Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1431668 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-27 03:50 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-27 07:00 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> - 2016-06-27 03:50 +0200
Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 07:00 +0200
| From | Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-27 03:50 +0200 |
| Subject | linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree |
| Message-ID | <rOtQt-257-5@gated-at.bofh.it> |
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
net/sched/sch_netem.c
between commit:
21de12ee5568 ("netem: fix a use after free")
from the net tree and commit:
520ac30f4551 ("net_sched: drop packets after root qdisc lock is released")
from the net-next tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc net/sched/sch_netem.c
index 178f1630a036,ccca8ca4c722..000000000000
--- a/net/sched/sch_netem.c
+++ b/net/sched/sch_netem.c
@@@ -650,14 -617,17 +617,17 @@@ deliver
#endif
if (q->qdisc) {
+ unsigned int pkt_len = qdisc_pkt_len(skb);
- int err = qdisc_enqueue(skb, q->qdisc);
+ struct sk_buff *to_free = NULL;
+ int err;
+ err = qdisc_enqueue(skb, q->qdisc, &to_free);
+ kfree_skb_list(to_free);
- if (unlikely(err != NET_XMIT_SUCCESS)) {
- if (net_xmit_drop_count(err)) {
- qdisc_qstats_drop(sch);
- qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog(sch, 1,
- qdisc_pkt_len(skb));
- }
+ if (err != NET_XMIT_SUCCESS &&
+ net_xmit_drop_count(err)) {
+ qdisc_qstats_drop(sch);
+ qdisc_tree_reduce_backlog(sch, 1,
+ pkt_len);
}
goto tfifo_dequeue;
}
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-27 07:00 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rOwOm-3YT-21@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1431668 |
On Mon, 2016-06-27 at 11:46 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> net/sched/sch_netem.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 21de12ee5568 ("netem: fix a use after free")
>
> from the net tree and commit:
>
> 520ac30f4551 ("net_sched: drop packets after root qdisc lock is released")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
Looks good, although the 'use after free' does not happen anymore on
net-next since we defer skb freeing.
I spotted the bug in stable tree when cooking the net-next patch
actually ;)
Thanks.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web