Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1451735 > unrolled thread
| Started by | joeyli <jlee@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-28 08:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-28 23:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH] efi: capsule: allocate whole capsule into virtual memory joeyli <jlee@suse.com> - 2016-07-28 08:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH] efi: capsule: allocate whole capsule into virtual memory "Christ, Austin" <austinwc@codeaurora.org> - 2016-07-28 23:30 +0200
| From | joeyli <jlee@suse.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-28 08:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH] efi: capsule: allocate whole capsule into virtual memory |
| Message-ID | <rZMG5-2cb-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi Austin,
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:41:31AM -0600, Austin Christ wrote:
> According to UEFI 2.6 section 7.5.3, the capsule should be in contiguous
> virtual memory and firmware may consume the capsule immediately. To
> correctly implement this functionality, the kernel driver needs to vmap
> the entire capsule at the time it is made available to firmware.
>
> The virtual allocation of the capsule update has been changed from kmap,
> which was only allocating the first page of the update, to vmap and
> allocates the entire data payload.
>
> Signed-off-by: Austin Christ <austinwc@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c
> index c99c24b..c4f3c20 100644
> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c
> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c
> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> #include <linux/mutex.h>
> #include <linux/efi.h>
> +#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>
> #define NO_FURTHER_WRITE_ACTION -1
>
> @@ -108,14 +109,15 @@ static ssize_t efi_capsule_submit_update(struct capsule_info *cap_info)
> int ret;
> void *cap_hdr_temp;
>
> - cap_hdr_temp = kmap(cap_info->pages[0]);
> + cap_hdr_temp = vmap(cap_info->pages, cap_info->index,
> + VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
> if (!cap_hdr_temp) {
> pr_debug("%s: kmap() failed\n", __func__);
^^^^^^^^ use vmap()?
I have only a minor suggestion as above.
Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
> return -EFAULT;
> }
>
> ret = efi_capsule_update(cap_hdr_temp, cap_info->pages);
> - kunmap(cap_info->pages[0]);
> + vunmap(cap_hdr_temp);
> if (ret) {
> pr_err("%s: efi_capsule_update() failed\n", __func__);
> return ret;
> --
Thanks a lot!
Joey Lee
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Christ, Austin" <austinwc@codeaurora.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-28 23:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <s012q-3rN-41@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1451735 |
Hello,
On 7/28/2016 12:07 AM, joeyli wrote:
> Hi Austin,
>
> On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 10:41:31AM -0600, Austin Christ wrote:
>> According to UEFI 2.6 section 7.5.3, the capsule should be in contiguous
>> virtual memory and firmware may consume the capsule immediately. To
>> correctly implement this functionality, the kernel driver needs to vmap
>> the entire capsule at the time it is made available to firmware.
>>
>> The virtual allocation of the capsule update has been changed from kmap,
>> which was only allocating the first page of the update, to vmap and
>> allocates the entire data payload.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Austin Christ <austinwc@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c | 6 ++++--
>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c b/drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c
>> index c99c24b..c4f3c20 100644
>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c
>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/capsule-loader.c
>> @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> #include <linux/efi.h>
>> +#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>>
>> #define NO_FURTHER_WRITE_ACTION -1
>>
>> @@ -108,14 +109,15 @@ static ssize_t efi_capsule_submit_update(struct capsule_info *cap_info)
>> int ret;
>> void *cap_hdr_temp;
>>
>> - cap_hdr_temp = kmap(cap_info->pages[0]);
>> + cap_hdr_temp = vmap(cap_info->pages, cap_info->index,
>> + VM_MAP, PAGE_KERNEL);
>> if (!cap_hdr_temp) {
>> pr_debug("%s: kmap() failed\n", __func__);
> ^^^^^^^^ use vmap()?
>
> I have only a minor suggestion as above.
>
> Reviewed-by: Lee, Chun-Yi <jlee@suse.com>
Thanks, this will be fixed in v2.
>
>> return -EFAULT;
>> }
>>
>> ret = efi_capsule_update(cap_hdr_temp, cap_info->pages);
>> - kunmap(cap_info->pages[0]);
>> + vunmap(cap_hdr_temp);
>> if (ret) {
>> pr_err("%s: efi_capsule_update() failed\n", __func__);
>> return ret;
>> --
> Thanks a lot!
> Joey Lee
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-efi" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web