Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1450163 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 4.6 049/203] nfsd: Extend the mutex holding region around in nfsd4_process_open2()

Started byGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
First post2016-07-26 00:30 +0200
Last post2016-07-26 00:30 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 4.6 049/203] nfsd: Extend the mutex holding region around in nfsd4_process_open2() Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-07-26 00:30 +0200

#1450163 — [PATCH 4.6 049/203] nfsd: Extend the mutex holding region around in nfsd4_process_open2()

FromGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Date2016-07-26 00:30 +0200
Subject[PATCH 4.6 049/203] nfsd: Extend the mutex holding region around in nfsd4_process_open2()
Message-ID<rYWxS-25U-101@gated-at.bofh.it>
4.6-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>

commit 5cc1fb2a093e254b656c64ff24b0b76bed1d34d9 upstream.

To avoid racing entry into nfs4_get_vfs_file().
Make init_open_stateid() return with locked stateid to be unlocked
by the caller.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c |   16 +++++++++++++---
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4state.c
@@ -3487,6 +3487,10 @@ init_open_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid
 	struct nfs4_openowner *oo = open->op_openowner;
 	struct nfs4_ol_stateid *retstp = NULL;
 
+	/* We are moving these outside of the spinlocks to avoid the warnings */
+	mutex_init(&stp->st_mutex);
+	mutex_lock(&stp->st_mutex);
+
 	spin_lock(&oo->oo_owner.so_client->cl_lock);
 	spin_lock(&fp->fi_lock);
 
@@ -3502,13 +3506,17 @@ init_open_stateid(struct nfs4_ol_stateid
 	stp->st_access_bmap = 0;
 	stp->st_deny_bmap = 0;
 	stp->st_openstp = NULL;
-	mutex_init(&stp->st_mutex);
 	list_add(&stp->st_perstateowner, &oo->oo_owner.so_stateids);
 	list_add(&stp->st_perfile, &fp->fi_stateids);
 
 out_unlock:
 	spin_unlock(&fp->fi_lock);
 	spin_unlock(&oo->oo_owner.so_client->cl_lock);
+	if (retstp) {
+		mutex_lock(&retstp->st_mutex);
+		/* Not that we need to, just for neatness */
+		mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);
+	}
 	return retstp;
 }
 
@@ -4344,11 +4352,14 @@ nfsd4_process_open2(struct svc_rqst *rqs
 	} else {
 		stp = open->op_stp;
 		open->op_stp = NULL;
+		/*
+		 * init_open_stateid() either returns a locked stateid
+		 * it found, or initializes and locks the new one we passed in
+		 */
 		swapstp = init_open_stateid(stp, fp, open);
 		if (swapstp) {
 			nfs4_put_stid(&stp->st_stid);
 			stp = swapstp;
-			mutex_lock(&stp->st_mutex);
 			status = nfs4_upgrade_open(rqstp, fp, current_fh,
 						stp, open);
 			if (status) {
@@ -4357,7 +4368,6 @@ nfsd4_process_open2(struct svc_rqst *rqs
 			}
 			goto upgrade_out;
 		}
-		mutex_lock(&stp->st_mutex);
 		status = nfs4_get_vfs_file(rqstp, fp, current_fh, stp, open);
 		if (status) {
 			mutex_unlock(&stp->st_mutex);

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web