Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1446016 > unrolled thread

[PATCH v3] virtio_blk: Fix a slient kernel panic

Started byMinfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com>
First post2016-07-19 06:40 +0200
Last post2016-07-23 04:10 +0200
Articles 3 — 3 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  [PATCH v3] virtio_blk: Fix a slient kernel panic Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com> - 2016-07-19 06:40 +0200
    Re: [PATCH v3] virtio_blk: Fix a slient kernel panic Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> - 2016-07-19 14:30 +0200
      Re: [PATCH v3] virtio_blk: Fix a slient kernel panic Minfei Huang <minfei.hmf@alibaba-inc.com> - 2016-07-23 04:10 +0200

#1446016 — [PATCH v3] virtio_blk: Fix a slient kernel panic

FromMinfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com>
Date2016-07-19 06:40 +0200
Subject[PATCH v3] virtio_blk: Fix a slient kernel panic
Message-ID<rWuZ3-7HB-3@gated-at.bofh.it>
From: Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com>

We do a lot of memory allocation in function init_vq, and don't handle
the allocation failure properly. Then this function will return 0,
although initialization fails due to lacking memory. At that moment,
kernel will panic in guest machine, if virtio is used to drive disk.

To fix this bug, we should take care of allocation failure, and return
correct value to let caller know what happen.

Tested-by: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <minfei.hmf@alibaba-inc.com>
Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com>
---
v2:
- Remove useless initialisation to NULL
v1:
- Refactor the patch to make code more readable
---
 drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 26 ++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
index 42758b5..4ee78c0 100644
--- a/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
+++ b/drivers/block/virtio_blk.c
@@ -394,22 +394,16 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
 		num_vqs = 1;
 
 	vblk->vqs = kmalloc(sizeof(*vblk->vqs) * num_vqs, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!vblk->vqs) {
-		err = -ENOMEM;
-		goto out;
-	}
+	if (!vblk->vqs)
+		return -ENOMEM;
 
 	names = kmalloc(sizeof(*names) * num_vqs, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!names)
-		goto err_names;
-
 	callbacks = kmalloc(sizeof(*callbacks) * num_vqs, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!callbacks)
-		goto err_callbacks;
-
 	vqs = kmalloc(sizeof(*vqs) * num_vqs, GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (!vqs)
-		goto err_vqs;
+	if (!names || !callbacks || !vqs) {
+		err = -ENOMEM;
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) {
 		callbacks[i] = virtblk_done;
@@ -420,7 +414,7 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
 	/* Discover virtqueues and write information to configuration.  */
 	err = vdev->config->find_vqs(vdev, num_vqs, vqs, callbacks, names);
 	if (err)
-		goto err_find_vqs;
+		goto out;
 
 	for (i = 0; i < num_vqs; i++) {
 		spin_lock_init(&vblk->vqs[i].lock);
@@ -428,16 +422,12 @@ static int init_vq(struct virtio_blk *vblk)
 	}
 	vblk->num_vqs = num_vqs;
 
- err_find_vqs:
+out:
 	kfree(vqs);
- err_vqs:
 	kfree(callbacks);
- err_callbacks:
 	kfree(names);
- err_names:
 	if (err)
 		kfree(vblk->vqs);
- out:
 	return err;
 }
 
-- 
2.7.4 (Apple Git-66)

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1446384

FromCornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Date2016-07-19 14:30 +0200
Message-ID<rWCjU-3Wt-23@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1446016
On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:32:42 +0800
Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com>
> 
> We do a lot of memory allocation in function init_vq, and don't handle
> the allocation failure properly. Then this function will return 0,
> although initialization fails due to lacking memory. At that moment,
> kernel will panic in guest machine, if virtio is used to drive disk.
> 
> To fix this bug, we should take care of allocation failure, and return
> correct value to let caller know what happen.
> 
> Tested-by: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <minfei.hmf@alibaba-inc.com>
> Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com>
> ---
> v2:
> - Remove useless initialisation to NULL
> v1:
> - Refactor the patch to make code more readable
> ---
>  drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 26 ++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

Your changes certainly make the function more compact.

Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#1448863

FromMinfei Huang <minfei.hmf@alibaba-inc.com>
Date2016-07-23 04:10 +0200
Message-ID<rXUy5-5oc-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1446384

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Ping, Any comment is appreciate.

Thanks
Minfei

> On Jul 19, 2016, at 20:22, Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 19 Jul 2016 12:32:42 +0800
> Minfei Huang <mnfhuang@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> From: Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com>
>> 
>> We do a lot of memory allocation in function init_vq, and don't handle
>> the allocation failure properly. Then this function will return 0,
>> although initialization fails due to lacking memory. At that moment,
>> kernel will panic in guest machine, if virtio is used to drive disk.
>> 
>> To fix this bug, we should take care of allocation failure, and return
>> correct value to let caller know what happen.
>> 
>> Tested-by: Chao Fan <fanc.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <minfei.hmf@alibaba-inc.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang <mnghuan@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> v2:
>> - Remove useless initialisation to NULL
>> v1:
>> - Refactor the patch to make code more readable
>> ---
>> drivers/block/virtio_blk.c | 26 ++++++++------------------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> 
> Your changes certainly make the function more compact.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web