Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > linux.kernel > #1431268 > unrolled thread

Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] rtc: ac100: Add RTC driver for X-Powers AC100

Started byAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
First post2016-06-26 03:10 +0200
Last post2016-06-26 03:10 +0200
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to linux.kernel

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] rtc: ac100: Add RTC driver for X-Powers AC100 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> - 2016-06-26 03:10 +0200

#1431268 — Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] rtc: ac100: Add RTC driver for X-Powers AC100

FromAlexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
Date2016-06-26 03:10 +0200
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 4/8] rtc: ac100: Add RTC driver for X-Powers AC100
Message-ID<rO6Kd-4xS-1@gated-at.bofh.it>
On 20/06/2016 at 10:52:14 +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote :
> +static int ac100_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> +	struct ac100_dev *ac100 = dev_get_drvdata(pdev->dev.parent);
> +	struct ac100_rtc_dev *chip;
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	chip = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*chip), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, chip);
> +	chip->dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	chip->regmap = ac100->regmap;
> +	mutex_init(&chip->mutex);
> +
> +	chip->irq = of_irq_get(pdev->dev.of_node, 0);

Forgot that one, platform_get_irq() is probably more common but I don't
care that much. I think you can then avoid including of.h and of_irq.h.

> +	if (chip->irq < 0) {
> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "No IRQ resource\n");
> +		return chip->irq;
> +	}
> +

-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | linux.kernel


csiph-web