Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1353473 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-09 00:10 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-09 22:00 +0100 |
| Articles | 5 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH v3] HID: i2c-hid: Fix suspend/resume when already runtime suspended Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> - 2016-03-09 00:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] HID: i2c-hid: Fix suspend/resume when already runtime suspended Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org> - 2016-03-09 00:20 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] HID: i2c-hid: Fix suspend/resume when already runtime suspended Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> - 2016-03-09 13:10 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] HID: i2c-hid: Fix suspend/resume when already runtime suspended Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> - 2016-03-09 21:00 +0100
Re: [PATCH v3] HID: i2c-hid: Fix suspend/resume when already runtime suspended Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> - 2016-03-09 22:00 +0100
| From | Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 00:10 +0100 |
| Subject | [PATCH v3] HID: i2c-hid: Fix suspend/resume when already runtime suspended |
| Message-ID | <rayVk-7EC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On ACPI-based systems ACPI power domain code runtime resumes device before
calling suspend method, which ensures that i2c-hid suspend code starts with
device not in low-power state and with interrupts enabled.
On other systems, especially if device is not a part of any power domain,
we may end up calling driver's system-level suspend routine while the
device is runtime-suspended (with controller in presumably low power state
and interrupts disabled). This will result in interrupts being essentially
disabled twice, and we will only re-enable them after both system resume
and runtime resume methods complete. Unfortunately i2c_hid_resume() calls
i2c_hid_hwreset() and that only works properly if interrupts are enabled.
Also if device is runtime-suspended driver's suspend code may fail if it
tries to issue I/O requests.
Let's fix it by runtime-resuming the device if we need to run HID driver's
suspend code and also disabling interrupts only if device is not already
runtime-suspended. Also on resume we mark the device as running at full
power (since that is what resetting will do to it).
Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org>
---
This is an uprev of a patch that Doug sent a year ago (see
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5970731/), adjusted to the latest
mainline. The change from v2 is that we runtime-resume the device before
calling into HID driver's suspend callback.
drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
index b921693..1f62751 100644
--- a/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
+++ b/drivers/hid/i2c-hid/i2c-hid.c
@@ -1108,13 +1108,30 @@ static int i2c_hid_suspend(struct device *dev)
struct i2c_client *client = to_i2c_client(dev);
struct i2c_hid *ihid = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
struct hid_device *hid = ihid->hid;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
int wake_status;
- if (hid->driver && hid->driver->suspend)
+ if (hid->driver && hid->driver->suspend) {
+ /*
+ * Wake up the device so that IO issues in
+ * HID driver's suspend code can succeed.
+ */
+ ret = pm_runtime_resume(dev);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
ret = hid->driver->suspend(hid, PMSG_SUSPEND);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+ }
+
+ if (!pm_runtime_suspended(dev)) {
+ /* Save some power */
+ i2c_hid_set_power(client, I2C_HID_PWR_SLEEP);
+
+ disable_irq(ihid->irq);
+ }
- disable_irq(ihid->irq);
if (device_may_wakeup(&client->dev)) {
wake_status = enable_irq_wake(ihid->irq);
if (!wake_status)
@@ -1124,10 +1141,7 @@ static int i2c_hid_suspend(struct device *dev)
wake_status);
}
- /* Save some power */
- i2c_hid_set_power(client, I2C_HID_PWR_SLEEP);
-
- return ret;
+ return 0;
}
static int i2c_hid_resume(struct device *dev)
@@ -1138,11 +1152,6 @@ static int i2c_hid_resume(struct device *dev)
struct hid_device *hid = ihid->hid;
int wake_status;
- enable_irq(ihid->irq);
- ret = i2c_hid_hwreset(client);
- if (ret)
- return ret;
-
if (device_may_wakeup(&client->dev) && ihid->irq_wake_enabled) {
wake_status = disable_irq_wake(ihid->irq);
if (!wake_status)
@@ -1152,6 +1161,16 @@ static int i2c_hid_resume(struct device *dev)
wake_status);
}
+ /* We'll resume to full power */
+ pm_runtime_disable(dev);
+ pm_runtime_set_active(dev);
+ pm_runtime_enable(dev);
+
+ enable_irq(ihid->irq);
+ ret = i2c_hid_hwreset(client);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
if (hid->driver && hid->driver->reset_resume) {
ret = hid->driver->reset_resume(hid);
return ret;
--
2.7.0.rc3.207.g0ac5344
--
Dmitry
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 00:20 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v3] HID: i2c-hid: Fix suspend/resume when already runtime suspended |
| Message-ID | <raz50-7IS-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1353473 |
On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 3:03 PM, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> wrote: > On ACPI-based systems ACPI power domain code runtime resumes device before > calling suspend method, which ensures that i2c-hid suspend code starts with > device not in low-power state and with interrupts enabled. > > On other systems, especially if device is not a part of any power domain, > we may end up calling driver's system-level suspend routine while the > device is runtime-suspended (with controller in presumably low power state > and interrupts disabled). This will result in interrupts being essentially > disabled twice, and we will only re-enable them after both system resume > and runtime resume methods complete. Unfortunately i2c_hid_resume() calls > i2c_hid_hwreset() and that only works properly if interrupts are enabled. > > Also if device is runtime-suspended driver's suspend code may fail if it > tries to issue I/O requests. > > Let's fix it by runtime-resuming the device if we need to run HID driver's > suspend code and also disabling interrupts only if device is not already > runtime-suspended. Also on resume we mark the device as running at full > power (since that is what resetting will do to it). > > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org> > --- > > This is an uprev of a patch that Doug sent a year ago (see > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/5970731/), adjusted to the latest > mainline. The change from v2 is that we runtime-resume the device before > calling into HID driver's suspend callback. -- Benson Leung Senior Software Engineer, Chrom* OS bleung@chromium.org
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 13:10 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <raL6a-7IU-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1353473 |
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:03:23PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On ACPI-based systems ACPI power domain code runtime resumes device before > calling suspend method, which ensures that i2c-hid suspend code starts with > device not in low-power state and with interrupts enabled. > > On other systems, especially if device is not a part of any power domain, > we may end up calling driver's system-level suspend routine while the > device is runtime-suspended (with controller in presumably low power state > and interrupts disabled). This will result in interrupts being essentially > disabled twice, and we will only re-enable them after both system resume > and runtime resume methods complete. Unfortunately i2c_hid_resume() calls > i2c_hid_hwreset() and that only works properly if interrupts are enabled. > > Also if device is runtime-suspended driver's suspend code may fail if it > tries to issue I/O requests. > > Let's fix it by runtime-resuming the device if we need to run HID driver's > suspend code and also disabling interrupts only if device is not already > runtime-suspended. Also on resume we mark the device as running at full > power (since that is what resetting will do to it). > > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org> Tested on a couple of Intel Skylake and Baytrail based systems and power management of I2C connected HID devices still seems to work just fine. Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 21:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <raSr0-4bO-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1354061 |
On Mar 09 2016 or thereabouts, Mika Westerberg wrote: > On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:03:23PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > On ACPI-based systems ACPI power domain code runtime resumes device before > > calling suspend method, which ensures that i2c-hid suspend code starts with > > device not in low-power state and with interrupts enabled. > > > > On other systems, especially if device is not a part of any power domain, > > we may end up calling driver's system-level suspend routine while the > > device is runtime-suspended (with controller in presumably low power state > > and interrupts disabled). This will result in interrupts being essentially > > disabled twice, and we will only re-enable them after both system resume > > and runtime resume methods complete. Unfortunately i2c_hid_resume() calls > > i2c_hid_hwreset() and that only works properly if interrupts are enabled. > > > > Also if device is runtime-suspended driver's suspend code may fail if it > > tries to issue I/O requests. > > > > Let's fix it by runtime-resuming the device if we need to run HID driver's > > suspend code and also disabling interrupts only if device is not already > > runtime-suspended. Also on resume we mark the device as running at full > > power (since that is what resetting will do to it). > > > > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org> > > Tested on a couple of Intel Skylake and Baytrail based systems and power > management of I2C connected HID devices still seems to work just fine. > > Tested-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com> Well, I have completely no way of testing this myself, and I blindly trust Mika, Dmitry and the others for doing the right thing :). Acked-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> Cheers, Benjamin
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-09 22:00 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <raTn4-4Os-11@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1354402 |
On Tue, 8 Mar 2016, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On ACPI-based systems ACPI power domain code runtime resumes device before > calling suspend method, which ensures that i2c-hid suspend code starts with > device not in low-power state and with interrupts enabled. > > On other systems, especially if device is not a part of any power domain, > we may end up calling driver's system-level suspend routine while the > device is runtime-suspended (with controller in presumably low power state > and interrupts disabled). This will result in interrupts being essentially > disabled twice, and we will only re-enable them after both system resume > and runtime resume methods complete. Unfortunately i2c_hid_resume() calls > i2c_hid_hwreset() and that only works properly if interrupts are enabled. > > Also if device is runtime-suspended driver's suspend code may fail if it > tries to issue I/O requests. > > Let's fix it by runtime-resuming the device if we need to run HID driver's > suspend code and also disabling interrupts only if device is not already > runtime-suspended. Also on resume we mark the device as running at full > power (since that is what resetting will do to it). > > Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@chromium.org> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@chromium.org> Applied to for-4.6/i2c-hid, thanks. On Wed, 9 Mar 2016, Benjamin Tissoires wrote: > Well, I have completely no way of testing this myself, and I blindly > trust Mika, Dmitry and the others for doing the right thing :). Welcome to the wonderful world of linux kernel maintainers! :p Thanks, -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web