Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1354668 > unrolled thread

linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the ext4 tree

Started byStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
First post2016-03-10 00:50 +0100
Last post2016-03-10 10:20 +0100
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the ext4 tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-03-10 00:50 +0100
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the ext4 tree Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> - 2016-03-10 10:20 +0100

#1354668 — linux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the ext4 tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2016-03-10 00:50 +0100
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the xfs tree with the ext4 tree
Message-ID<raW1B-716-41@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in:

  fs/ext4/ext4.h

between commit:

  109811c20fb8 ("ext4: simplify io_end handling for AIO DIO")

from the ext4 tree and commit:

  74c66bcb7eda ("ext4: Fix data exposure after failed AIO DIO")

from the xfs tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
is required).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc fs/ext4/ext4.h
index 70b8e0409566,56c12df107ab..000000000000
--- a/fs/ext4/ext4.h
+++ b/fs/ext4/ext4.h
@@@ -1499,15 -1504,16 +1499,6 @@@ static inline int ext4_valid_inum(struc
  		 ino <= le32_to_cpu(EXT4_SB(sb)->s_es->s_inodes_count));
  }
  
- static inline void ext4_set_io_unwritten_flag(struct inode *inode,
- 					      struct ext4_io_end *io_end)
 -static inline ext4_io_end_t *ext4_inode_aio(struct inode *inode)
--{
- 	if (!(io_end->flag & EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN)) {
- 		io_end->flag |= EXT4_IO_END_UNWRITTEN;
- 		atomic_inc(&EXT4_I(inode)->i_unwritten);
- 	}
 -	return inode->i_private;
 -}
 -
 -static inline void ext4_inode_aio_set(struct inode *inode, ext4_io_end_t *io)
 -{
 -	inode->i_private = io;
--}
--
  /*
   * Inode dynamic state flags
   */

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1354939

FromJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Date2016-03-10 10:20 +0100
Message-ID<rb4Vc-4Jq-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1354668
On Thu 10-03-16 10:41:00, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the xfs tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   fs/ext4/ext4.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   109811c20fb8 ("ext4: simplify io_end handling for AIO DIO")
> 
> from the ext4 tree and commit:
> 
>   74c66bcb7eda ("ext4: Fix data exposure after failed AIO DIO")
> 
> from the xfs tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).

Thanks! This merge looks correct as well.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>
SUSE Labs, CR

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web