Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1441395 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-12 16:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-12 16:40 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH] kasan: use \n with pr_emerg Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> - 2016-07-12 16:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH] kasan: use \n with pr_emerg Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> - 2016-07-12 16:40 +0200
| From | Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-12 16:20 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH] kasan: use \n with pr_emerg |
| Message-ID | <rU6Hw-62T-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
I'm seeing this in the kernel log:
kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled
kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory accessgeneral protection fault: 0000 [#1] KASAN
CPU: 0 PID: 56 Comm: ext4.exe Not tainted 4.7.0-rc6 #1
We really ought to be using \n with pr_*() so the 'general protection
fault...' starts on a line of its own. With this patch it looks better:
kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled
kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access
general protection fault: 0000 [#1] KASAN
CPU: 0 PID: 56 Comm: ext4.exe Not tainted 4.7.0-rc7+ #650
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Signed-off-by: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c b/arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c
index 1b1110f..0493c17 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/kasan_init_64.c
@@ -54,8 +54,8 @@ static int kasan_die_handler(struct notifier_block *self,
void *data)
{
if (val == DIE_GPF) {
- pr_emerg("CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled");
- pr_emerg("GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access");
+ pr_emerg("CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled\n");
+ pr_emerg("GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access\n");
}
return NOTIFY_OK;
}
--
1.9.1
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-12 16:40 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rU70T-6aC-75@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1441395 |
On 07/12/2016 04:27 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote: > On 07/12/2016 05:16 PM, Vegard Nossum wrote: >> We really ought to be using \n with pr_*() so the 'general protection >> fault...' starts on a line of its own. With this patch it looks better: >> >> kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled >> kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access >> general protection fault: 0000 [#1] KASAN >> CPU: 0 PID: 56 Comm: ext4.exe Not tainted 4.7.0-rc7+ #650 >> > > Dmitry fixed that already: http://lkml.kernel.org/g/<1467294357-98002-1-git-send-email-dvyukov@google.com> > Great, thanks :-) Vegard
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web