Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1440963 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-12 01:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-13 02:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP in task_numa_migrate - handle_mm_fault vanilla 4.4.6 Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> - 2016-07-12 01:10 +0200
Re: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP in task_numa_migrate - handle_mm_fault vanilla 4.4.6 Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> - 2016-07-12 15:20 +0200
Re: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP in task_numa_migrate - handle_mm_fault vanilla 4.4.6 Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> - 2016-07-13 02:30 +0200
| From | Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-12 01:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: divide error: 0000 [#1] SMP in task_numa_migrate - handle_mm_fault vanilla 4.4.6 |
| Message-ID | <rTSuR-5aQ-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 09:42:32AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 11:20:36AM +1200, Campbell Steven wrote: > > > > commit 8974189222159154c55f24ddad33e3613960521a > > > Author: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> > > > Date: Thu Jun 16 10:50:40 2016 +0200 > > > Since these early reports from Stefan and I it looks like it's been > > hit but alot more folks now so I'd like to ask what the process is for > > getting this backported into 4.6, 4.5 and 4.4 as in our testing all > > those versions for their latest point release seem to have the same > > problem. > > I think this should do; Greg is on Cc and will mark the commit > somewhere. It is already in Linus' tree and should indeed be sufficient. > > It has a Fixes tag referring the commit that introduced it, which IIRC > is somewhere around v4.2. > > Greg, anything else required? Oops, this commit does not apply cleanly to 4.6 or 4.4-stable trees. Can someone send me the backported verision that they have tested to work properly so I can queue it up? thanks, greg k-h
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-12 15:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rU5Lr-5nC-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1440963 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:33:53PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > Oops, this commit does not apply cleanly to 4.6 or 4.4-stable trees. > Can someone send me the backported verision that they have tested to > work properly so I can queue it up? I've never actually been able to reproduce, but the attached patches apply, the reject was trivial. They seem to compile and boot on my main test rig, but nothing else was done but build the next kernel with it.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-13 02:30 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rUgdQ-3RK-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1441344 |
On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 03:12:35PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 03:33:53PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > Oops, this commit does not apply cleanly to 4.6 or 4.4-stable trees. > > Can someone send me the backported verision that they have tested to > > work properly so I can queue it up? > > I've never actually been able to reproduce, but the attached patches > apply, the reject was trivial. > > They seem to compile and boot on my main test rig, but nothing else was > done but build the next kernel with it. Thanks for these, now applied. greg k-h
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web