Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1447874 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: sun4i: spi: Allow transfers larger than FIFO size

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: sun4i: spi: Allow transfers larger than FIFO size Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de> - 2016-07-21 15:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: sun4i: spi: Allow transfers larger than FIFO size Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-07-21 18:40 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: sun4i: spi: Allow transfers larger than FIFO size Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de> - 2016-07-21 20:10 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: sun4i: spi: Allow transfers larger than FIFO size Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-07-21 20:20 +0200
        Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: sun4i: spi: Allow transfers larger than FIFO size Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> - 2016-07-21 20:30 +0200

#1447874 — Re: [PATCH v6] ARM: sun4i: spi: Allow transfers larger than FIFO size

Hi all,

On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 09:41:51PM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:

> Alexandru sent this patch over a year and a half ago, and I believe several
> tree's have been carrying it since. We've been using this patch on an
> Olimex OLinuxIno Lime1 and Lime2 using the mmc-spi driver to access SD cards
> without problems. So bumping this and adding my

I also have a need for this addition since it makes an ENC28J60 SPI
ethernet controller work on the Cubieboard2. I've successfully tested it
with 4.6.3 where it still applies cleanly.

(There's is a very minor conflict when applying against current Linus
master (EINVAL was changed to EMSGSIZE). I can supply a rebased version
if so desired.)

What is keeping the patch from being merged (i.e. into mainline)?

Thanks!
Michael

> Tested-by: Olliver Schinagl <oliver@schinagl.nl>

Tested-by: Michael Weiser <michael.weiser@gmx.de>

> Changes from v5as warned by checkpatch. No functional changes.
>  * Added some newlines to make checkpatch happy. No functional changes.

> Changes from v4:
>  * use min3() instead of two if statements in sun4i_spi_fill_fifo()
>  * fix trivial whitespace issue in if statement in sun4i_spi_handler()
>  * use consistent style in assigning 'reg' in the added functions.

> Alexandru Gagniuc (1):
>   ARM: sun4i: spi: Allow transfers larger than FIFO size

>  drivers/spi/spi-sun4i.c | 76 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>  1 file changed, 67 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
-- 
Thanks,
Michael

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1447997

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 01:27:01PM +0200, Michael Weiser wrote:

> What is keeping the patch from being merged (i.e. into mainline)?

Someone needs to address whatever review comments there were on the last
version and submit it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1448031

Hi Mark,

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:31:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > What is keeping the patch from being merged (i.e. into mainline)?
> Someone needs to address whatever review comments there were on the last
> version and submit it.

That's my point: There don't seem to be any.

v6 was resend with fixes to checkpatch niggles on v5:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-August/363073.html

v5 addressed comments by Maxime on v4:
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-April/244305.html
http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-March/243995.html

I can't find any comments on v5 or v6.
-- 
Thanks,
Michael

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1448046

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 08:03:16PM +0200, Olliver Schinagl wrote:
> As i recall, some claimed it was needed as we have dma now, but i think this patch still scratches the same itch ...

Please don't top post, reply in line with needed context.  This allows
readers to readily follow the flow of conversation and understand what
you are talking about and also helps ensure that everything in the
discussion is being addressed.

Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something
substantially less than 80 columns.  Doing this makes your messages much
easier to read and reply to.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#1448049

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:27:12PM +0200, Michael Weiser wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:31:53PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > > What is keeping the patch from being merged (i.e. into mainline)?
> > Someone needs to address whatever review comments there were on the last
> > version and submit it.

> That's my point: There don't seem to be any.

> v6 was resend with fixes to checkpatch niggles on v5:
> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2015-August/363073.html

I can't tell if that was even submitted, it's got a subject line of
"ARM: sun4i" so there's every chance that even if it was sent to me it
got deleted unread.  Whatever was going on it needs to be submited.

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web