 tree and commit:
>
> 74c66bcb7eda ("ext4: Fix data exposure after failed AIO DIO")
>
> from the xfs tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).
Thanks. The merge looks correct.
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web