Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1445986 > unrolled thread

[PATCH] Staging: ks7010: michael_mic: fixed macros coding style issue

Started byBing Sun <sunbing@redflag-linux.com>
First post2016-07-19 04:00 +0200
Last post2016-07-21 19:00 +0200
Articles 3 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH] Staging: ks7010: michael_mic: fixed macros coding style issue Bing Sun <sunbing@redflag-linux.com> - 2016-07-19 04:00 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] Staging: ks7010: michael_mic: fixed macros coding style  issue Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-07-20 18:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH] Staging: ks7010: michael_mic: fixed macros coding style  issue Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> - 2016-07-21 19:00 +0200

#1445986 — [PATCH] Staging: ks7010: michael_mic: fixed macros coding style issue

FromBing Sun <sunbing@redflag-linux.com>
Date2016-07-19 04:00 +0200
Subject[PATCH] Staging: ks7010: michael_mic: fixed macros coding style issue
Message-ID<rWsud-5Q5-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
Fixed coding style issue:
Enclose multiple statements macros definition in a do while loop.
Use one space around binary operators.

Signed-off-by: Bing Sun <sunbing@redflag-linux.com>
---
 drivers/staging/ks7010/michael_mic.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/michael_mic.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/michael_mic.c
index e14c109..d332678 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/michael_mic.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/michael_mic.c
@@ -20,15 +20,21 @@
 #define getUInt32( A, B ) 	(uint32_t)(A[B+0] << 0) + (A[B+1] << 8) + (A[B+2] << 16) + (A[B+3] << 24)
 
 // Convert from UInt32 to Byte[] in a portable way
-#define putUInt32( A, B, C ) 	A[B+0] = (uint8_t) (C & 0xff);		\
-				A[B+1] = (uint8_t) ((C>>8) & 0xff);	\
-				A[B+2] = (uint8_t) ((C>>16) & 0xff);	\
-				A[B+3] = (uint8_t) ((C>>24) & 0xff)
+#define putUInt32(A, B, C)					\
+do {								\
+	A[B + 0] = (uint8_t)(C & 0xff);				\
+	A[B + 1] = (uint8_t)((C >> 8) & 0xff);			\
+	A[B + 2] = (uint8_t)((C >> 16) & 0xff);			\
+	A[B + 3] = (uint8_t)((C >> 24) & 0xff);			\
+} while (0)
 
 // Reset the state to the empty message.
-#define MichaelClear( A ) 	A->L = A->K0; \
-				A->R = A->K1; \
-				A->nBytesInM = 0;
+#define MichaelClear(A)			\
+do {					\
+	A->L = A->K0;			\
+	A->R = A->K1;			\
+	A->nBytesInM = 0;		\
+} while (0)
 
 static
 void MichaelInitializeFunction(struct michel_mic_t *Mic, uint8_t * key)
-- 
2.1.0

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1447332 — Re: [PATCH] Staging: ks7010: michael_mic: fixed macros coding style issue

FromWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date2016-07-20 18:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Staging: ks7010: michael_mic: fixed macros coding style issue
Message-ID<rX2em-3Bs-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1445986

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 09:51:06AM +0800, Bing Sun wrote:
> Fixed coding style issue:
> Enclose multiple statements macros definition in a do while loop.
> Use one space around binary operators.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bing Sun <sunbing@redflag-linux.com>

Looks good for what it is. One comment below. I will test this tomorrow.

> ---
>  drivers/staging/ks7010/michael_mic.c | 20 +++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ks7010/michael_mic.c b/drivers/staging/ks7010/michael_mic.c
> index e14c109..d332678 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/ks7010/michael_mic.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/ks7010/michael_mic.c
> @@ -20,15 +20,21 @@
>  #define getUInt32( A, B ) 	(uint32_t)(A[B+0] << 0) + (A[B+1] << 8) + (A[B+2] << 16) + (A[B+3] << 24)
>  
>  // Convert from UInt32 to Byte[] in a portable way
> -#define putUInt32( A, B, C ) 	A[B+0] = (uint8_t) (C & 0xff);		\
> -				A[B+1] = (uint8_t) ((C>>8) & 0xff);	\
> -				A[B+2] = (uint8_t) ((C>>16) & 0xff);	\
> -				A[B+3] = (uint8_t) ((C>>24) & 0xff)
> +#define putUInt32(A, B, C)					\
> +do {								\
> +	A[B + 0] = (uint8_t)(C & 0xff);				\
> +	A[B + 1] = (uint8_t)((C >> 8) & 0xff);			\
> +	A[B + 2] = (uint8_t)((C >> 16) & 0xff);			\
> +	A[B + 3] = (uint8_t)((C >> 24) & 0xff);			\
> +} while (0)

We surely have helper functions for this in the kernel?

>  
>  // Reset the state to the empty message.
> -#define MichaelClear( A ) 	A->L = A->K0; \
> -				A->R = A->K1; \
> -				A->nBytesInM = 0;
> +#define MichaelClear(A)			\
> +do {					\
> +	A->L = A->K0;			\
> +	A->R = A->K1;			\
> +	A->nBytesInM = 0;		\
> +} while (0)
>  
>  static
>  void MichaelInitializeFunction(struct michel_mic_t *Mic, uint8_t * key)
> -- 
> 2.1.0
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1448017 — Re: [PATCH] Staging: ks7010: michael_mic: fixed macros coding style issue

FromWolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date2016-07-21 19:00 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Staging: ks7010: michael_mic: fixed macros coding style issue
Message-ID<rXpuj-1Dd-61@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1445986
On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 09:51:06AM +0800, Bing Sun wrote:
> Fixed coding style issue:
> Enclose multiple statements macros definition in a do while loop.
> Use one space around binary operators.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bing Sun <sunbing@redflag-linux.com>

Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web