Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1437014 > unrolled thread
| Started by | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-07-05 15:30 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-05 15:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH net-next 13/24] rxrpc: Access socket accept queue under right lock David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-07-05 15:30 +0200
| From | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-05 15:30 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH net-next 13/24] rxrpc: Access socket accept queue under right lock |
| Message-ID | <rRyAi-3kG-33@gated-at.bofh.it> |
The socket's accept queue (socket->acceptq) should be accessed under
socket->call_lock, not under the connection lock.
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
net/rxrpc/call_event.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/call_event.c b/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
index 638d66df284a..fc32aa5764a2 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/call_event.c
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ void rxrpc_process_call(struct work_struct *work)
if (call->state == RXRPC_CALL_SERVER_SECURING) {
_debug("securing");
- write_lock(&call->conn->lock);
+ write_lock(&call->socket->call_lock);
if (!test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_RELEASED, &call->flags) &&
!test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_EV_RELEASE, &call->events)) {
_debug("not released");
@@ -1097,7 +1097,7 @@ void rxrpc_process_call(struct work_struct *work)
list_move_tail(&call->accept_link,
&call->socket->acceptq);
}
- write_unlock(&call->conn->lock);
+ write_unlock(&call->socket->call_lock);
read_lock(&call->state_lock);
if (call->state < RXRPC_CALL_COMPLETE)
set_bit(RXRPC_CALL_EV_POST_ACCEPT, &call->events);
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web