Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1352852 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Lino Sanfilippo <lsanfil@marvell.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-03-08 11:40 +0100 |
| Last post | 2016-03-08 11:40 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
Question concerning function illegal_highdma Lino Sanfilippo <lsanfil@marvell.com> - 2016-03-08 11:40 +0100
| From | Lino Sanfilippo <lsanfil@marvell.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-03-08 11:40 +0100 |
| Subject | Question concerning function illegal_highdma |
| Message-ID | <randw-84x-37@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi all, while trying to understand the meaning of the net_device flag NETIF_F_HIGHDMA I came across the function illegal_highdma() which seems to perform two tasks: 1. Check if a network interface is able to handle high memory pages 2. Check if a network interface is able to handle the resulting DMA addresses What I dont understand is why both conditions are only checked if CONFIG_HIGHMEM is set. For 1. this makes sense, of course. But why is 2. also only checked with CONFIG_HIGHMEM? Should not 2. always be checked, regardless of whether high memory exists in the system or not? Thanks for any enlightenment in advance! Regards, Lino
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web