Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1442735 > unrolled thread

Re: GPF in __mark_inode_dirty due to locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list returning NULL

Started byTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
First post2016-07-13 20:10 +0200
Last post2016-07-13 20:10 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: GPF in __mark_inode_dirty due to  locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list returning NULL Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> - 2016-07-13 20:10 +0200

#1442735 — Re: GPF in __mark_inode_dirty due to locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list returning NULL

FromTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Date2016-07-13 20:10 +0200
SubjectRe: GPF in __mark_inode_dirty due to locked_inode_to_wb_and_lock_list returning NULL
Message-ID<rUwLD-6Du-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hello,

On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:15:35PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
> So the btrfs fs was created inside a loop device and mounted with -o loop. 
> Evidently from the oops it seems that this is the normal umount path, meaning 
> that no device hot plugging was in action. Unfortunately I don't have a reproducer. 
> However, the workload looks like the following: 
> 
> 1. mount -t btrfs -o compress=zlib -o subvol="${subvol}" -o loop "${storage_file}" "${mount_point}"
> 2. Do reads/writes (rsync) (dirtying some pages)
> 3. umount "${mount_point}"

I see.  Yeah, normal umount path does destroy the block device and can
trigger the bug.  Please ping if the issue happens again with the
patches applied.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web