Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1441919 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] bpf: avoid stack copy and use skb ctx for event output

Started byDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
First post2016-07-13 01:50 +0200
Last post2016-07-13 02:10 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] bpf: avoid stack copy and use skb ctx for  event output Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> - 2016-07-13 01:50 +0200
    Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] bpf: avoid stack copy and use skb ctx for  event output Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-07-13 02:10 +0200

#1441919 — Re: [PATCH net-next 3/3] bpf: avoid stack copy and use skb ctx for event output

FromDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date2016-07-13 01:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH net-next 3/3] bpf: avoid stack copy and use skb ctx for event output
Message-ID<rUfB7-3og-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 07/13/2016 01:25 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]
>
> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Borkmann/BPF-event-output-helper-improvements/20160713-065944
> config: s390-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: s390x-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 5.3.1-8) 5.3.1 20160205
> reproduce:
>          wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>          chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>          make.cross ARCH=s390
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
>     kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function 'bpf_perf_event_output':
>     kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:284:1: warning: 'bpf_perf_event_output' uses dynamic stack allocation
>      }
>      ^
>     kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function 'bpf_event_output':
>>> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:319:1: warning: 'bpf_event_output' uses dynamic stack allocation
>      }
>      ^

Hmm, searching a bit on lkml, it seems these warnings on s390 are actually mostly
harmless I believe [1][2] ... looks like they are there to find structs sitting
on stack, for example, at least that's also what the currently existing one in the
above line (bpf_trace.c +284) appears to be about.

Thanks,
Daniel

   [1] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1601.2/04074.html
   [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/25/42

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1441924

FromFengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com>
Date2016-07-13 02:10 +0200
Message-ID<rUfUu-3Km-9@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1441919
Hi Daniel,

On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 01:45:47AM +0200, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
>On 07/13/2016 01:25 AM, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> [auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]
>>
>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Daniel-Borkmann/BPF-event-output-helper-improvements/20160713-065944
>> config: s390-allyesconfig (attached as .config)
>> compiler: s390x-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 5.3.1-8) 5.3.1 20160205
>> reproduce:
>>          wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
>>          chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
>>          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>          make.cross ARCH=s390
>>
>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>     kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function 'bpf_perf_event_output':
>>     kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:284:1: warning: 'bpf_perf_event_output' uses dynamic stack allocation
>>      }
>>      ^
>>     kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c: In function 'bpf_event_output':
>>>> kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c:319:1: warning: 'bpf_event_output' uses dynamic stack allocation
>>      }
>>      ^
>
>Hmm, searching a bit on lkml, it seems these warnings on s390 are actually mostly
>harmless I believe [1][2] ... looks like they are there to find structs sitting
>on stack, for example, at least that's also what the currently existing one in the
>above line (bpf_trace.c +284) appears to be about.

Yes it does look so. All such warnings happen only in s390:

% g -h -o '[^ ]*config' *dynamic-stack* | sort | uniq -c | sort -nr
    118 s390-allyesconfig
     80 s390-allmodconfig

Let's ignore all of them on s390.

Thanks,
Fengguang

>   [1] http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/1601.2/04074.html
>   [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/25/42

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web