Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1432123 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH RESEND] trace: function graph: Fix filters for function_graph threshold

Started bySteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
First post2016-06-27 17:20 +0200
Last post2016-06-27 19:20 +0200
Articles 2 — 2 participants

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH RESEND] trace: function graph: Fix filters for  function_graph threshold Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> - 2016-06-27 17:20 +0200
    Re: [PATCH RESEND] trace: function graph: Fix filters for  function_graph threshold Joel Fernandes <agnel.joel@gmail.com> - 2016-06-27 19:20 +0200

#1432123 — Re: [PATCH RESEND] trace: function graph: Fix filters for function_graph threshold

FromSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date2016-06-27 17:20 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH RESEND] trace: function graph: Fix filters for function_graph threshold
Message-ID<rOGum-20Y-31@gated-at.bofh.it>
On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 01:25:16 -0700
Joel Fernandes <agnel.joel@gmail.com> wrote:

> Gentle ping. Could you anyone pick up this patch?
> 
>

Thanks for the reminder. As this isn't a regression (it never
worked ;-) do you think this should go to the stable releases, and/or
even the current release. Or are you fine with this just going in the
next merge window?

-- Steve

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#1432169

FromJoel Fernandes <agnel.joel@gmail.com>
Date2016-06-27 19:20 +0200
Message-ID<rOImt-3d4-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
In reply to#1432123
Hi Steve,

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 8:17 AM, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 01:25:16 -0700
> Joel Fernandes <agnel.joel@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Gentle ping. Could you anyone pick up this patch?
>>
>>
>
> Thanks for the reminder. As this isn't a regression (it never
> worked ;-) do you think this should go to the stable releases, and/or
> even the current release. Or are you fine with this just going in the
> next merge window?

Queuing for the next merge window is fine with me. Thanks for picking it up.

Regards,
Joel

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web