Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1442496 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-13 16:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-14 15:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PART2 PATCH v4 07/11] iommu/amd: Introduce amd_iommu_update_ga() Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-07-13 16:20 +0200
Re: [PART2 PATCH v4 07/11] iommu/amd: Introduce amd_iommu_update_ga() Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-07-14 15:50 +0200
Re: [PART2 PATCH v4 07/11] iommu/amd: Introduce amd_iommu_update_ga() Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> - 2016-07-14 15:50 +0200
| From | Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-13 16:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PART2 PATCH v4 07/11] iommu/amd: Introduce amd_iommu_update_ga() |
| Message-ID | <rUtb3-4bE-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
[I pasted v3 reviews prefixed with a pipe where I think they still apply.]
2016-07-13 08:20-0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit:
> From: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
>
> Introduces a new IOMMU API, amd_iommu_update_ga(), which allows
> KVM (SVM) to update existing posted interrupt IOMMU IRTE when
> load/unload vcpu.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suravee Suthikulpanit <Suravee.Suthikulpanit@amd.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
> @@ -4461,4 +4461,69 @@ int amd_iommu_create_irq_domain(struct amd_iommu *iommu)
> +int amd_iommu_update_ga(u32 vcpu_id, u32 cpu, u32 vm_id,
> + u64 base, bool is_run)
|2016-07-13 15:49+0700, Suravee Suthikulpanit:
|> On 07/12/2016 01:59 AM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
|>> Not just in this function does the interface between svm and iommu split
|>> ga_tag into its two components (vcpu_id and ga_tag), but it seems that
|>> the combined value could always be used instead ...
|>> Is there an advantage to passing two values?
|>
|> Here, the amd_iommu_update_ga() takes the two separate value for input
|> parameters. Mainly the ga_tag (which is really the vm_id) and vcpu_id. This
|> allow IOMMU driver to decide how to encode the GATAG to be programmed into
|> the IRTE. Currently, the actual GATAG is a 16-bit value, <vm_id><vcpu_id>.
|> This keeps the interface independent from how we encode the GATAG.
I was thinking about making the IOMMU unaware how SVM or other Linux
hypervisors use the ga_tag, i.e. passing the final u32 ga_tag.
For example 32 bit hypervisor doesn't need to use lookup, because any
pointer can used as the ga_tag directly. And there are other viable
algoritms for assigning the ga_tag -- why isn't the vm_id 24 bits?
> + unsigned long flags;
> + struct amd_iommu *iommu;
> +
> + if (!AMD_IOMMU_GUEST_IR_VAPIC(amd_iommu_guest_ir))
> + return 0;
> +
> + for_each_iommu(iommu) {
> + struct amd_ir_data *ir_data;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->gatag_ir_hash_lock, flags);
> +
> + /* Note:
> + * We need to update all interrupt remapping table entries
> + * for targeting the specified vcpu. Here, we use gatag
> + * as a hash key and iterate through all entries in the bucket.
> + */
> + hash_for_each_possible(iommu->gatag_ir_hash, ir_data, hnode,
> + AMD_IOMMU_GATAG(vm_id, vcpu_id)) {
> + struct irte_ga *irte = (struct irte_ga *) ir_data->entry;
|>> (The ga_tag check is missing here too.)
|>
|> Here, the intention is to update all interrupt remapping entries in the
|> bucket w/ the same GATAG (i.e. vm_id + vcpu_id), where GATAG =
|> AMD_IOMMU_GATAG(vm_id, vcpu_id).
Which is why you need to check that
AMD_IOMMU_GATAG(vm_id, vcpu_id) == entry->fields_vapic.ga_tag
The hashing function can map two different vm_id + vcpu_id to the same
bucket and hash_for_each_possible() would return both of them, but only
one belongs to the VCPU that we want to update.
(And shouldn't there be only one match?)
> +
> + if (!irte->lo.fields_vapic.guest_mode)
> + continue;
> +
> + update_irte_ga((struct irte_ga *)ir_data->ref,
> + ir_data->irq_2_irte.devid,
> + base, cpu, is_run);
|>> (The lookup leading up to here is avoidable -- svm, the caller, has the
|>> ability to map ga_tag into irte/ir_data directly with a pointer.
|>> I'm not sure if the lookup is slow enough to pardon optimization, but
|>> it might make the code simpler as well.)
|>
|> I might have mislead you up to this point. Not sure if the assumption here
|> still hold with my explanation above. Sorry for confusion.
SVM configures IOMMU with ga_tag, so IOMMU could return the pointer to
ir_data/irte that was just configured. SVM would couple it with a VCPU
(and hence a ga_tag) and when amd_iommu_update_ga() was needed, SVM
would pass the ir_data/irte pointer directly, instead of looking it up
though a ga_tag.
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-14 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rUPbA-1TY-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1442496 |
2016-07-14 16:33+0700, Suravee Suthikulpanit:
> On 7/14/16 16:13, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
>> > > unsigned long flags;
>> > > + struct amd_iommu *iommu;
>> > > +
>> > > + if (!AMD_IOMMU_GUEST_IR_VAPIC(amd_iommu_guest_ir))
>> > > + return 0;
>> > > +
>> > > + for_each_iommu(iommu) {
>> > > + struct amd_ir_data *ir_data;
>> > > +
>> > > + spin_lock_irqsave(&iommu->gatag_ir_hash_lock, flags);
>> > > +
>> > > + /* Note:
>> > > + * We need to update all interrupt remapping table entries
>> > > + * for targeting the specified vcpu. Here, we use gatag
>> > > + * as a hash key and iterate through all entries in the bucket.
>> > > + */
>> > > + hash_for_each_possible(iommu->gatag_ir_hash, ir_data, hnode,
>> > > + AMD_IOMMU_GATAG(vm_id, vcpu_id)) {
>> > > + struct irte_ga *irte = (struct irte_ga *) ir_data->entry;
>> >
>> > |>> (The ga_tag check is missing here too.)
>> > |>
>> > |> Here, the intention is to update all interrupt remapping entries in
>> > the
>> > |> bucket w/ the same GATAG (i.e. vm_id + vcpu_id), where GATAG =
>> > |> AMD_IOMMU_GATAG(vm_id, vcpu_id).
>> >
>> > Which is why you need to check that
>> > AMD_IOMMU_GATAG(vm_id, vcpu_id) == entry->fields_vapic.ga_tag
>> >
>> > The hashing function can map two different vm_id + vcpu_id to the same
>> > bucket and hash_for_each_possible() would return both of them, but only
>> > one belongs to the VCPU that we want to update.
>> >
>> > (And shouldn't there be only one match?)
>>
>> Actually, with your suggestion above, the hask key would be (vm_id &
>> 0x3FFFFF << 8)| (vcpu_id & 0xFF). So, it should be unique for each vcpu
>> of each vm, or am I still missing something?
>
> Ok, one scenario would be when SVM run out of the VM_ID and having to start
> re-using them. Since we want SVM to generate ga_tag and just pass into IOMMU
> driver for it to program the IRTE, we probably can make an assumption that
> SVM would make sure that ga_tag would not conflict for each vm_id/vcpu_id.
I agree, it could enable doorbell to an unscheduled VCPU and therefore
lose the notification.
The per-vcpu list of IRTEs would solve it as well, but making sure that
no two VMs have the same id might be easier and 2^22 active VMs should
be more than enough. :)
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Radim Krčmář <rkrcmar@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-14 15:50 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rUPbA-1TY-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1442496 |
2016-07-14 16:13+0700, Suravee Suthikulpanit:
> On 7/13/16 21:14, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> 2016-07-13 08:20-0500, Suravee Suthikulpanit:
>> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd_iommu.c
>> > @@ -4461,4 +4461,69 @@ int amd_iommu_create_irq_domain(struct amd_iommu *iommu)
>> > +int amd_iommu_update_ga(u32 vcpu_id, u32 cpu, u32 vm_id,
>> > + u64 base, bool is_run)
>>
>> |2016-07-13 15:49+0700, Suravee Suthikulpanit:
>> |> On 07/12/2016 01:59 AM, Radim Krčmář wrote:
>> |>> Not just in this function does the interface between svm and iommu split
>> |>> ga_tag into its two components (vcpu_id and ga_tag), but it seems that
>> |>> the combined value could always be used instead ...
>> |>> Is there an advantage to passing two values?
>> |>
>> |> Here, the amd_iommu_update_ga() takes the two separate value for input
>> |> parameters. Mainly the ga_tag (which is really the vm_id) and vcpu_id. This
>> |> allow IOMMU driver to decide how to encode the GATAG to be programmed into
>> |> the IRTE. Currently, the actual GATAG is a 16-bit value, <vm_id><vcpu_id>.
>> |> This keeps the interface independent from how we encode the GATAG.
>>
>> I was thinking about making the IOMMU unaware how SVM or other Linux
>> hypervisors use the ga_tag, i.e. passing the final u32 ga_tag.
>> For example 32 bit hypervisor doesn't need to use lookup, because any
>> pointer can used as the ga_tag directly.
>
> Ahh....... (w/ a big light bulb)
> I get your point now. Let's just have SVM (or other hypervisor) define what
> the tag should be and just pass-on the value to IOMMU. IOMMU can just simply
> use this w/o knowing what it is. Sorry, I'm slow :)
That is what I meant, but misunderstanding is a product of both
participants. I didn't write it clearly on the first try.
>> > + hash_for_each_possible(iommu->gatag_ir_hash, ir_data, hnode,
>> > + AMD_IOMMU_GATAG(vm_id, vcpu_id)) {
>> > + struct irte_ga *irte = (struct irte_ga *) ir_data->entry;
>>
>> |>> (The ga_tag check is missing here too.)
>> |>
>> |> Here, the intention is to update all interrupt remapping entries in the
>> |> bucket w/ the same GATAG (i.e. vm_id + vcpu_id), where GATAG =
>> |> AMD_IOMMU_GATAG(vm_id, vcpu_id).
>>
>> Which is why you need to check that
>> AMD_IOMMU_GATAG(vm_id, vcpu_id) == entry->fields_vapic.ga_tag
>>
>> The hashing function can map two different vm_id + vcpu_id to the same
>> bucket and hash_for_each_possible() would return both of them, but only
>> one belongs to the VCPU that we want to update.
>>
>> (And shouldn't there be only one match?)
>
> Actually, with your suggestion above, the hask key would be (vm_id &
> 0x3FFFFF << 8)| (vcpu_id & 0xFF). So, it should be unique for each vcpu of
> each vm, or am I still missing something?
[Reply in the followup mail.]
> Also, since we will not be passing the vmid and vcpuid as separate value,
> and just passing the (u32)ga_tag, we would not be able to do the check you
> suggested here.
There will be the u32 ga_tag argument, so you would still do
ga_tag == entry->fields_vapic.ga_tag
Because even if the ga_tag is unique for every vcpu, the hash table will
mix various vcpus into one bucket and you need to filter them.
>> > + update_irte_ga((struct irte_ga *)ir_data->ref,
>> > + ir_data->irq_2_irte.devid,
>> > + base, cpu, is_run);
>>
>> |>> (The lookup leading up to here is avoidable -- svm, the caller, has the
>> |>> ability to map ga_tag into irte/ir_data directly with a pointer.
>
> I'm not sure about this optimization to avoid look up.
>
> The struct amd_ir_data is part of the IOMMU driver, and the SVM knows
> nothing about it. I don't think it would be able to find out the pointer to
> amd_ir_data/irte.
Yeah, SVM would store it in a "void *" pointer, because it doesn't need
to know anything else, but you still need to retrieve it from IOMMU,
which could be done through vcpu_info argument to
amd_ir_set_vcpu_affinity().
(I am not sure if it doesn't breach isolation of IOMMU, so we might not
want to do it in any case ...)
> Also, with the current design, each ga_tag can be mapped to different irte
> since there could be multiple interrupts targeting a particular cpu. Here,
> we would want to update all of the IRTEs with the same ga_tag.
True, that design is good. SVM would need a list of pointers for each
vcpu to cope with it ...
>> |>> I'm not sure if the lookup is slow enough to pardon optimization, but
>> |>> it might make the code simpler as well.)
>> |>
>> |> I might have mislead you up to this point. Not sure if the assumption here
>> |> still hold with my explanation above. Sorry for confusion.
>>
>> SVM configures IOMMU with ga_tag, so IOMMU could return the pointer to
>> ir_data/irte that was just configured.
>
> Also, IIUC, you want to use the pointer to ir_data/irte as the ga_tag value.
> The issue would be ga_tag is a 32-bit value, and this would not work with
> 64-bit address.
I mean something slightly different. Instead of passing ga_tag into
amd_iommu_update_ga(), just pass void * of whatever IOMMU provided back
when SVM configured the interrupt. ga_tag will never come into play.
(The vcpu lookup from ga_tag is necessary, when processing the queue of
undelivered interrupts. ir_data lookup can be avoided.)
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web