Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1351913 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 03/15] perf session: Simplify tool stubs

Started byArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
First post2016-03-07 20:50 +0100
Last post2016-03-08 10:20 +0100
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 03/15] perf session: Simplify tool stubs Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org> - 2016-03-07 20:50 +0100
    Re: [PATCH 03/15] perf session: Simplify tool stubs Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> - 2016-03-08 08:50 +0100
      Re: [PATCH 03/15] perf session: Simplify tool stubs Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-03-08 10:20 +0100

#1351913 — [PATCH 03/15] perf session: Simplify tool stubs

FromArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Date2016-03-07 20:50 +0100
Subject[PATCH 03/15] perf session: Simplify tool stubs
Message-ID<ra9ke-7bJ-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Adrian Hunter <ajhunter@gmail.com>

Some of the stubs are identical so just have one function for them.

Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ajhunter@gmail.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1457005856-6143-3-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
 tools/perf/util/session.c | 40 +++++++---------------------------------
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/util/session.c b/tools/perf/util/session.c
index 40b7a0d0905b..60b3593d210d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/session.c
+++ b/tools/perf/util/session.c
@@ -240,14 +240,6 @@ static int process_event_stub(struct perf_tool *tool __maybe_unused,
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int process_build_id_stub(struct perf_tool *tool __maybe_unused,
-				 union perf_event *event __maybe_unused,
-				 struct perf_session *session __maybe_unused)
-{
-	dump_printf(": unhandled!\n");
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int process_finished_round_stub(struct perf_tool *tool __maybe_unused,
 				       union perf_event *event __maybe_unused,
 				       struct ordered_events *oe __maybe_unused)
@@ -260,23 +252,6 @@ static int process_finished_round(struct perf_tool *tool,
 				  union perf_event *event,
 				  struct ordered_events *oe);
 
-static int process_id_index_stub(struct perf_tool *tool __maybe_unused,
-				 union perf_event *event __maybe_unused,
-				 struct perf_session *perf_session
-				 __maybe_unused)
-{
-	dump_printf(": unhandled!\n");
-	return 0;
-}
-
-static int process_event_auxtrace_info_stub(struct perf_tool *tool __maybe_unused,
-				union perf_event *event __maybe_unused,
-				struct perf_session *session __maybe_unused)
-{
-	dump_printf(": unhandled!\n");
-	return 0;
-}
-
 static int skipn(int fd, off_t n)
 {
 	char buf[4096];
@@ -303,10 +278,9 @@ static s64 process_event_auxtrace_stub(struct perf_tool *tool __maybe_unused,
 	return event->auxtrace.size;
 }
 
-static
-int process_event_auxtrace_error_stub(struct perf_tool *tool __maybe_unused,
-				      union perf_event *event __maybe_unused,
-				      struct perf_session *session __maybe_unused)
+static int process_event_op2_stub(struct perf_tool *tool __maybe_unused,
+				  union perf_event *event __maybe_unused,
+				  struct perf_session *session __maybe_unused)
 {
 	dump_printf(": unhandled!\n");
 	return 0;
@@ -410,7 +384,7 @@ void perf_tool__fill_defaults(struct perf_tool *tool)
 	if (tool->tracing_data == NULL)
 		tool->tracing_data = process_event_synth_tracing_data_stub;
 	if (tool->build_id == NULL)
-		tool->build_id = process_build_id_stub;
+		tool->build_id = process_event_op2_stub;
 	if (tool->finished_round == NULL) {
 		if (tool->ordered_events)
 			tool->finished_round = process_finished_round;
@@ -418,13 +392,13 @@ void perf_tool__fill_defaults(struct perf_tool *tool)
 			tool->finished_round = process_finished_round_stub;
 	}
 	if (tool->id_index == NULL)
-		tool->id_index = process_id_index_stub;
+		tool->id_index = process_event_op2_stub;
 	if (tool->auxtrace_info == NULL)
-		tool->auxtrace_info = process_event_auxtrace_info_stub;
+		tool->auxtrace_info = process_event_op2_stub;
 	if (tool->auxtrace == NULL)
 		tool->auxtrace = process_event_auxtrace_stub;
 	if (tool->auxtrace_error == NULL)
-		tool->auxtrace_error = process_event_auxtrace_error_stub;
+		tool->auxtrace_error = process_event_op2_stub;
 	if (tool->thread_map == NULL)
 		tool->thread_map = process_event_thread_map_stub;
 	if (tool->cpu_map == NULL)
-- 
2.5.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1352692

FromAdrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Date2016-03-08 08:50 +0100
Message-ID<rakz0-6iA-15@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1351913
On 07/03/16 21:44, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> From: Adrian Hunter <ajhunter@gmail.com>

Very sorry, but I just noticed that this and patch 5 (perf jit: Move clockid
validation) have the wrong email address for the "From" and "Signed-off-by".
 It should be adrian.hunter@intel.com.  Please consider changing it or
dropping these patches for now.

> 
> Some of the stubs are identical so just have one function for them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Hunter <ajhunter@gmail.com>
> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>
> Cc: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1457005856-6143-3-git-send-email-adrian.hunter@intel.com
> Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1352780

FromIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Date2016-03-08 10:20 +0100
Message-ID<ralY7-7kI-21@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1352692
* Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com> wrote:

> On 07/03/16 21:44, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > From: Adrian Hunter <ajhunter@gmail.com>
> 
> Very sorry, but I just noticed that this and patch 5 (perf jit: Move clockid
> validation) have the wrong email address for the "From" and "Signed-off-by".
>  It should be adrian.hunter@intel.com.  Please consider changing it or
> dropping these patches for now.

Ok, I've changed these two patches and have applied the whole series from email. 
(we are getting close to the merge window)

Thanks,

	Ingo

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web