Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1441053 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-12 06:10 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-12 17:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 3 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the pm tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-12 06:10 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the pm tree "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> - 2016-07-12 14:10 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the pm tree Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> - 2016-07-12 17:40 +0200
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-12 06:10 +0200 |
| Subject | linux-next: manual merge of the xen-tip tree with the pm tree |
| Message-ID | <rTXbb-8eD-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the xen-tip tree got a conflict in:
drivers/acpi/scan.c
between commit:
68bdb6773289 ("ACPI: add support for ACPI reconfiguration notifiers")
from the pm tree and commit:
c8ac8b6fb495 ("Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen")
from the xen-tip tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc drivers/acpi/scan.c
index 405056b95b05,cfc73fecaba4..000000000000
--- a/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@@ -1925,8 -1961,19 +1970,21 @@@ static int acpi_bus_scan_fixed(void
return result < 0 ? result : 0;
}
+ static void __init acpi_get_spcr_uart_addr(void)
+ {
+ acpi_status status;
+ struct acpi_table_spcr *spcr_ptr;
+
+ status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_SPCR, 0,
+ (struct acpi_table_header **)&spcr_ptr);
+ if (ACPI_SUCCESS(status))
+ spcr_uart_addr = spcr_ptr->serial_port.address;
+ else
+ printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "STAO table present, but SPCR is missing\n");
+ }
+
+static bool acpi_scan_initialized;
+
int __init acpi_scan_init(void)
{
int result;
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-12 14:10 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rU4FI-4He-19@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1441053 |
On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 02:09:26 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the xen-tip tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/acpi/scan.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 68bdb6773289 ("ACPI: add support for ACPI reconfiguration notifiers")
>
> from the pm tree and commit:
>
> c8ac8b6fb495 ("Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen")
>
> from the xen-tip tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
Looks good to me, thanks Stehpen!
Best,
Rafael
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-12 17:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rU7WW-6Ps-39@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1441297 |
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 02:09:26 PM Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the xen-tip tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > drivers/acpi/scan.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 68bdb6773289 ("ACPI: add support for ACPI reconfiguration notifiers")
> >
> > from the pm tree and commit:
> >
> > c8ac8b6fb495 ("Xen: ACPI: Hide UART used by Xen")
> >
> > from the xen-tip tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
>
> Looks good to me, thanks Stehpen!
Looks good to me too.
Cheers,
Stefano
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web