Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1431600 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-27 00:00 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-28 15:30 +0200 |
| Articles | 5 on this page of 65 — 10 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
[PATCH v4 00/29] virtually mapped stacks and thread_info cleanup Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 07/29] mm: Fix memcg stack accounting for sub-page stacks Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 24/29] x86/entry: Get rid of pt_regs_to_thread_info() Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 10/29] x86/die: Don't try to recover from an OOPS on a non-default stack Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 10/29] x86/die: Don't try to recover from an OOPS on a non-default stack Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-07-02 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 10/29] x86/die: Don't try to recover from an OOPS on a non-default stack Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> - 2016-07-02 20:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 10/29] x86/die: Don't try to recover from an OOPS on a non-default stack Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-07-03 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 10/29] x86/die: Don't try to recover from an OOPS on a non-default stack Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-03 16:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 10/29] x86/die: Don't try to recover from an OOPS on a non-default stack Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-07-03 20:50 +0200
[PATCH v4 12/29] x86/dumpstack: When dumping stack bytes due to OOPS, start with regs->sp Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 06/29] mm: Track NR_KERNEL_STACK in KiB instead of number of stacks Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 14/29] x86/dumpstack/64: Handle faults when printing the "Stack:" part of an OOPS Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 26/29] sched: Allow putting thread_info into task_struct Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 08/29] dma-api: Teach the "DMA-from-stack" check about vmapped stacks Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 08/29] dma-api: Teach the "DMA-from-stack" check about vmapped stacks Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-06-30 21:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 08/29] dma-api: Teach the "DMA-from-stack" check about vmapped stacks Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-06 15:30 +0200
[PATCH v4 25/29] um: Stop conflating task_struct::stack with thread_info Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 25/29] um: Stop conflating task_struct::stack with thread_info Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-06-27 01:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 25/29] um: Stop conflating task_struct::stack with thread_info Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 01:50 +0200
[PATCH v4 22/29] x86/asm: Move 'status' from struct thread_info to struct thread_struct Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 22/29] x86/asm: Move 'status' from struct thread_info to struct thread_struct Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 02:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 22/29] x86/asm: Move 'status' from struct thread_info to struct thread_struct Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-06-27 02:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 22/29] x86/asm: Move 'status' from struct thread_info to struct thread_struct Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 02:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 22/29] x86/asm: Move 'status' from struct thread_info to struct thread_struct Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-06-27 02:50 +0200
[PATCH v4 19/29] signal: Consolidate {TS,TLF}_RESTORE_SIGMASK code Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:10 +0200
[PATCH v4 15/29] x86/mm/64: Enable vmapped stacks Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 15/29] x86/mm/64: Enable vmapped stacks Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 17:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 15/29] x86/mm/64: Enable vmapped stacks Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 15/29] x86/mm/64: Enable vmapped stacks Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-06-27 17:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 15/29] x86/mm/64: Enable vmapped stacks Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-06-27 18:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 15/29] x86/mm/64: Enable vmapped stacks Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 18:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 15/29] x86/mm/64: Enable vmapped stacks Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-06-27 18:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 15/29] x86/mm/64: Enable vmapped stacks Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 19:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 15/29] x86/mm/64: Enable vmapped stacks Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 15/29] x86/mm/64: Enable vmapped stacks Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> - 2016-06-27 19:30 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 15/29] x86/mm/64: Enable vmapped stacks Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-06-27 19:40 +0200
[PATCH v4 18/29] x86: Move addr_limit to thread_struct Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:10 +0200
[PATCH v4 17/29] x86: Move uaccess_err and sig_on_uaccess_err to thread_struct Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:10 +0200
[PATCH v4 03/29] x86/mm/hotplug: Don't remove PGD entries in remove_pagetable() Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:10 +0200
[PATCH v4 23/29] kdb: Use task_cpu() instead of task_thread_info()->cpu Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:10 +0200
[PATCH v4 16/29] x86/mm: Improve stack-overflow #PF handling Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:10 +0200
[PATCH v4 20/29] x86/smp: Remove stack_smp_processor_id() Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:10 +0200
[PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-06-28 09:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2016-06-28 09:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-06-28 11:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2016-06-28 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-06-28 09:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-06-28 10:00 +0200
[PATCH v4 04/29] x86/cpa: In populate_pgd, don't set the pgd entry until it's populated Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 04/29] x86/cpa: In populate_pgd, don't set the pgd entry until it's populated Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de> - 2016-06-28 21:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 04/29] x86/cpa: In populate_pgd, don't set the pgd entry until it's populated Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-06-28 21:10 +0200
[PATCH v4 01/29] bluetooth: Switch SMP to crypto_cipher_encrypt_one() Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 01/29] bluetooth: Switch SMP to crypto_cipher_encrypt_one() Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> - 2016-06-27 08:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 01/29] bluetooth: Switch SMP to crypto_cipher_encrypt_one() Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 01/29] bluetooth: Switch SMP to crypto_cipher_encrypt_one() Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> - 2016-06-28 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 01/29] bluetooth: Switch SMP to crypto_cipher_encrypt_one() Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-06-28 00:40 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 01/29] bluetooth: Switch SMP to crypto_cipher_encrypt_one() Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org> - 2016-07-04 20:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 01/29] bluetooth: Switch SMP to crypto_cipher_encrypt_one() Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> - 2016-07-06 15:20 +0200
[PATCH v4 21/29] x86/smp: Remove unnecessary initialization of thread_info::cpu Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> - 2016-06-27 00:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2016-06-28 10:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-06-28 11:00 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> - 2016-06-28 11:50 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-06-28 12:10 +0200
Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> - 2016-06-28 15:30 +0200
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
| From | Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-28 10:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad |
| Message-ID | <rOW66-3XK-13@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1431600 |
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 08:52:20AM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote: > > > - skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &sg[1], &sg[0], sizeof(tmpbuf), iv.x); > > + skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &sg, &sg, sizeof(tmpbuf), iv.x); > > Don't the sg's have to be different? Aren't they both altered by the process > of reading/writing from them? No they don't have to be different. > > struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp; > > ... > > + swap(tmpbuf.xl, *(__be64 *)sp); > > + > > + sg_init_one(&sg, sp, sizeof(tmpbuf)); > > ???? I assume you're assuming that the rxrpc_skb_priv struct contents can > arbitrarily replaced temporarily... Of course you can, it's per-skb state. > And using an XCHG-equivalent instruction? This won't work on a 32-bit arch > (apart from one that sports CMPXCHG8 or similar). No this is not using an atomic xchg, whatever gave you that idea? -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-28 11:00 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad |
| Message-ID | <rOX2a-4Ab-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1432593 |
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote: > > ???? I assume you're assuming that the rxrpc_skb_priv struct contents can > > arbitrarily replaced temporarily... > > Of course you can, it's per-skb state. I'm using the per-skb state for my own purposes and might be looking at it elsewhere at the same time. David
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-28 11:50 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad |
| Message-ID | <rOXOy-593-25@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1432659 |
On Tue, Jun 28, 2016 at 09:54:23AM +0100, David Howells wrote: > > I'm using the per-skb state for my own purposes and might be looking at it > elsewhere at the same time. AFAICS this cannot happen for secure_packet/verify_packet. In both cases we have exclusive ownership of the skb. But it's your code so feel free to send your own patch. Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-28 12:10 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad |
| Message-ID | <rOY7U-5vX-29@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1432698 |
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au> wrote: > > I'm using the per-skb state for my own purposes and might be looking at it > > elsewhere at the same time. > > AFAICS this cannot happen for secure_packet/verify_packet. In both > cases we have exclusive ownership of the skb. In code I'm busy working on the patch I'm decrypting may be on the receive queue several times. rxrpc has a jumbo packet concept whereby a packet may be constructed in such a way that it's actually several packets stitched together - the idea being that a router can split it up (not that any actually do that I know of) - but each segment of the jumbo packet may be enqueued as a separate entity. > But it's your code so feel free to send your own patch. I will apply something very similar to my tree. Andy's patch does not apply as-is due to conflicts. David
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-28 15:30 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH v4 02/29] rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad |
| Message-ID | <rP1fr-7Cg-1@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1432708 |
I'm going to commit this patch to my tree. Hopefully, this should appear in
net-next shortly.
David
---
commit 4da137ed8a467d01f87ac84ceb2a7af8719e0136
Author: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Date: Sun Jun 26 14:55:24 2016 -0700
rxrpc: Avoid using stack memory in SG lists in rxkad
rxkad uses stack memory in SG lists which would not work if stacks were
allocated from vmalloc memory. In fact, in most cases this isn't even
necessary as the stack memory ends up getting copied over to kmalloc
memory.
This patch eliminates all the unnecessary stack memory uses by supplying
the final destination directly to the crypto API. In two instances where a
temporary buffer is actually needed we also switch use a scratch area in
the rxrpc_call struct (only one DATA packet will be being secured or
verified at a time).
Finally there is no need to split a split-page buffer into two SG entries
so code dealing with that has been removed.
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
index 702db72196fb..796368d1fb25 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
+++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-internal.h
@@ -141,17 +141,16 @@ struct rxrpc_security {
int (*init_connection_security)(struct rxrpc_connection *);
/* prime a connection's packet security */
- void (*prime_packet_security)(struct rxrpc_connection *);
+ int (*prime_packet_security)(struct rxrpc_connection *);
/* impose security on a packet */
- int (*secure_packet)(const struct rxrpc_call *,
+ int (*secure_packet)(struct rxrpc_call *,
struct sk_buff *,
size_t,
void *);
/* verify the security on a received packet */
- int (*verify_packet)(const struct rxrpc_call *, struct sk_buff *,
- u32 *);
+ int (*verify_packet)(struct rxrpc_call *, struct sk_buff *, u32 *);
/* issue a challenge */
int (*issue_challenge)(struct rxrpc_connection *);
@@ -399,6 +398,7 @@ struct rxrpc_call {
struct sk_buff_head rx_oos_queue; /* packets received out of sequence */
struct sk_buff *tx_pending; /* Tx socket buffer being filled */
wait_queue_head_t tx_waitq; /* wait for Tx window space to become available */
+ __be32 crypto_buf[2]; /* Temporary packet crypto buffer */
unsigned long user_call_ID; /* user-defined call ID */
unsigned long creation_jif; /* time of call creation */
unsigned long flags;
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
index bf6971555eac..6a3c96707831 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_event.c
@@ -188,7 +188,10 @@ static int rxrpc_process_event(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
if (ret < 0)
return ret;
- conn->security->prime_packet_security(conn);
+ ret = conn->security->prime_packet_security(conn);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ret;
+
read_lock_bh(&conn->lock);
spin_lock(&conn->state_lock);
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c b/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c
index 4bfad7cf96cb..35b36beb4684 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/conn_object.c
@@ -138,7 +138,9 @@ rxrpc_alloc_client_connection(struct rxrpc_conn_parameters *cp, gfp_t gfp)
if (ret < 0)
goto error_1;
- conn->security->prime_packet_security(conn);
+ ret = conn->security->prime_packet_security(conn);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto error_2;
write_lock(&rxrpc_connection_lock);
list_add_tail(&conn->link, &rxrpc_connections);
@@ -152,6 +154,8 @@ rxrpc_alloc_client_connection(struct rxrpc_conn_parameters *cp, gfp_t gfp)
_leave(" = %p", conn);
return conn;
+error_2:
+ conn->security->clear(conn);
error_1:
rxrpc_put_client_connection_id(conn);
error_0:
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/insecure.c b/net/rxrpc/insecure.c
index e571403613c1..c21ad213b337 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/insecure.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/insecure.c
@@ -17,11 +17,12 @@ static int none_init_connection_security(struct rxrpc_connection *conn)
return 0;
}
-static void none_prime_packet_security(struct rxrpc_connection *conn)
+static int none_prime_packet_security(struct rxrpc_connection *conn)
{
+ return 0;
}
-static int none_secure_packet(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
+static int none_secure_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call,
struct sk_buff *skb,
size_t data_size,
void *sechdr)
@@ -29,7 +30,7 @@ static int none_secure_packet(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
return 0;
}
-static int none_verify_packet(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
+static int none_verify_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call,
struct sk_buff *skb,
u32 *_abort_code)
{
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c b/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c
index 23c05ec6fa28..3acc7c1241d4 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/rxkad.c
@@ -103,43 +103,43 @@ error:
* prime the encryption state with the invariant parts of a connection's
* description
*/
-static void rxkad_prime_packet_security(struct rxrpc_connection *conn)
+static int rxkad_prime_packet_security(struct rxrpc_connection *conn)
{
struct rxrpc_key_token *token;
SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK(req, conn->cipher);
- struct scatterlist sg[2];
+ struct scatterlist sg;
struct rxrpc_crypt iv;
- struct {
- __be32 x[4];
- } tmpbuf __attribute__((aligned(16))); /* must all be in same page */
+ __be32 *tmpbuf;
+ size_t tmpsize = 4 * sizeof(__be32);
_enter("");
if (!conn->params.key)
- return;
+ return 0;
+
+ tmpbuf = kmalloc(tmpsize, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!tmpbuf)
+ return -ENOMEM;
token = conn->params.key->payload.data[0];
memcpy(&iv, token->kad->session_key, sizeof(iv));
- tmpbuf.x[0] = htonl(conn->proto.epoch);
- tmpbuf.x[1] = htonl(conn->proto.cid);
- tmpbuf.x[2] = 0;
- tmpbuf.x[3] = htonl(conn->security_ix);
-
- sg_init_one(&sg[0], &tmpbuf, sizeof(tmpbuf));
- sg_init_one(&sg[1], &tmpbuf, sizeof(tmpbuf));
+ tmpbuf[0] = htonl(conn->proto.epoch);
+ tmpbuf[1] = htonl(conn->proto.cid);
+ tmpbuf[2] = 0;
+ tmpbuf[3] = htonl(conn->security_ix);
+ sg_init_one(&sg, tmpbuf, tmpsize);
skcipher_request_set_tfm(req, conn->cipher);
skcipher_request_set_callback(req, 0, NULL, NULL);
- skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &sg[1], &sg[0], sizeof(tmpbuf), iv.x);
-
+ skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &sg, &sg, tmpsize, iv.x);
crypto_skcipher_encrypt(req);
skcipher_request_zero(req);
- memcpy(&conn->csum_iv, &tmpbuf.x[2], sizeof(conn->csum_iv));
- ASSERTCMP((u32 __force)conn->csum_iv.n[0], ==, (u32 __force)tmpbuf.x[2]);
-
- _leave("");
+ memcpy(&conn->csum_iv, tmpbuf + 2, sizeof(conn->csum_iv));
+ kfree(tmpbuf);
+ _leave(" = 0");
+ return 0;
}
/*
@@ -152,12 +152,9 @@ static int rxkad_secure_packet_auth(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
{
struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp;
SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK(req, call->conn->cipher);
+ struct rxkad_level1_hdr hdr;
struct rxrpc_crypt iv;
- struct scatterlist sg[2];
- struct {
- struct rxkad_level1_hdr hdr;
- __be32 first; /* first four bytes of data and padding */
- } tmpbuf __attribute__((aligned(8))); /* must all be in same page */
+ struct scatterlist sg;
u16 check;
sp = rxrpc_skb(skb);
@@ -167,24 +164,19 @@ static int rxkad_secure_packet_auth(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
check = sp->hdr.seq ^ sp->hdr.callNumber;
data_size |= (u32)check << 16;
- tmpbuf.hdr.data_size = htonl(data_size);
- memcpy(&tmpbuf.first, sechdr + 4, sizeof(tmpbuf.first));
+ hdr.data_size = htonl(data_size);
+ memcpy(sechdr, &hdr, sizeof(hdr));
/* start the encryption afresh */
memset(&iv, 0, sizeof(iv));
- sg_init_one(&sg[0], &tmpbuf, sizeof(tmpbuf));
- sg_init_one(&sg[1], &tmpbuf, sizeof(tmpbuf));
-
+ sg_init_one(&sg, sechdr, 8);
skcipher_request_set_tfm(req, call->conn->cipher);
skcipher_request_set_callback(req, 0, NULL, NULL);
- skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &sg[1], &sg[0], sizeof(tmpbuf), iv.x);
-
+ skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &sg, &sg, 8, iv.x);
crypto_skcipher_encrypt(req);
skcipher_request_zero(req);
- memcpy(sechdr, &tmpbuf, sizeof(tmpbuf));
-
_leave(" = 0");
return 0;
}
@@ -198,8 +190,7 @@ static int rxkad_secure_packet_encrypt(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
void *sechdr)
{
const struct rxrpc_key_token *token;
- struct rxkad_level2_hdr rxkhdr
- __attribute__((aligned(8))); /* must be all on one page */
+ struct rxkad_level2_hdr rxkhdr;
struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp;
SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK(req, call->conn->cipher);
struct rxrpc_crypt iv;
@@ -218,18 +209,16 @@ static int rxkad_secure_packet_encrypt(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
rxkhdr.data_size = htonl(data_size | (u32)check << 16);
rxkhdr.checksum = 0;
+ memcpy(sechdr, &rxkhdr, sizeof(rxkhdr));
/* encrypt from the session key */
token = call->conn->params.key->payload.data[0];
memcpy(&iv, token->kad->session_key, sizeof(iv));
sg_init_one(&sg[0], sechdr, sizeof(rxkhdr));
- sg_init_one(&sg[1], &rxkhdr, sizeof(rxkhdr));
-
skcipher_request_set_tfm(req, call->conn->cipher);
skcipher_request_set_callback(req, 0, NULL, NULL);
- skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &sg[1], &sg[0], sizeof(rxkhdr), iv.x);
-
+ skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &sg[0], &sg[0], sizeof(rxkhdr), iv.x);
crypto_skcipher_encrypt(req);
/* we want to encrypt the skbuff in-place */
@@ -243,9 +232,7 @@ static int rxkad_secure_packet_encrypt(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
sg_init_table(sg, nsg);
skb_to_sgvec(skb, sg, 0, len);
-
skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, sg, sg, len, iv.x);
-
crypto_skcipher_encrypt(req);
_leave(" = 0");
@@ -259,7 +246,7 @@ out:
/*
* checksum an RxRPC packet header
*/
-static int rxkad_secure_packet(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
+static int rxkad_secure_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call,
struct sk_buff *skb,
size_t data_size,
void *sechdr)
@@ -267,10 +254,7 @@ static int rxkad_secure_packet(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp;
SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK(req, call->conn->cipher);
struct rxrpc_crypt iv;
- struct scatterlist sg[2];
- struct {
- __be32 x[2];
- } tmpbuf __attribute__((aligned(8))); /* must all be in same page */
+ struct scatterlist sg;
u32 x, y;
int ret;
@@ -293,20 +277,17 @@ static int rxkad_secure_packet(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
/* calculate the security checksum */
x = call->channel << (32 - RXRPC_CIDSHIFT);
x |= sp->hdr.seq & 0x3fffffff;
- tmpbuf.x[0] = htonl(sp->hdr.callNumber);
- tmpbuf.x[1] = htonl(x);
-
- sg_init_one(&sg[0], &tmpbuf, sizeof(tmpbuf));
- sg_init_one(&sg[1], &tmpbuf, sizeof(tmpbuf));
+ call->crypto_buf[0] = htonl(sp->hdr.callNumber);
+ call->crypto_buf[1] = htonl(x);
+ sg_init_one(&sg, call->crypto_buf, 8);
skcipher_request_set_tfm(req, call->conn->cipher);
skcipher_request_set_callback(req, 0, NULL, NULL);
- skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &sg[1], &sg[0], sizeof(tmpbuf), iv.x);
-
+ skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &sg, &sg, 8, iv.x);
crypto_skcipher_encrypt(req);
skcipher_request_zero(req);
- y = ntohl(tmpbuf.x[1]);
+ y = ntohl(call->crypto_buf[1]);
y = (y >> 16) & 0xffff;
if (y == 0)
y = 1; /* zero checksums are not permitted */
@@ -367,7 +348,6 @@ static int rxkad_verify_packet_auth(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
skcipher_request_set_tfm(req, call->conn->cipher);
skcipher_request_set_callback(req, 0, NULL, NULL);
skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, sg, sg, 8, iv.x);
-
crypto_skcipher_decrypt(req);
skcipher_request_zero(req);
@@ -452,7 +432,6 @@ static int rxkad_verify_packet_encrypt(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
skcipher_request_set_tfm(req, call->conn->cipher);
skcipher_request_set_callback(req, 0, NULL, NULL);
skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, sg, sg, skb->len, iv.x);
-
crypto_skcipher_decrypt(req);
skcipher_request_zero(req);
if (sg != _sg)
@@ -498,17 +477,14 @@ nomem:
/*
* verify the security on a received packet
*/
-static int rxkad_verify_packet(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
+static int rxkad_verify_packet(struct rxrpc_call *call,
struct sk_buff *skb,
u32 *_abort_code)
{
SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK(req, call->conn->cipher);
struct rxrpc_skb_priv *sp;
struct rxrpc_crypt iv;
- struct scatterlist sg[2];
- struct {
- __be32 x[2];
- } tmpbuf __attribute__((aligned(8))); /* must all be in same page */
+ struct scatterlist sg;
u16 cksum;
u32 x, y;
int ret;
@@ -533,20 +509,17 @@ static int rxkad_verify_packet(const struct rxrpc_call *call,
/* validate the security checksum */
x = call->channel << (32 - RXRPC_CIDSHIFT);
x |= sp->hdr.seq & 0x3fffffff;
- tmpbuf.x[0] = htonl(call->call_id);
- tmpbuf.x[1] = htonl(x);
-
- sg_init_one(&sg[0], &tmpbuf, sizeof(tmpbuf));
- sg_init_one(&sg[1], &tmpbuf, sizeof(tmpbuf));
+ call->crypto_buf[0] = htonl(call->call_id);
+ call->crypto_buf[1] = htonl(x);
+ sg_init_one(&sg, call->crypto_buf, 8);
skcipher_request_set_tfm(req, call->conn->cipher);
skcipher_request_set_callback(req, 0, NULL, NULL);
- skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &sg[1], &sg[0], sizeof(tmpbuf), iv.x);
-
+ skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, &sg, &sg, 8, iv.x);
crypto_skcipher_encrypt(req);
skcipher_request_zero(req);
- y = ntohl(tmpbuf.x[1]);
+ y = ntohl(call->crypto_buf[1]);
cksum = (y >> 16) & 0xffff;
if (cksum == 0)
cksum = 1; /* zero checksums are not permitted */
@@ -710,29 +683,6 @@ static void rxkad_calc_response_checksum(struct rxkad_response *response)
}
/*
- * load a scatterlist with a potentially split-page buffer
- */
-static void rxkad_sg_set_buf2(struct scatterlist sg[2],
- void *buf, size_t buflen)
-{
- int nsg = 1;
-
- sg_init_table(sg, 2);
-
- sg_set_buf(&sg[0], buf, buflen);
- if (sg[0].offset + buflen > PAGE_SIZE) {
- /* the buffer was split over two pages */
- sg[0].length = PAGE_SIZE - sg[0].offset;
- sg_set_buf(&sg[1], buf + sg[0].length, buflen - sg[0].length);
- nsg++;
- }
-
- sg_mark_end(&sg[nsg - 1]);
-
- ASSERTCMP(sg[0].length + sg[1].length, ==, buflen);
-}
-
-/*
* encrypt the response packet
*/
static void rxkad_encrypt_response(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
@@ -741,17 +691,16 @@ static void rxkad_encrypt_response(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
{
SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK(req, conn->cipher);
struct rxrpc_crypt iv;
- struct scatterlist sg[2];
+ struct scatterlist sg[1];
/* continue encrypting from where we left off */
memcpy(&iv, s2->session_key, sizeof(iv));
- rxkad_sg_set_buf2(sg, &resp->encrypted, sizeof(resp->encrypted));
-
+ sg_init_table(sg, 1);
+ sg_set_buf(sg, &resp->encrypted, sizeof(resp->encrypted));
skcipher_request_set_tfm(req, conn->cipher);
skcipher_request_set_callback(req, 0, NULL, NULL);
skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, sg, sg, sizeof(resp->encrypted), iv.x);
-
crypto_skcipher_encrypt(req);
skcipher_request_zero(req);
}
@@ -887,10 +836,8 @@ static int rxkad_decrypt_ticket(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
}
sg_init_one(&sg[0], ticket, ticket_len);
-
skcipher_request_set_callback(req, 0, NULL, NULL);
skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, sg, sg, ticket_len, iv.x);
-
crypto_skcipher_decrypt(req);
skcipher_request_free(req);
@@ -1001,7 +948,7 @@ static void rxkad_decrypt_response(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
const struct rxrpc_crypt *session_key)
{
SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK(req, rxkad_ci);
- struct scatterlist sg[2];
+ struct scatterlist sg[1];
struct rxrpc_crypt iv;
_enter(",,%08x%08x",
@@ -1016,12 +963,11 @@ static void rxkad_decrypt_response(struct rxrpc_connection *conn,
memcpy(&iv, session_key, sizeof(iv));
- rxkad_sg_set_buf2(sg, &resp->encrypted, sizeof(resp->encrypted));
-
+ sg_init_table(sg, 1);
+ sg_set_buf(sg, &resp->encrypted, sizeof(resp->encrypted));
skcipher_request_set_tfm(req, rxkad_ci);
skcipher_request_set_callback(req, 0, NULL, NULL);
skcipher_request_set_crypt(req, sg, sg, sizeof(resp->encrypted), iv.x);
-
crypto_skcipher_decrypt(req);
skcipher_request_zero(req);
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Page 4 of 4 — ← Prev page 1 2 3 [4]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web