Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1445242 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-18 08:40 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-19 02:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-07-18 08:40 +0200
Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> - 2016-07-18 14:10 +0200
Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> - 2016-07-19 02:10 +0200
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 08:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [STABLE] kernel oops which can be fixed by peterz's patches |
| Message-ID | <rWanD-2FI-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:15:55AM +0000, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 05:52:11PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> >
> > Upstream commits to be applied
> > ==============================
> >
> > e3fca9e: sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list
> > 4c9a4bc: sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed()
> > 8046d68: sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task()
> > fd7a4be: sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks
> > 0ea60c2: sched,dl: Remove return value from pull_dl_task()
> > 9916e21: sched, dl: Convert switched_{from, to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() to balance callbacks
> >
> > The reason why these should be applied
> > ======================================
> >
> > Our products developed using 3.16 kernel, faced a kernel oops which can
> > be fixed with above upstreamed patches. The oops is caused by "Unable
> > to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000000xx"
> > in the call path,
> >
> > __sched_setscheduler()
> > check_class_changed()
> > switched_to_fair()
> > check_preempt_curr()
> > check_preempt_wakeup()
> > find_matching_se()
> > is_same_group()
> >
> > by "if (se->cfs_rq == pse->cfs_rq) // se, pse == NULL" condition.
> >
> > How to apply it
> > ===============
> >
> > For stable 4.2.8+:
> > N/A (already applied)
> >
> > For longterm 4.1.15:
> > Cherry-picking the upsteam commits works with a trivial conflict.
> >
> > For longterm 3.18.25:
> > Refer to the backported patches in this thread.
> >
> > For longterm 3.14.58:
> > Refer to the backported patches in this thread. And applying
> > additional "6c3b4d4: sched: Clean up idle task SMP logic" commit
> > makes backporting the upstream commits much simpler. So my
> > backporting patches include the patch.
>
> All now applied to the 3.14-stable queue, thanks.
Hello,
I realized this was not applied to 3.18-stable yet.
Is there any reason?
Thanks,
Byungchul
>
> greg k-h
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-18 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rWfx0-5XZ-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1445242 |
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 03:31:46PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:15:55AM +0000, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 05:52:11PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > >
> > > Upstream commits to be applied
> > > ==============================
> > >
> > > e3fca9e: sched: Replace post_schedule with a balance callback list
> > > 4c9a4bc: sched: Allow balance callbacks for check_class_changed()
> > > 8046d68: sched,rt: Remove return value from pull_rt_task()
> > > fd7a4be: sched, rt: Convert switched_{from, to}_rt() / prio_changed_rt() to balance callbacks
> > > 0ea60c2: sched,dl: Remove return value from pull_dl_task()
> > > 9916e21: sched, dl: Convert switched_{from, to}_dl() / prio_changed_dl() to balance callbacks
> > >
> > > The reason why these should be applied
> > > ======================================
> > >
> > > Our products developed using 3.16 kernel, faced a kernel oops which can
> > > be fixed with above upstreamed patches. The oops is caused by "Unable
> > > to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000000xx"
> > > in the call path,
> > >
> > > __sched_setscheduler()
> > > check_class_changed()
> > > switched_to_fair()
> > > check_preempt_curr()
> > > check_preempt_wakeup()
> > > find_matching_se()
> > > is_same_group()
> > >
> > > by "if (se->cfs_rq == pse->cfs_rq) // se, pse == NULL" condition.
> > >
> > > How to apply it
> > > ===============
> > >
> > > For stable 4.2.8+:
> > > N/A (already applied)
> > >
> > > For longterm 4.1.15:
> > > Cherry-picking the upsteam commits works with a trivial conflict.
> > >
> > > For longterm 3.18.25:
> > > Refer to the backported patches in this thread.
> > >
> > > For longterm 3.14.58:
> > > Refer to the backported patches in this thread. And applying
> > > additional "6c3b4d4: sched: Clean up idle task SMP logic" commit
> > > makes backporting the upstream commits much simpler. So my
> > > backporting patches include the patch.
> >
> > All now applied to the 3.14-stable queue, thanks.
>
> Hello,
>
> I realized this was not applied to 3.18-stable yet.
>
> Is there any reason?
I don't maintain the 3.18-stable tree, so there's nothing I can do
there, please be patient and let the other stable maintainers catch up
on things...
thanks,
greg k-h
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-19 02:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rWqLL-4Rb-3@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1445422 |
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 09:09:45PM +0900, Greg KH wrote: > > > All now applied to the 3.14-stable queue, thanks. > > > > Hello, > > > > I realized this was not applied to 3.18-stable yet. > > > > Is there any reason? > > I don't maintain the 3.18-stable tree, so there's nothing I can do > there, please be patient and let the other stable maintainers catch up > on things... Ah. Thank you :) > > thanks, > > greg k-h
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web