Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1431596 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-27 00:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-07-04 20:50 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
[PATCH v4 11/29] x86/dumpstack: When OOPSing, rewind the stack before do_exit Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 11/29] x86/dumpstack: When OOPSing, rewind the stack before do_exit Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-07-04 20:50 +0200
| From | Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-27 00:00 +0200 |
| Subject | [PATCH v4 11/29] x86/dumpstack: When OOPSing, rewind the stack before do_exit |
| Message-ID | <rOqfT-8f8-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
If we call do_exit with a clean stack, we greatly reduce the risk of
recursive oopses due to stack overflow in do_exit, and we allow
do_exit to work even if we OOPS from an IST stack. The latter gives
us a much better chance of surviving long enough after we detect a
stack overflow to write out our logs.
I intentionally separated this from the preceding patch that
disables do_exit-on-OOPS on IST stacks. This way, if we need to
revert this patch, we still end up in an acceptable state wrt stack
overflow handling.
Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
---
arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S | 11 +++++++++++
arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S | 11 +++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c | 13 +++++++++----
3 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
index 983e5d3a0d27..0b56666e6039 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
@@ -1153,3 +1153,14 @@ ENTRY(async_page_fault)
jmp error_code
END(async_page_fault)
#endif
+
+ENTRY(rewind_stack_do_exit)
+ /* Prevent any naive code from trying to unwind to our caller. */
+ xorl %ebp, %ebp
+
+ movl PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_current_top_of_stack), %esi
+ leal -TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING-PTREGS_SIZE(%esi), %esp
+
+ call do_exit
+1: jmp 1b
+END(rewind_stack_do_exit)
diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
index 9ee0da1807ed..b846875aeea6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
+++ b/arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S
@@ -1423,3 +1423,14 @@ ENTRY(ignore_sysret)
mov $-ENOSYS, %eax
sysret
END(ignore_sysret)
+
+ENTRY(rewind_stack_do_exit)
+ /* Prevent any naive code from trying to unwind to our caller. */
+ xorl %ebp, %ebp
+
+ movq PER_CPU_VAR(cpu_current_top_of_stack), %rax
+ leaq -TOP_OF_KERNEL_STACK_PADDING-PTREGS_SIZE(%rax), %rsp
+
+ call do_exit
+1: jmp 1b
+END(rewind_stack_do_exit)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
index 352f022cfd5b..0d05f113805e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
@@ -226,6 +226,8 @@ unsigned long oops_begin(void)
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oops_begin);
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(oops_begin);
+extern void __noreturn rewind_stack_do_exit(int signr);
+
void oops_end(unsigned long flags, struct pt_regs *regs, int signr)
{
if (regs && kexec_should_crash(current))
@@ -245,12 +247,15 @@ void oops_end(unsigned long flags, struct pt_regs *regs, int signr)
return;
if (in_interrupt())
panic("Fatal exception in interrupt");
- if (((current_stack_pointer() ^ (current_top_of_stack() - 1))
- & ~(THREAD_SIZE - 1)) != 0)
- panic("Fatal exception on special stack");
if (panic_on_oops)
panic("Fatal exception");
- do_exit(signr);
+
+ /*
+ * We're not going to return, but we might be on an IST stack or
+ * have very little stack space left. Rewind the stack and kill
+ * the task.
+ */
+ rewind_stack_do_exit(signr);
}
NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(oops_end);
--
2.7.4
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-07-04 20:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 11/29] x86/dumpstack: When OOPSing, rewind the stack before do_exit |
| Message-ID | <rRh6q-Fs-9@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1431596 |
On Sun, Jun 26, 2016 at 02:55:33PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> If we call do_exit with a clean stack, we greatly reduce the risk of
Nits: do_exit()
> recursive oopses due to stack overflow in do_exit, and we allow
s/ in do_exit//
> do_exit to work even if we OOPS from an IST stack. The latter gives
Append "()" to the function names.
> us a much better chance of surviving long enough after we detect a
> stack overflow to write out our logs.
>
> I intentionally separated this from the preceding patch that
> disables do_exit-on-OOPS on IST stacks. This way, if we need to
> revert this patch, we still end up in an acceptable state wrt stack
> overflow handling.
>
> Reviewed-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
> ---
...
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> index 352f022cfd5b..0d05f113805e 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/dumpstack.c
> @@ -226,6 +226,8 @@ unsigned long oops_begin(void)
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(oops_begin);
> NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(oops_begin);
>
> +extern void __noreturn rewind_stack_do_exit(int signr);
You don't need the "extern" here.
> +
> void oops_end(unsigned long flags, struct pt_regs *regs, int signr)
> {
> if (regs && kexec_should_crash(current))
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web