Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1439631 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-08 18:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-11 19:10 +0200 |
| Articles | 8 — 5 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH 3/7] security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> - 2016-07-08 18:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/7] security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-07-08 19:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/7] security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> - 2016-07-11 15:50 +0200
Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH 3/7] security, overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com> - 2016-07-11 16:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/7] security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-07-12 02:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/7] security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> - 2016-07-11 17:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/7] security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> - 2016-07-11 19:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH 3/7] security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> - 2016-07-11 19:10 +0200
| From | Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-08 18:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH 3/7] security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file |
| Message-ID | <rSGP8-79Y-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Provide a security hook which is called when xattrs of a file are being
copied up. This hook is called once for each xattr and LSM can return 0
to access the xattr, 1 to reject xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP if none of the lsms
claim to know xattr and a negative error code if something went terribly
wrong.
If 0 or -EOPNOTSUPP is returned, xattr will be copied up, if 1 is returned,
xattr will not be copied up and if negative error code is returned, copy up
will be aborted.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c | 7 +++++++
include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 10 ++++++++++
include/linux/security.h | 6 ++++++
security/security.c | 8 ++++++++
4 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
index 8ebea18..68cefb2 100644
--- a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
+++ b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
@@ -103,6 +103,13 @@ retry:
goto retry;
}
+ error = security_inode_copy_up_xattr(name);
+ if (error < 0 && error != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+ break;
+ if (error == 1) {
+ error = 0;
+ continue; /* Discard */
+ }
error = vfs_setxattr(new, name, value, size, 0);
if (error)
break;
diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
index c1f95be..84caead 100644
--- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
+++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
@@ -410,6 +410,14 @@
* @src indicates the union dentry of file that is being copied up.
* @new pointer to pointer to return newly allocated creds.
* Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on error.
+ * @inode_copy_up_xattr:
+ * Filter the xattrs being copied up when a unioned file is copied
+ * up from a lower layer to the union/overlay layer.
+ * @name indicates the name of the xattr.
+ * Returns 0 to accept the xattr, 1 to discard the xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP if
+ * security module does not know about attribute or a negative error code
+ * to abort the copy up. Note that the caller is responsible for reading
+ * and writing the xattrs as this hook is merely a filter.
*
* Security hooks for file operations
*
@@ -1435,6 +1443,7 @@ union security_list_options {
size_t buffer_size);
void (*inode_getsecid)(struct inode *inode, u32 *secid);
int (*inode_copy_up) (struct dentry *src, struct cred **new);
+ int (*inode_copy_up_xattr) (const char *name);
int (*file_permission)(struct file *file, int mask);
int (*file_alloc_security)(struct file *file);
@@ -1707,6 +1716,7 @@ struct security_hook_heads {
struct list_head inode_listsecurity;
struct list_head inode_getsecid;
struct list_head inode_copy_up;
+ struct list_head inode_copy_up_xattr;
struct list_head file_permission;
struct list_head file_alloc_security;
struct list_head file_free_security;
diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
index c976d79..08d3191 100644
--- a/include/linux/security.h
+++ b/include/linux/security.h
@@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ int security_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name, const void
int security_inode_listsecurity(struct inode *inode, char *buffer, size_t buffer_size);
void security_inode_getsecid(struct inode *inode, u32 *secid);
int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new);
+int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name);
int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask);
int security_file_alloc(struct file *file);
void security_file_free(struct file *file);
@@ -764,6 +765,11 @@ static inline int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new)
return 0;
}
+static inline int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
+{
+ -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
static inline int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask)
{
return 0;
diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
index 3d142aa..3321e31 100644
--- a/security/security.c
+++ b/security/security.c
@@ -733,6 +733,12 @@ int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_copy_up);
+int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
+{
+ return call_int_hook(inode_copy_up_xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP, name);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_copy_up_xattr);
+
int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask)
{
int ret;
@@ -1671,6 +1677,8 @@ struct security_hook_heads security_hook_heads = {
LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.inode_getsecid),
.inode_copy_up =
LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.inode_copy_up),
+ .inode_copy_up_xattr =
+ LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.inode_copy_up_xattr),
.file_permission =
LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.file_permission),
.file_alloc_security =
--
2.7.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-08 19:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/7] security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file |
| Message-ID | <rSI4x-7VV-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1439631 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
Hi,
[auto build test ERROR on next-20160708]
[also build test ERROR on v4.7-rc6]
[cannot apply to pcmoore-selinux/next security/next v4.7-rc6 v4.7-rc5 v4.7-rc4]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vivek-Goyal/Overlayfs-SELinux-Support/20160709-002635
config: mips-gpr_defconfig (attached as .config)
compiler: mips-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 5.3.1-8) 5.3.1 20160205
reproduce:
wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
make.cross ARCH=mips
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c:27:0:
include/linux/security.h: In function 'security_inode_copy_up_xattr':
>> include/linux/security.h:770:2: error: statement with no effect [-Werror=unused-value]
-EOPNOTSUPP;
^
include/linux/security.h:771:1: error: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Werror=return-type]
}
^
cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
vim +770 include/linux/security.h
764 {
765 return 0;
766 }
767
768 static inline int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
769 {
> 770 -EOPNOTSUPP;
771 }
772
773 static inline int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask)
---
0-DAY kernel test infrastructure Open Source Technology Center
https://lists.01.org/pipermail/kbuild-all Intel Corporation
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-11 15:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/7] security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file |
| Message-ID | <rTJKW-7HY-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1439723 |
On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 01:41:38AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [auto build test ERROR on next-20160708]
> [also build test ERROR on v4.7-rc6]
> [cannot apply to pcmoore-selinux/next security/next v4.7-rc6 v4.7-rc5 v4.7-rc4]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system]
These patches should be applied on top of overlayfs-next branch of
miklos's vfs tree.
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git overlayfs-next
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Vivek-Goyal/Overlayfs-SELinux-Support/20160709-002635
> config: mips-gpr_defconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: mips-linux-gnu-gcc (Debian 5.3.1-8) 5.3.1 20160205
> reproduce:
> wget https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/wfg/lkp-tests.git/plain/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make.cross ARCH=mips
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c:27:0:
> include/linux/security.h: In function 'security_inode_copy_up_xattr':
> >> include/linux/security.h:770:2: error: statement with no effect [-Werror=unused-value]
> -EOPNOTSUPP;
> ^
> include/linux/security.h:771:1: error: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Werror=return-type]
> }
Typo. No "return" keyword. Fixed in attached patch.
Subject: security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file
Provide a security hook which is called when xattrs of a file are being
copied up. This hook is called once for each xattr and LSM can return 0
to access the xattr, 1 to reject xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP if none of the lsms
claim to know xattr and a negative error code if something went terribly
wrong.
If 0 or -EOPNOTSUPP is returned, xattr will be copied up, if 1 is returned,
xattr will not be copied up and if negative error code is returned, copy up
will be aborted.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
---
fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c | 7 +++++++
include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 10 ++++++++++
include/linux/security.h | 6 ++++++
security/security.c | 8 ++++++++
4 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
Index: rhvgoyal-linux/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
===================================================================
--- rhvgoyal-linux.orig/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h 2016-07-11 09:23:09.113863783 -0400
+++ rhvgoyal-linux/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h 2016-07-11 09:23:15.541863783 -0400
@@ -410,6 +410,14 @@
* @src indicates the union dentry of file that is being copied up.
* @new pointer to pointer to return newly allocated creds.
* Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on error.
+ * @inode_copy_up_xattr:
+ * Filter the xattrs being copied up when a unioned file is copied
+ * up from a lower layer to the union/overlay layer.
+ * @name indicates the name of the xattr.
+ * Returns 0 to accept the xattr, 1 to discard the xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP if
+ * security module does not know about attribute or a negative error code
+ * to abort the copy up. Note that the caller is responsible for reading
+ * and writing the xattrs as this hook is merely a filter.
*
* Security hooks for file operations
*
@@ -1435,6 +1443,7 @@ union security_list_options {
size_t buffer_size);
void (*inode_getsecid)(struct inode *inode, u32 *secid);
int (*inode_copy_up) (struct dentry *src, struct cred **new);
+ int (*inode_copy_up_xattr) (const char *name);
int (*file_permission)(struct file *file, int mask);
int (*file_alloc_security)(struct file *file);
@@ -1707,6 +1716,7 @@ struct security_hook_heads {
struct list_head inode_listsecurity;
struct list_head inode_getsecid;
struct list_head inode_copy_up;
+ struct list_head inode_copy_up_xattr;
struct list_head file_permission;
struct list_head file_alloc_security;
struct list_head file_free_security;
Index: rhvgoyal-linux/include/linux/security.h
===================================================================
--- rhvgoyal-linux.orig/include/linux/security.h 2016-07-11 09:23:09.117863783 -0400
+++ rhvgoyal-linux/include/linux/security.h 2016-07-11 09:23:48.528863783 -0400
@@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ int security_inode_setsecurity(struct in
int security_inode_listsecurity(struct inode *inode, char *buffer, size_t buffer_size);
void security_inode_getsecid(struct inode *inode, u32 *secid);
int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new);
+int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name);
int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask);
int security_file_alloc(struct file *file);
void security_file_free(struct file *file);
@@ -764,6 +765,11 @@ static inline int security_inode_copy_up
return 0;
}
+static inline int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
+{
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+}
+
static inline int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask)
{
return 0;
Index: rhvgoyal-linux/security/security.c
===================================================================
--- rhvgoyal-linux.orig/security/security.c 2016-07-11 09:23:09.119863783 -0400
+++ rhvgoyal-linux/security/security.c 2016-07-11 09:23:15.544863783 -0400
@@ -733,6 +733,12 @@ int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_copy_up);
+int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
+{
+ return call_int_hook(inode_copy_up_xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP, name);
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_copy_up_xattr);
+
int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask)
{
int ret;
@@ -1671,6 +1677,8 @@ struct security_hook_heads security_hook
LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.inode_getsecid),
.inode_copy_up =
LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.inode_copy_up),
+ .inode_copy_up_xattr =
+ LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.inode_copy_up_xattr),
.file_permission =
LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.file_permission),
.file_alloc_security =
Index: rhvgoyal-linux/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
===================================================================
--- rhvgoyal-linux.orig/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c 2016-07-11 09:23:09.120863783 -0400
+++ rhvgoyal-linux/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c 2016-07-11 09:23:15.544863783 -0400
@@ -103,6 +103,13 @@ retry:
goto retry;
}
+ error = security_inode_copy_up_xattr(name);
+ if (error < 0 && error != -EOPNOTSUPP)
+ break;
+ if (error == 1) {
+ error = 0;
+ continue; /* Discard */
+ }
error = vfs_setxattr(new, name, value, size, 0);
if (error)
break;
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fengguang Wu <lkp@intel.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-11 16:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [kbuild-all] [PATCH 3/7] security, overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file |
| Message-ID | <rTJUC-7Ln-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1440625 |
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 09:40:04AM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: >On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 01:41:38AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: >> Hi, >> >> [auto build test ERROR on next-20160708] >> [also build test ERROR on v4.7-rc6] >> [cannot apply to pcmoore-selinux/next security/next v4.7-rc6 v4.7-rc5 v4.7-rc4] >> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] > >These patches should be applied on top of overlayfs-next branch of >miklos's vfs tree. > >git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git overlayfs-next Good to know that, thank you for the info! Thanks, Fengguang
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-12 02:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/7] security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file |
| Message-ID | <rTTqW-5Lo-17@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1440625 |
Hi Vivek, On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 09:40:04 -0400 Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 01:41:38AM +0800, kbuild test robot wrote: > > Hi, > > > > [auto build test ERROR on next-20160708] > > [also build test ERROR on v4.7-rc6] > > [cannot apply to pcmoore-selinux/next security/next v4.7-rc6 v4.7-rc5 v4.7-rc4] > > [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help improve the system] > > These patches should be applied on top of overlayfs-next branch of > miklos's vfs tree. > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mszeredi/vfs.git overlayfs-next That is included in linux-next ... -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stephen Smalley <sds@tycho.nsa.gov> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-11 17:40 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/7] security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file |
| Message-ID | <rTLtn-rG-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1439631 |
On 07/08/2016 12:19 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote:
> Provide a security hook which is called when xattrs of a file are being
> copied up. This hook is called once for each xattr and LSM can return 0
> to access the xattr, 1 to reject xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP if none of the lsms
> claim to know xattr and a negative error code if something went terribly
> wrong.
0 if the security module wants the xattr to be copied up, 1 if the
security module wants the xattr to be discarded on the copy, -EOPNOTSUPP
if the security module does not handle/manage the xattr, or a -errno
upon an error.
>
> If 0 or -EOPNOTSUPP is returned, xattr will be copied up, if 1 is returned,
> xattr will not be copied up and if negative error code is returned, copy up
> will be aborted.
Not sure I understand the benefit of the 0 vs -EOPNOTSUPP distinction.
>
> Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com>
> ---
> fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c | 7 +++++++
> include/linux/lsm_hooks.h | 10 ++++++++++
> include/linux/security.h | 6 ++++++
> security/security.c | 8 ++++++++
> 4 files changed, 31 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> index 8ebea18..68cefb2 100644
> --- a/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> +++ b/fs/overlayfs/copy_up.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,13 @@ retry:
> goto retry;
> }
>
> + error = security_inode_copy_up_xattr(name);
> + if (error < 0 && error != -EOPNOTSUPP)
> + break;
> + if (error == 1) {
> + error = 0;
> + continue; /* Discard */
> + }
> error = vfs_setxattr(new, name, value, size, 0);
> if (error)
> break;
> diff --git a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> index c1f95be..84caead 100644
> --- a/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> +++ b/include/linux/lsm_hooks.h
> @@ -410,6 +410,14 @@
> * @src indicates the union dentry of file that is being copied up.
> * @new pointer to pointer to return newly allocated creds.
> * Returns 0 on success or a negative error code on error.
> + * @inode_copy_up_xattr:
> + * Filter the xattrs being copied up when a unioned file is copied
> + * up from a lower layer to the union/overlay layer.
> + * @name indicates the name of the xattr.
> + * Returns 0 to accept the xattr, 1 to discard the xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP if
> + * security module does not know about attribute or a negative error code
> + * to abort the copy up. Note that the caller is responsible for reading
> + * and writing the xattrs as this hook is merely a filter.
> *
> * Security hooks for file operations
> *
> @@ -1435,6 +1443,7 @@ union security_list_options {
> size_t buffer_size);
> void (*inode_getsecid)(struct inode *inode, u32 *secid);
> int (*inode_copy_up) (struct dentry *src, struct cred **new);
> + int (*inode_copy_up_xattr) (const char *name);
>
> int (*file_permission)(struct file *file, int mask);
> int (*file_alloc_security)(struct file *file);
> @@ -1707,6 +1716,7 @@ struct security_hook_heads {
> struct list_head inode_listsecurity;
> struct list_head inode_getsecid;
> struct list_head inode_copy_up;
> + struct list_head inode_copy_up_xattr;
> struct list_head file_permission;
> struct list_head file_alloc_security;
> struct list_head file_free_security;
> diff --git a/include/linux/security.h b/include/linux/security.h
> index c976d79..08d3191 100644
> --- a/include/linux/security.h
> +++ b/include/linux/security.h
> @@ -283,6 +283,7 @@ int security_inode_setsecurity(struct inode *inode, const char *name, const void
> int security_inode_listsecurity(struct inode *inode, char *buffer, size_t buffer_size);
> void security_inode_getsecid(struct inode *inode, u32 *secid);
> int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new);
> +int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name);
> int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask);
> int security_file_alloc(struct file *file);
> void security_file_free(struct file *file);
> @@ -764,6 +765,11 @@ static inline int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
> +{
> + -EOPNOTSUPP;
return?
> +}
> +
> static inline int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask)
> {
> return 0;
> diff --git a/security/security.c b/security/security.c
> index 3d142aa..3321e31 100644
> --- a/security/security.c
> +++ b/security/security.c
> @@ -733,6 +733,12 @@ int security_inode_copy_up(struct dentry *src, struct cred **new)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_copy_up);
>
> +int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
> +{
> + return call_int_hook(inode_copy_up_xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP, name);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(security_inode_copy_up_xattr);
> +
> int security_file_permission(struct file *file, int mask)
> {
> int ret;
> @@ -1671,6 +1677,8 @@ struct security_hook_heads security_hook_heads = {
> LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.inode_getsecid),
> .inode_copy_up =
> LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.inode_copy_up),
> + .inode_copy_up_xattr =
> + LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.inode_copy_up_xattr),
> .file_permission =
> LIST_HEAD_INIT(security_hook_heads.file_permission),
> .file_alloc_security =
>
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-11 19:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/7] security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file |
| Message-ID | <rTMIO-1g9-23@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1440718 |
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:31:47AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote: > On 07/08/2016 12:19 PM, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > Provide a security hook which is called when xattrs of a file are being > > copied up. This hook is called once for each xattr and LSM can return 0 > > to access the xattr, 1 to reject xattr, -EOPNOTSUPP if none of the lsms > > claim to know xattr and a negative error code if something went terribly > > wrong. > > 0 if the security module wants the xattr to be copied up, 1 if the > security module wants the xattr to be discarded on the copy, -EOPNOTSUPP > if the security module does not handle/manage the xattr, or a -errno > upon an error. Ok, will change the description. > > > > > If 0 or -EOPNOTSUPP is returned, xattr will be copied up, if 1 is returned, > > xattr will not be copied up and if negative error code is returned, copy up > > will be aborted. > > Not sure I understand the benefit of the 0 vs -EOPNOTSUPP distinction. I am not sure either. Casey wanted to have four states so I introduced it. Thanks Vivek
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-11 19:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/7] security,overlayfs: Provide security hook for copy up of xattrs for overlay file |
| Message-ID | <rTMSt-1yI-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1440718 |
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 11:31:47AM -0400, Stephen Smalley wrote:
[..]
> > +static inline int security_inode_copy_up_xattr(const char *name)
> > +{
> > + -EOPNOTSUPP;
>
> return?
Yes, this one I fixed it in my patches now. kbuild also flagged this.
Vivek
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web