Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1436168 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/2] pxa_camera transition to v4l2 standalone device

Started byHans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
First post2016-07-04 11:50 +0200
Last post2016-07-04 11:50 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/2] pxa_camera transition to v4l2 standalone  device Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl> - 2016-07-04 11:50 +0200

#1436168 — Re: [PATCH RFC v2 0/2] pxa_camera transition to v4l2 standalone device

FromHans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>
Date2016-07-04 11:50 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC v2 0/2] pxa_camera transition to v4l2 standalone device
Message-ID<rR8FQ-3Xv-27@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 04/02/2016 04:26 PM, Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> Hi Hans and Guennadi,
> 
> This is the second opus of this RFC. The goal is still to see how close our
> ports are to see if there are things we could either reuse of change.
> 
> From RFCv1, the main change is cleaning up in function names and functions
> grouping, and fixes to make v4l2-compliance happy while live tests still show no
> regression.
> 
> For the next steps, I'll have to :
>  - split the second patch, which will be a headache task, into :
>    - first functions grouping and renaming
>      => this to ensure the "internal functions" are almost untouched

It helps to review, but don't spend too much time on this either. By and large
it didn't look too bad when I reviewed the code.

Regards,

	Hans

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web