Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1442027 > unrolled thread

linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block tree

Started byStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
First post2016-07-13 08:20 +0200
Last post2016-07-13 18:40 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel


Contents

  linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block  tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-13 08:20 +0200
    Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block  tree Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk> - 2016-07-13 18:40 +0200

#1442027 — linux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block tree

FromStephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date2016-07-13 08:20 +0200
Subjectlinux-next: manual merge of the akpm-current tree with the block tree
Message-ID<rUlGy-7CR-13@gated-at.bofh.it>
Hi Andrew,

Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/nvme/host/core.c

between commit:

  f80ec966c19b ("nvme: Limit command retries")

from the block tree and commit:

  8cc07e463b0c ("NVMe: don't allocate unused nvme_major")

from the akpm-current tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 86a0c661e74c,3dc259e7bf2a..000000000000
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@@ -48,14 -47,6 +48,11 @@@ unsigned char shutdown_timeout = 5
  module_param(shutdown_timeout, byte, 0644);
  MODULE_PARM_DESC(shutdown_timeout, "timeout in seconds for controller shutdown");
  
 +unsigned int nvme_max_retries = 5;
 +module_param_named(max_retries, nvme_max_retries, uint, 0644);
 +MODULE_PARM_DESC(max_retries, "max number of retries a command may have");
 +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_max_retries);
 +
- static int nvme_major;
- module_param(nvme_major, int, 0);
- 
  static int nvme_char_major;
  module_param(nvme_char_major, int, 0);
  

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1442623

FromJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Date2016-07-13 18:40 +0200
Message-ID<rUvmx-5za-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1442027
On 07/12/2016 11:14 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the akpm-current tree got a conflict in:
>
>    drivers/nvme/host/core.c
>
> between commit:
>
>    f80ec966c19b ("nvme: Limit command retries")
>
> from the block tree and commit:
>
>    8cc07e463b0c ("NVMe: don't allocate unused nvme_major")
>
> from the akpm-current tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

Usually I'm not that picky with trivial stuff going through other trees, 
but with the amount of churn we have in NVMe, it really should go 
through the block tree.

-- 
Jens Axboe

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web