Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1447791 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-21 13:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-22 04:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH 4/6] irqchip: add irqchip driver for nuc900 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> - 2016-07-21 13:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 4/6] irqchip: add irqchip driver for nuc900 Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com> - 2016-07-22 04:40 +0200
| From | Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-21 13:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 4/6] irqchip: add irqchip driver for nuc900 |
| Message-ID | <rXjRU-6ms-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Saturday, July 9, 2016 11:25:19 AM CEST Wan Zongshun wrote: > On 2016年06月29日 23:27, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > On Saturday, June 25, 2016 6:37:20 PM CEST Wan Zongshun wrote: > >> +#define IRQ_WDT W90X900_IRQ(1) > >> +#define IRQ_WWDT W90X900_IRQ(2) > >> +#define IRQ_LVD W90X900_IRQ(3) > >> +#define IRQ_EXT0 W90X900_IRQ(4) > >> +#define IRQ_EXT1 W90X900_IRQ(5) > >> +#define IRQ_EXT2 W90X900_IRQ(6) > >> +#define IRQ_EXT3 W90X900_IRQ(7) > >> +#define IRQ_EXT4 W90X900_IRQ(8) > >> +#define IRQ_EXT5 W90X900_IRQ(9) > >> +#define IRQ_EXT6 W90X900_IRQ(10) > > > > I'd suggest dropping the list, the contents are now in the dts. > > Arnd, I will drop this file later, since old w90x900 plat still need it. Sure. > but I will remove the Macros related to nuc970 and avoid nuc970 > interrupt using those Macro. > > But I still need hack this irqs.h like below, since here NR_IRQS defined > and it is need for nuc970 irqchip driver. > > #if !defined(CONFIG_SOC_NUC900) > #define NR_IRQS (IRQ_ADC+1) > #else > #define NR_IRQS 62 > #endif Have you considered using CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ? That would avoid the need for setting NR_IRQS entirely, but may also require more work elsewhere. Arnd
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Wan ZongShun <mcuos.com@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-22 04:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rXyxz-81g-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1447791 |
> >> but I will remove the Macros related to nuc970 and avoid nuc970 >> interrupt using those Macro. >> >> But I still need hack this irqs.h like below, since here NR_IRQS defined >> and it is need for nuc970 irqchip driver. >> >> #if !defined(CONFIG_SOC_NUC900) >> #define NR_IRQS (IRQ_ADC+1) >> #else >> #define NR_IRQS 62 >> #endif > > Have you considered using CONFIG_SPARSE_IRQ? That would avoid the need > for setting NR_IRQS entirely, but may also require more work elsewhere. Sure, I will refer to your previous nuc900 series patches for SPARSE IRQ, now I am waiting for rc1 release, and will send v3 patches. > > Arnd -- --- Vincent Wan(Zongshun) www.mcuos.com
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web