Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1439378 > unrolled thread

[PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: zero MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL on reset

Started byPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
First post2016-07-08 14:10 +0200
Last post2016-07-08 15:00 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: zero MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL on reset Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com> - 2016-07-08 14:10 +0200
    Re: [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: zero MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL on reset Haozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@intel.com> - 2016-07-08 15:00 +0200

#1439378 — [PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: zero MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL on reset

FromPaolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Date2016-07-08 14:10 +0200
Subject[PATCH 2/2] KVM: x86: zero MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL on reset
Message-ID<rSCLx-4Br-91@gated-at.bofh.it>
Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 388d9ffd7551..c01b0b3a06aa 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -7494,6 +7494,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
 	if (!init_event) {
 		kvm_pmu_reset(vcpu);
 		vcpu->arch.smbase = 0x30000;
+		vcpu->arch.msr_ia32_feature_control = 0;
 	}
 
 	memset(vcpu->arch.regs, 0, sizeof(vcpu->arch.regs));
-- 
1.8.3.1

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1439432

FromHaozhong Zhang <haozhong.zhang@intel.com>
Date2016-07-08 15:00 +0200
Message-ID<rSDxU-4TG-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1439378
On 07/08/16 14:01, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Reported-by: Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> index 388d9ffd7551..c01b0b3a06aa 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
> @@ -7494,6 +7494,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event)
>  	if (!init_event) {
>  		kvm_pmu_reset(vcpu);
>  		vcpu->arch.smbase = 0x30000;
> +		vcpu->arch.msr_ia32_feature_control = 0;
>  	}
>  
>  	memset(vcpu->arch.regs, 0, sizeof(vcpu->arch.regs));
> -- 
> 1.8.3.1
> 

Actually I'm not sure whether zeroing MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL on
reset is the accurate behavior.

I know as Laszlo reported that Intel SDM says

  VMXON is also controlled by the IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR (MSR
  address 3AH). This MSR is *cleared to zero* when a logical processor
  is reset

However, when the later section "ARCHITECTURAL MSRS" in Chapter
"MODEL-SPECIFIC REGISTERS (MSRS)" explains the Lock bit of
MSR_IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL in Table "IA-32 Architectural MSRs", it says

  ... once the Lock bit is set, the entire IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL
  contents are *preserved* across RESET when PWRGOOD is not
  deasserted.

This looks like a conflict. I'm asking my Intel colleagues for the
accurate behavior.

Thanks,
Haozhong

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web