Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > linux.kernel > #1442779 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH 2/5] remoteproc: core: Add rproc OF look-up functions

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: [PATCH 2/5] remoteproc: core: Add rproc OF look-up functions Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org> - 2016-07-13 21:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/5] remoteproc: core: Add rproc OF look-up functions Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> - 2016-07-14 09:00 +0200

#1442779 — Re: [PATCH 2/5] remoteproc: core: Add rproc OF look-up functions

On Thu 05 May 06:29 PDT 2016, Lee Jones wrote:

Lee,

I ran into this topic again while looking into some unrelated things.

> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> +struct rproc *of_rproc_byindex(struct device_node *np, int index)
> +{
> +	struct rproc *rproc;
> +	struct device_node *rproc_node;
> +	struct platform_device *pdev;
> +	struct klist_iter i;
> +
> +	if (index < 0)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> +	rproc_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "rprocs", index);
> +	if (!rproc_node)

As I stated before I would like for you to use the existing rproc_list,
as done in rproc_get_by_phandle() today.

But as you resend this patch, could you please make this check fallback
to also checking for "ti,rproc", then simply drop the existing
rproc_get_by_phandle() and change the call to
of_rproc_byindex(dev->of_node, 0) in wkup_m3_ipc.c?

That way we're backwards compatible with the TI wakeup M3, without
having to maintain the then non-standard generic rproc phandle resolver.

> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +
> +	pdev = of_find_device_by_node(rproc_node);
> +	if (!pdev)
> +		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +
> +	klist_iter_init(&rprocs, &i);
> +	while ((rproc = next_rproc(&i)) != NULL)
> +		if (rproc->dev.parent == &pdev->dev)
> +			break;
> +	klist_iter_exit(&i);
> +
> +	return rproc;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_rproc_byindex);

Regards,
Bjorn

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#1443108

On Wed, 13 Jul 2016, Bjorn Andersson wrote:

> On Thu 05 May 06:29 PDT 2016, Lee Jones wrote:
> 
> Lee,
> 
> I ran into this topic again while looking into some unrelated things.
> 
> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
> > +struct rproc *of_rproc_byindex(struct device_node *np, int index)
> > +{
> > +	struct rproc *rproc;
> > +	struct device_node *rproc_node;
> > +	struct platform_device *pdev;
> > +	struct klist_iter i;
> > +
> > +	if (index < 0)
> > +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> > +
> > +	rproc_node = of_parse_phandle(np, "rprocs", index);
> > +	if (!rproc_node)
> 
> As I stated before I would like for you to use the existing rproc_list,
> as done in rproc_get_by_phandle() today.
> 
> But as you resend this patch, could you please make this check fallback
> to also checking for "ti,rproc", then simply drop the existing
> rproc_get_by_phandle() and change the call to
> of_rproc_byindex(dev->of_node, 0) in wkup_m3_ipc.c?
> 
> That way we're backwards compatible with the TI wakeup M3, without
> having to maintain the then non-standard generic rproc phandle resolver.

I started working on this yesterday.  Should be with you soon.

> > +		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> > +
> > +	pdev = of_find_device_by_node(rproc_node);
> > +	if (!pdev)
> > +		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> > +
> > +	klist_iter_init(&rprocs, &i);
> > +	while ((rproc = next_rproc(&i)) != NULL)
> > +		if (rproc->dev.parent == &pdev->dev)
> > +			break;
> > +	klist_iter_exit(&i);
> > +
> > +	return rproc;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL(of_rproc_byindex);
> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel

csiph-web