Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1451863 > unrolled thread

Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] regulator: axp20x: support AXP813 variant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] regulator: axp20x: support AXP813 variant Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@gmail.com> - 2016-07-28 12:30 +0200
    Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] regulator: axp20x: support AXP813 variant Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> - 2016-07-28 22:30 +0200

#1451863 — Re: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH] regulator: axp20x: support AXP813 variant

Hi All,

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr> wrote:
> The X-Powers AXP813 PMIC is close enough to the AXP809 with some
> more outputs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
> ---
>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/axp20x.txt | 32 ++++++++-
>  drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c                         |  1 +
>  drivers/mfd/axp20x.c                             |  3 +
>  drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c             | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h                       | 38 +++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> index 6d9ac76..c3287c9 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> @@ -467,7 +543,8 @@ static int axp20x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                  * name.
>                  */
>                 if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DC1SW) ||
> -                   (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC1SW)) {
> +                   (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC1SW) ||
> +                   (regulators == axp813_regulators && i == AXP813_DC1SW)) {

Are we getting to the point now where we need some other way to flag
these? Maybe a set of flags per regulator?

>                         new_desc = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*desc),
>                                                 GFP_KERNEL);
>                         *new_desc = regulators[i];
> @@ -505,7 +582,8 @@ static int axp20x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>                  * Save AXP22X DCDC1 / DCDC5 regulator names for later.
>                  */
>                 if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DCDC1) ||
> -                   (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DCDC1))
> +                   (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DCDC1) ||
> +                   (regulators == axp813_regulators && i == AXP813_DCDC1))

Ditto.

>                         of_property_read_string(rdev->dev.of_node,
>                                                 "regulator-name",
>                                                 &dcdc1_name);

Thanks,

-- 
Julian Calaby

Email: julian.calaby@gmail.com
Profile: http://www.google.com/profiles/julian.calaby/

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1452095

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 08:24:41PM +1000, Julian Calaby wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr> wrote:
> > The X-Powers AXP813 PMIC is close enough to the AXP809 with some
> > more outputs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jean-Francois Moine <moinejf@free.fr>
> > ---
> >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/axp20x.txt | 32 ++++++++-
> >  drivers/mfd/axp20x-rsb.c                         |  1 +
> >  drivers/mfd/axp20x.c                             |  3 +
> >  drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c             | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++-
> >  include/linux/mfd/axp20x.h                       | 38 +++++++++++
> >  5 files changed, 153 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> > index 6d9ac76..c3287c9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> > +++ b/drivers/regulator/axp20x-regulator.c
> > @@ -467,7 +543,8 @@ static int axp20x_regulator_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >                  * name.
> >                  */
> >                 if ((regulators == axp22x_regulators && i == AXP22X_DC1SW) ||
> > -                   (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC1SW)) {
> > +                   (regulators == axp809_regulators && i == AXP809_DC1SW) ||
> > +                   (regulators == axp813_regulators && i == AXP813_DC1SW)) {
> 
> Are we getting to the point now where we need some other way to flag
> these? Maybe a set of flags per regulator?

I'd be inclined to say yes. We can also associate a structure to the
compatible, and store a bunch of infos there (like does it have a
DC1SW regulator in this case).

Maxime

-- 
Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web