Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > linux.kernel > #1432123 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-06-27 17:20 +0200 |
| Last post | 2016-06-27 19:20 +0200 |
| Articles | 2 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: [PATCH RESEND] trace: function graph: Fix filters for function_graph threshold Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-06-27 17:20 +0200
Re: [PATCH RESEND] trace: function graph: Fix filters for function_graph threshold Joel Fernandes <agnel.joel@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 19:20 +0200
| From | Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-27 17:20 +0200 |
| Subject | Re: [PATCH RESEND] trace: function graph: Fix filters for function_graph threshold |
| Message-ID | <rOGum-20Y-31@gated-at.bofh.it> |
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 01:25:16 -0700 Joel Fernandes <agnel.joel@gmail.com> wrote: > Gentle ping. Could you anyone pick up this patch? > > Thanks for the reminder. As this isn't a regression (it never worked ;-) do you think this should go to the stable releases, and/or even the current release. Or are you fine with this just going in the next merge window? -- Steve
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Joel Fernandes <agnel.joel@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-06-27 19:20 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <rOImt-3d4-7@gated-at.bofh.it> |
| In reply to | #1432123 |
Hi Steve, On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 01:25:16 -0700 > Joel Fernandes <agnel.joel@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Gentle ping. Could you anyone pick up this patch? >> >> > > Thanks for the reminder. As this isn't a regression (it never > worked ;-) do you think this should go to the stable releases, and/or > even the current release. Or are you fine with this just going in the > next merge window? Queuing for the next merge window is fine with me. Thanks for picking it up. Regards, Joel
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel
csiph-web